Astronics Corporation Price & Performance (ATRO)

You can find these documents on our website or at sec.gov. During today's call, we'll also discuss some non GAAP measures. We believe will be useful in evaluating our performance. You should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliations of non GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today's release. So with that, let me turn it over to Pete to begin. Pete? Thank you, Craig, and good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the call.

We feel our fourth quarter was a very strong close to 2024, which was a year of significant progress for the company. I'll talk first about the quarter, then about the year, Nancy will go through some specifics of the financials and then we'll turn our attention to a preview of 2025. Operationally, the fourth quarter was a very good quarter for Astronics Astronics. Sales came in at $2.00 $8,500,000 the high end of our forecasted range once again.

It was just short of our all time high, which was way back in the third quarter of twenty eighteen eighteen and we achieved this in spite of the Boeing strike, which essentially shut down our biggest program at our biggest The volume was made possible by the continued improvement in our supply chain and operating efficiencies in our operations. Higher volume had a very positive impact on our margins So progress was masked by some unusual factors or adjustments I'll come back to them in a minute. Until then, I will speak to adjusted numbers as to [indiscernible] of 11.4% for the quarter, up from 5.9% adjusted net income was 8.1%, up from 3.3% last year. Adjusted EBITDA was 31,500,000.0 or 15.1% of sales. The positive margins led to positive cash from operations of $26,400,000 in the quarter. Was our first seriously positive cash quarter since before the pandemic. Our Aerospace segment was the driver of the results Sales of $188,500,000 was an all time high up 11.7% for the quarter. Commercial, aero and military aircraft continued to drive the results. Adjusted operating margin for our Aerospace segment was 616% for the quarter, up from 10.2% last year. Obviously, there were some significant adjustments in the quarter.

A couple of them were true ups situations that were initially covered in our third quarter release Colonial bankruptcy true up of $1,000,000 another $1,700,000 So $2,700,000 total for those two. We had another restructuring charge in our test business of 1,400,000.0 But the big adjustments had to do with a important step forward in our patent infringement dispute in The UK We had legal expenses of $6,100,000 in the quarter, largely for a damages trial that took place in October We had refinance expenses of $3,200,000 for some steps that we took to protect against the potential of a negative ruling in that damages And then we increased our legal settlement reserve by $4,800,000 which sounds like a loss, but was actually a significant victory for us. Those who have been following us closely know that there was a range of possible The actual outcome was very much in favor of our position compared to what it possibly could have been if it had gone the other way. But still the award was $4,800,000 higher than our accruals going into the hearing. So that shows up on our income statement in the fourth quarter. The quarter provided a strong close to the year which as I said was a year of significant recovery for the company.

Sales grew to $795,000,000 dollars up 15.4% over 2023 We've averaged over 20% growth over the last three year period Adjusted operating income was 7.7%, up from 2.1% in 2023 and adjusted EBITDA was 12.1% for the year, up from 8.1% in 2023. Finally, demand continues to be strong. Q4 bookings were $196,000,000 a book to bill of 0.94 We figure the Boeing strike hurt our bookings by about $10,000,000 in each of the third quarter and the fourth quarter. Still, we ended the year with a backlog of $599,000,000 dollars I'm not going to spend a whole lot of time talking on the issues that are driving our results, tailwinds you might refer to them as, but it's worth mentioning our supply chain continues to improve improve and perform better and better. Our workforce is getting more efficient and more accustomed to their responsibilities. We talked a while ago about how a significant portion of our work force has been with us for less than three years, like 45%. Input cost pressures continue to subside, pricing adjustments are taking hold and demand continues to be strong. All in all, a lot of tailwinds as we exit 2024 and go into 2025.

Now I'll turn it over to Nancy.

Thanks, Steve. I'll now touch on some of the drivers behind our operational and financial results on a consolidated basis followed by some segment level highlights. We had a very solid quarter of continued growth in the fourth quarter of 'twenty four, as Pete mentioned, Aerospace hit a new record in revenue The strength of the underlying business and our ability to expand our margins were masked by a few atypical charges we had in the quarter, some of which Pete talked about, allow me to walk you through those in a little bit more detail.

