FS KKR Capital Corp. Price & Performance (FSK)

Please note that this call is the property of FSK. Any unauthorized rebroadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. Today's conference call includes forward looking statements and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could affect FSK or the economy generally. We ask that you refer to FSK's most recent filings with the SEC for important factors and risks that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from these statements. FSK does not undertake to update its forward looking statements unless required to do so by law. In addition, this call will include certain non GAAP financial measures. For such measures, reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in FSP's fourth earnings release that was filed with the SEC on February 26, 2025. Non GAAP information should be considered supplemental in nature and should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, these non GAAP financial measures may not be the same as similarly named measures reported by other companies. To obtain copies of the company's latest SEC filings, please visit FSK's website. Speaking on today's call will be Michael Forman, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

Dan Petersack, Chief Investment Officer and Co President and Stephen Lilly, Chief Financial Officer. Also joining us on the call today are our Co Chief Operating Officer, Drew O'Toole and Ryan Wilson. I'll now turn the call over to Michael.

Thank you, Anna, and good morning, everyone. Thank you all for joining us for FSK's fourth quarter and full year twenty twenty four earnings conference call. My opening comments this morning will cover two specific topics. Our accomplishments during 2024 and our goals for 2025. During 2024, we were highly focused on four specific objectives. First, our goal is to improve credit quality and overall portfolio stability. To that end, during the year, we reduced our non accrual investments by 58% to 3.7% on a cost basis and 2.2% on a fair value basis. Second, our goal is to remain extremely disciplined Even if that discipline During 2024, our investment team deployed $4,700,000,000 of capital into compelling new transactions. We're entering 2025 with significant available liquidity view this as a competitive strength as we expect M and A activity to increase perhaps materially during 2025 and beyond. Third, our goal is to provide shareholders with an annual distribution of $2.9 per share. We achieved this goal as our base and supplemental distributions totaled $2.8 per share and we paid $0.1 per share in special distributions during the first half of the year. Fourth, our goal is to maintain our strong balance sheet.

During the second quarter, we issued $600,000,000 of unsecured notes maturing in 2029 and during the fourth quarter we issued $700,000,000 of unsecured notes maturing in 02/1930. For 2025, our goals are as follows: first, we expect our investment team will continue to utilize its deep relationships to originate a portfolio. We recognize that we are starting from a position of strength given our relatively low leverage. As of year end. Second, based upon our current view of interest rates for the year, we expect to provide shareholders with $2.8 of total distributions. Through a combination of our quarterly based distribution of $0.64 per share and our quarterly supplemental distribution which is equated to $0.06 per share for the last several quarters. And while we recognize that the recent decline in interest rates will reduce our net investment income, We believe our healthy balance of spillover income will enable us to continue rewarding shareholders returning to them the additional earnings we generated, during the recent higher interest rate period. Third, we expect to continue proactively laddering the right side of our balance sheet to maintain and over time enhance our investment grade ratings. Turning to our fourth quarter results, FSK generated net investment income totaling $0.61 per share and adjusted net investment income $0.66 per share.

As compared to our public guidance of approximately $0.63 per share and $0.68 per share respectively. The difference in our reported financial results as compared to our guidance relates to a few new investment opportunities, which closed after year end. In keeping with my earlier comments, our Board has declared a first quarter distribution of $0.7 per share consisting of our base distribution of $0.64 per share and a supplemental distribution of $0.06 per share. With that, I'll turn the call over to Dan. Thanks, Michael. As Michael indicated, 2024 was a strong year of execution for our credit platform. And for FSK. I'm proud of the performance we delivered which is a testament to the hard work, dedication and strategic focus of our entire team. Since the establishment of the FSK Care Advisor almost seven years ago, we've originated over $27,000,000,000 of new investments, which have generated an unlevered IRR of 9.6% since inception. Additionally, our strong 2024 performance enabled us to deliver shareholders a 12.1% yield on our average net asset value and share shareholders were further rewarded with a total return of 23%. [indiscernible] Turning to the state of the economy and the lending environment, The current macroeconomic environment for many is a balancing act between a desire for growth lingering inflationary pressures and recent and expected interest rate adjustments.

The current administration's issuance of a significant number of executive orders and swift moves across multiple geopolitical and international economic fronts. Including the ongoing threats of significant tariffs with large trading partners. Have somewhat tempered enthusiasm for a quick start to the year from an M and A standpoint. Instead, companies are taking steps to quantify what effects these potential policies may have on their businesses.

