Most Americans disapprove of President Trump's sweeping tariff policies, with recent polls showing 52% opposing the measures while only 36% express support, as concerns mount that the tariffs could cost the average U.S. household between $1,900 and $7,600 annually through higher prices on imported goods ranging from groceries and clothing to electronics and building materials.
The financial impact of Trump's tariffs on American households varies significantly across different analyses, with estimates ranging from $830 to $4,600 annually. According to the Tax Foundation, Trump's proposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, along with 10% tariffs on China, would effectively tax the average U.S. household an extra $830 this year and increase taxes by $1.2 trillion between 2025 and 2034.1 More comprehensive analyses from Yale's Budget Lab suggest a much higher burden of $3,800 per household annually when all tariffs are considered.23 The Center for American Progress places the figure even higher at $4,600 per year for a typical American family.4
Lower-income households will bear a disproportionate burden from these tariff policies. The Budget Lab estimates that households at the bottom of the income distribution will face annual losses of $980 from the April 2nd policy alone.56 This inequity stems from the fact that lower-income families spend a larger percentage of their earnings on necessities like food, energy, and clothing—items directly affected by tariffs—while wealthier households allocate more spending to services not subject to these import taxes.7 The impact represents what economists describe as a 2.3% effective "pay cut" in disposable income for American households.3
Apparel prices have experienced dramatic increases, with online clothing prices rising 17.3% year-over-year in November 2021, marking the highest inflation rate since Adobe began tracking digital economy data in 201412. This surge represents a significant departure from historical trends, as clothing prices had remained remarkably stable for decades—the Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that apparel prices in 2024 were essentially the same as they were in 19943.
The impact of Trump's new tariffs on clothing is expected to be particularly severe, with Yale research indicating apparel prices could rise 8% from the April 2nd tariff action alone and 17% from all U.S. tariffs implemented in 202545. With approximately 97% of clothes and shoes purchased in the U.S. being imported (predominantly from Asia), American families face potentially steep price increases67. The Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America estimates that athletic shoes made in Vietnam could jump from $150 to $220 if the tariffs take effect as planned6, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income consumers who already spend an average of $2,041 annually on apparel and services8.
Low-income Americans face the most severe consequences from Trump's tariffs, with households in the lowest income brackets potentially experiencing a 4-5.5% reduction in their disposable income—nearly three times the impact on wealthier households12. This disproportionate burden stems from fundamental spending patterns: lower-income families spend approximately 30% of their income on food compared to just 10% for higher-income households3, and they allocate larger portions of their budgets to necessities like clothing and personal care products4.
The regressive nature of tariffs is particularly evident in consumer goods pricing. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that Trump's tariffs will slash disposable income in the poorest households by at least $1,700 annually3, with fresh produce prices projected to rise by 4% and clothing costs increasing by 17%3. Low-income consumers face a uniquely difficult situation as they have fewer options to "trade down" to cheaper alternatives when prices rise3. For a household in the second-lowest income decile, the April tariff policy alone creates an average annual consumer loss of $980 per household5, forcing difficult choices between essential needs and potentially worsening food insecurity across the country6.