Profitability continues to strengthen with growth profit up $10,000,000 or 25% and gross margin expanded 3.5 points to 24% over the prior year quarter demonstrating three consecutive quarters of margin expansion. Offsetting the benefits of higher volume and improved operational efficiency was an additional $1,700,000 warranty reserve related to a product that requires a field modification, which we talked about last quarter. This was related to a custom electrical power system designed specifically for a business jet aircraft introduced in 2018 that was experiencing less than optimal reliability over time. We have been working closely with our customer on this issue and are implementing a fix that both our customer and our team believe will fully address the issue. In addition, we had a $800,000 inventory charge related to the Lilium bankruptcy. There had been a glimmer of hope as they appeared to have found new financing back in December. But that didn't come through, so they're in bankruptcy again. Adjusting for both, non GAAP gross margin expanded four seventy basis points to 25.2%. Operating income increased $1,100,000 despite including the additional expense to true up our reserves for The U. K. Damages award that Pete mentioned. Elevated legal expenses and some restructuring charges in our Test segment.

These included the $4,800,000 incremental reserve for payment of damages for The UK IP litigation award We also had $6,000,000 in litigation related legal expenses and $1,400,000 in costs for the further restructuring of our Test Systems segment. Adjusting for all the atypical items, non GAAP adjusted operating margin for the fourth quarter was 11.4%, a significant improvement over the prior year and the trailing third quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.1%. Below the operating line was $3,000,000 in cost related to the extinguishment of our previous term loan that was fully paid down in the fourth quarter. The interest savings resulting from the restructuring of that previous term loan and our ABL debt which were at a blended rate of roughly 9%, to the convertible debt that's at a rate of 5.5% results in a $5,600,000 annual reduction in interest expense. Net loss for the quarter was $0.08 per diluted share, Non GAAP adjusted earnings per share was $0.48 compared with non GAAP adjusted earnings per share in last year's quarter of $0.19 and a non GAAP earnings per share in the trailing third quarter of $0.35 per share. We generated $26,400,000 in cash from operations for the quarter.

Which as Pete mentioned is our largest cash generating quarter since the third quarter of The improved cash flow was driven by improved conversion of profits after non cash adjustments and lower working capital requirements. Net debt at the end of the quarter was about $157,000,000 down $18,000,000 from the prior quarter.

We ended the quarter with $18,400,000 in cash and roughly $188,000,000 available to draw at our recently amended revolving credit facility. As you know, we issued $165,000,000 of 5.5% convertible senior notes on December three of last year.

The conversion price is $22.89 per share representing a 30% premium over the closing stock price on 11/25/2024. The notice mature on 03/15/2030 but are callable and redeemable by us on or after 03/28/2028.

Redemptions require the stock price to be 130% of the conversion price for 20 of the thirty trading days preceding any quarter end, or trading at approximately $30 per share.

The notes are classified as a long term liability on our balance sheet at the end of the year. The near term potential dilution impact on EPS is about 7,200,000.0 shares, However, it's important to note that once callable or if redeemed, we do have the flexibility to settle the notes in cash as well as stock and our intention is to minimize dilution by at a minimum affecting a net share settlement with $165,000,000 principal paid in cash measurably reducing the dilution effect. In fact, given our outlook on improving profitability and the very favorable ruling in The UK, we feel we'll be in a strong position to cover the notes with cash. We also plan to use some of our available liquidity to reinvest in the business to be in a position to be able to meet our growth plans. Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $35,000,000 to $40,000,000 in 2025 which is a higher level than our last few years while we were managing our liquidity through the pandemic. In addition to catching up on deferred spending, we are also planning a facility consolidation and additional capacity to allow for future growth. We currently have about $216,000,000 in available liquidity and have nothing currently outstanding on our revolver.

We expect that given our expectations of improving profitability, that we will be in a position to convert our asset based revolver to a cash based that will provide greater financial flexibility at some point in the not so distant future. We could use that excess liquidity in other efforts, including acquisitions or to buy back shares, which we believe are trading at a discount. Or as I noted previously to settle some or all of the convertible bonds and cash. Moving on to our segment level results.

Let me cover some key factors driving profitability within our Aerospace segment. Our Aerospace segment is roughly 90% of our business. The segment had record sales in the quarter of $188,500,000 which is an 11.7% increase over the fourth quarter in 2023 and six percent up over the trailing quarter.

Growth was driven largely by a $16,700,000 increase in commercial trans primarily related to increased demand by the airlines, for cabin power and in flight entertainment and connectivity products. This was somewhat offset by lower sales of commercial lighting in safety products resulting from the Boeing strike.

Operating profit for Aerospace improved $2,500,000 year over year and was also up $2,500,000 or 18% over the trailing quarter.

Adjusted operating profit was $30,200,000 in the quarter compared with $17,200,000 in the prior year period. And $25,300,000 in the third quarter. On an adjusted basis, aerospace demonstrated 45% operating leverage on the higher volume from the third fourth quarter Adjusted operating margin improved 5.8 points year over year to six and improved 180 basis points sequentially. Turning to the Test segment. The Test business operating profit was roughly breakeven at but modest The twenty twenty four fourth quarter had $1,400,000 in restructuring although litigation expenses were down about $700,000 We expect to begin realizing approximately $4,000,000 to $5,000,000 in annual We expect to begin realizing approximately $4,000,000 to $5,000,000 in annual cost savings beginning in the first quarter of twenty twenty five resulting from the restructuring. However, we are also anticipating a weak first half for this business. Timing on the 40 five-forty nine T Army radio test program will define the profitability profile for the test business this year. Obviously, the sooner production kicks in, the better. Tests adjusted operating margin was 7.3%, an improvement over the 2.5% of the comparative quarter, demonstrating the benefit from the restructuring initiatives implemented during 2024. And with that, let me turn it back to Pete.

Pete?

Most of you are aware that we have been involved in a lengthy patent infringement suit brought by European plaintiffs relevant to our NCE Power product line for many years since way back in 2010 This situation has gotten more than a little attention over the last few months. So I thought I'd provide a little update as to where we stand Legal proceedings over the years have been held or are being held in The U. S. France, Germany and The UK. In The USA and France, the patent was found to be invalid So the French decision is being appealed there in the coming months. Germany dismissed some of claims of the patent, but upheld others and found that Astronics been infringing The company paid $3,500,000 in penalties and interest in 2020 and has taken a reserve of $17,300,000 to cover remaining estimated damages and associated interest. We expect but don't know that proceedings there may commence in 2026. [indiscernible] found the entire patent to be valid and found Astronics to be infringing. The damages hearing was held in October we had reserved $7,400,000 to cover anticipated damages but the point of claimed damages of up to dollars in that hearing.

That's a big difference. The decision came down on February 21 requiring Astronics to pay damages of [indiscernible] consider this a very favorable ruling compared to the range of possible outcomes.

The company expects the damages due to be paid in the first half of twenty twenty five.

There will be a couple of follow on hearings in coming months to decide certain other issues peripheral to the ruling. Such as the award of possible interest charges and assignment of legal fees. We do not have a basis to estimate what these may be at this time there's a line of logic that says they could be zero or they could be somewhat substantial, but we do not expect them in any event to be any more than the damages award. An appeal to a higher court is possible in the matter brought by one or both of the parties such an appeal would likely be heard in the first half of twenty twenty six. It's important to understand that all of the subject patents expired years ago and do not restrict the business of our company today in any way whatsoever. So with that being said, as we look at 2025, we're feeling really good about our position here early in the year. Our balance sheet and liquidity position is the strongest it has been in five years. Our backlog is at a record high for the beginning of any new year. Our supply chain and employee base is increasingly effective productive and efficient.

Our volume has been ramping and our margin profile has been improving along with it. We are maintaining our initial 2025 sales guide at this point of $820,000,000 to $860,000,000 We are expecting first quarter sales to be in the range of $190,000,000 to $25,000,000 so a little bit lighter than the quarter we just experienced. We are expecting sales to ramp as the year progressed especially in the second half. [indiscernible] concludes our prepared remarks for the call. We can open up the line now for questions.

And our first question comes from the line of John Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Hey, good afternoon, guys. Thank you for taking my questions and congrats on the UK case coming out a lot less than the upper end there. I guess my first question if you could, could you talk about the potential, I guess, for the other open ended cases out there to have damages claimed in or around that neighborhood or to that scale? Is that possible? At this point? Or do you think you have a good handle on what's going to just be?

It's It's a bit of an open question, John. In France, mean, it could be zero. If the appeal court maintains the dismissal of the mean, this decision comes down that way, then we're done in France. Just like we're done in The U. S. If it comes back that they want some further investigation by a lower court to discuss the validity of the patent that will kick us back into some kind of litigation cycle that could go on for some time. Where we have to decide or the court will have to redecide if the patent is valid and if it's valid, if we're infringing and if we're infringing what the damages could be, it and it's just it's hard to predict how that could end up or how long it could take. I mean, the way things have going, it realistically could be another couple of years. And Germany is relatively advanced. The There they found there's no question about patent validity. There is a question about damages And we had been thinking that both of those will wait until The U. K. Issue is resolved. This U. K. Issue obviously went in our favor, in a very big way.

So we don't know what the other side is going to do. We expect to figure that out over the next few months. Our guess is that if there's an appeal, that the other two will slow roll while that appeal takes shape. But I think if you step back and you look at it, we were concerned on the heels of our October hearing that we might face a big loss [indiscernible] In retrospect, it's a pretty big win.

And It's possible that we will have strong wins in The U. S. And France and The U. K. Here going forward and then the question becomes Germany But the other side has been pretty aggressive throughout this ordeal and has been making pretty big claims of the legal system So far, we're pretty happy with how it's worked out hoping for more of the same Okay. Great. Could you talk a little bit more about the increased CapEx this year, what you're planning the fund and maybe the cadence of cash flow? Nancy, if you could touch on that?

Want to talk, Nancy?

Yes. So the CapEx will I think will be fairly level loaded throughout the year. We have some facility consolidation that we're we're planning to do here, which is going to be the primary driver for the increased level of CapEx that you're seeing compared to what our kind of our normal range is. Our normal range tends to be in the $12,000,000 to $20,000,000 a year pre pandemic, depending on what we had going on. So that uplift that you're seeing is a combination of the deferred normal deferred maintenance that from the last several years that we're catching up on. And then another $15,000,000 to $18,000,000 net of some tenant improvement allowances to build out a facility to allow for expansion as we grow the business.

I would just add that we've really had the company on a starvation diet for the last four years as our liquidity situation was really tight. And Nancy said our normal cap rate capital expenditures were kind of $10,000,000 to $20,000,000 We've been living in the $3,000,000 $5,000,000 $7,000,000 range, which is which is not sustainable long term. We feel like we've made it through and we feel like we're going to be cash positive And I think the fourth quarter was a really good demonstration of that. So it's time to kind of turn the corner a little bit and make investments where our investments need to happen to execute on the opportunities that are ahead of us in the business.

Great. Thank you. Last one if I could sneak it in, just any thoughts on on the various military programs that you have out there I guess the topic du jour with potential defense budget reallocations or changes if you think any of those programs might be followed Not that we're aware of. I would just I would categorize [indiscernible] into three major buckets on the aerospace side in particular. We do a lot of spare parts for aircraft that are flying and have been built over the last twenty, thirty years and those aircraft are critical They fly every day. So those spare parts sales are going to continue as best we can tell. And then we do more and more work on small drone like aircraft, which are increasingly in favor. So we would think that that scenario that might get more funding not less The big program though that has everybody attention is the flare up program, the B-two 80 and And that's a big targeted investment for the U. S. Army. It's their biggest aviation program going. And it's important to us And we think it's got pretty broad support across the Army and across the government.

But we'll have to wait and see how that shapes out. Certainly, the actions of the government have been a little unpredictable so far, but we think that program has pretty strong support Great. Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Michael Ciarmoli with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Hey, evening guys. Nice results. Thanks for taking the questions. Pete, just on the $25,000,000 outlook, any color you can give us on kind of the ARO test lid? I know you said Test is going to be weaker in the first half and probably more dependent the ramp of the Army radio program there and then I mean, the margin I guess even on the guidance to the margins in ARO really strong, I think maybe one of the best you guys had on record. Any color on kind of adjusted margins into 2025?

Well, we we've been playing a long game here, maybe longer than we expected. Thinking that the business was coming back and being a little bit wishing it was coming back faster, but it came back pretty steadily and strongly over the last eight ten quarters really. And we see that kind of continued split. So kind of ninetyten is probably a reasonable assumption going forward. We expect ARO to continue to have pretty strong margins and pretty strong results in that I guess our feeling is that there's some upside potential to that forecast largely in the area of commercial transport production rates at Boeing. We built our current forecast on the assumption of 25 737s a month for the first eight months and 30 for the last four, And at this point, the indications are that Boeing is going to exceed that. Obviously, we're not limiting we're not going to limit Boeing to those numbers. Want to order more, we'll build more, but you got to put something into a forecast. And that's the assumption that we use. So I think there's upside potential to that part of our business. And on the test side, the real issue is this 45, 49 T radio test program that Nancy was talking about.

Which we're hoping gets into production in the fourth quarter. That's going to be a significant contributor You might call it a game changer for our test business. It will be very obvious in 2025 The question is when it's going to get going or excuse me, 2026. The question is when it's going to get going in the end of twenty twenty five. We're hoping for a full quarter.

Of contribution in that business.

Okay. Okay.

And then what what should we expect with I know it's a very fluid environment, but tariffs, I think you kind of back in the I think it was 2019 period or so, you kind of called out a $10,000,000 impact. Any thoughts around tariffs and how you might kind of respond to that?

Well, it's a changing picture as you know. So it's a little premature to say for sure. We feel that our supply chain over the years has kind of fixed itself and minimized its impact or its dependence on China. I mean, we use a lot of electronic components. So ultimately, China is the source of a lot of things that we do, but more and more of the value add has been moved out of China into other countries over the years. Mexico isn't much of a big deal to us from a supply chain. We do have an operating company in Canada, which will to a large extent, shift to The U. S. So that will be a topic for discussion, but most of the contracts, we would think would obligate the buyer or the importer to actually pay those tariffs. So we don't think that's a big deal. But then again, there could be We do a lot of sales to Europe. We do a lot of sales to Asia and other parts of the world. So depending on how out of control this whole situation gets, it could get a it could be quite fluid as you said.

Got it.

And last one for me, just on the retrofit side of the market, Pete, what do you guys see in there? You're kind of reading and hearing that there's some of the challenges with business class fees and just a lot of the capacity being used up to support some of the older planes flying is creating some challenges on the retrofit market. Anything you're seeing in terms of supply chains or bottleneck issues there? Or are you kind of seeing good demand [indiscernible] if there's any color on growth in that portion of the business in 2025?

It's been strong in part due to the aircraft production problems, both at Boeing and Air Bud, So airplanes have been pulled out of the desert and modernized a pretty strong clip. One of the nice things about our business, as you know, Michael, is the eternal quest for updated consumer electronics basically and and the things that people want to do in airplanes. So as those new seats get developed, there's a continual push for new updated technologies and we benefit from that. It's a kind of a unique business where we replace a lot of our product not necessarily because it doesn't work, or needs to be fixed, but because the technology changes. So It's a nice place to be. And as those new seats are developed, they go into both new airplanes and into old airplanes that are being retrofitted And we [indiscernible] opportunities along with the seat manufacturers at the benefit for the benefit of the airlines. Got it. Got it. All right. Perfect. Thanks guys. I'll jump back in the queue.

Question will come again from the line of John Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Hi, thanks for the follow-up.

I was just wondering if you're you saw the order rates from Boeing rebound has it gotten back into production or are they still burning off some inventory there? And kind of how you see that order run rate Yes. The order is actually haven't We haven't got a whole lot of new orders. What we do have is rescheduled old orders. So bookings have been a little bit light in the third and fourth quarter. As I mentioned, if you look back at those results, they look like a drop off from the beginning of the year. I think a lot of that is Boeing anticipating a strike and rescheduling existing orders. But the cadence of deliveries that they're requesting is is pretty strong. I mean, it's in line with with what they're saying and they're moving towards that 25 or 30 ships a month from my perspective more quickly than we might have expected. So it's encouraging. I think they're they they've got some momentum and that's a good thing. Now the unknown there that we're going to have to balance out is inventory that's in the system we think they've got two or three months of inventory of most of our products for $7.37 in various places in Seattle.

So So we expect that our turn on rate will trail their production rate some extent. And that's why we're putting in our forecast 25 ships a month for most of 2025. But But in general, we're encouraged by the dialogue. We're encouraged by the discussion. We've had a lot of positive attention from Boeing in our facilities, make sure we're ready to go. And I think we're on a good track. It's potentially going to be a good story for 2025 unlike what it's been for the last couple of years.

Got it. Thanks. Could you give us an update on municipal transit markets and what you're seeing out there, especially as you're seeing a lot more of these back to work return office type programs. [indiscernible] We're hearing a lot of that. I'm looking for data. There is some data that that's beginning to return to office is picking up momentum in certain municipalities. But it hasn't materially changed the market at this point. As far as we can tell. I think programs in our transit test market are still alive, we think, but they regularly delayed to the right. So we're hopeful though. I think it does have some real momentum. It's in places that needs it, frankly. So We're hopeful.

It's a watch item. Got it. Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.