As a result, while our expectations still call for a robust increase in M and A activity, over the next few years. We caution investors that a significant increase in M and A activity may take longer to materialize than certain industry observers are forecasting. That being said, I would note that our early stage pipeline has been building meaningfully, supporting our view of a continued increase in deal activity during 2025 and beyond. Against this backdrop, we continue to see strong tailwinds in the direct lending market. The current level of interest rates has created a very balanced scenario where interest burdens for portfolio companies have been reduced from the highs of 2023. While simultaneously, the current rate environment still producing attractive levels of income driven total return for investors. Credit defaults have remained largely contained across the industry. And borrowers continue to generate revenue and earnings growth. All of this points to direct lending market fundamentals remaining and we believe the scales will continue moving in the favor of private credit providers. Turning to our investment activity during the fourth quarter. We originated $891,000,000 of new investments. Compared to $1,460,000,000 of exits. There were no sales from FSK to our joint venture this quarter.

We continue to benefit from incumbency across our As the majority of our new investments were focused on add on financings, to existing portfolio companies and long term KKR relationships. New originations consisted of approximately 63% in first lien loans, 36% in asset based finance investments, and 1% in equity or other investments. Our new direct lending investments have a weighted average EBITDA of approximately $2.00 $6,000,000 5.4 turns of leverage through our security, and a weighted average coupon of approximately SOFR plus five sixteen basis points. We continue to focus on the was $239,000,000 as of 12/31/2024. And our portfolio companies reported a weighted average year over year EBITDA growth rate of approximately 16%. Across companies in which we have invested in since April of twenty eighteen. Interest coverage levels have rebounded to 1.7 times, compared to 1.6 times last quarter at 1.5 times during the fourth quarter of twenty twenty three. As of the end of the fourth quarter, non accruals represented 3.7% of our portfolio on a cost basis. And 2.2% of our portfolio on a fair value basis. This compares to 3.8% of our portfolio on a cost basis and 1.7% of our portfolio on a fair value basis as of 09/30/2024.

We also believe it's helpful to provide the market with information based on the FSK assets originated by KKR Credit. Non accruals relating to the 89% of our total portfolio, which has been originated by KKR Credit and the FS KKR Advisor, were 2% on a cost basis, and 80 basis points on a fair value basis as of the end of the fourth quarter. This compares to 2.2% on a cost basis and 50 basis points on a fair value basis as of the end of the third quarter. During the fourth quarter, two investments were added to non accrual status, and one investment was removed.

Our first lien senior secured position in Alacrity Solutions Group was added to non accrual. Contributing $22,000,000 of cost and $16,000,000 of fair value.

In addition, our preferred equity investment in Cubicorp was added to non accrual contributing $56,000,000 of cost and $42,000,000 of fair value. Also during the quarter, certain parts of our debt position in Miami Beach Medical Group were written off in conjunction with the company's Chapter 11 process. We expect to receive certain additional proceeds in relation to our remaining debt exposure as the investment is winding down In terms of other portfolio updates, worldwide, the Pet product provider, which we discussed on our last earnings call, was restructured during the fourth The sponsor contributed approximately $42,000,000 of additional capital into the business with $30,000,000 being used to repay the term loan of par. As a result of the restructuring, FSK $19,000,000 of first lien senior secured take back debt. Committed $1,700,000 to a new DDTL, and received equity in the business. Across FSK and other funds, KKR now has a 35% equity ownership and three FS seats. Lastly, we are pleased to note that Maverick Natural Resources a legacy position which has been in the portfolio since 2014, has announced a sale to Diversified Energy. As a result, FSK's $37,000,000 investment will be monetized. We expect the transaction will close in the coming quarters.

Subject to the customary closing conditions. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Steve. Thanks, Dan. As of 12/31/2024, our investment portfolio had a fair value of $13,500,000,000 consisting of two fourteen portfolio companies. At the end of the fourth represented approximately 21% of the fair value of our investment portfolio compared to 20% as of the end of the third quarter. We continue to focus on senior secured investments as our portfolio consisted of approximately fifty eight percent first lien loans and 64% senior secured debt as of December 31.

In addition, our joint venture represented approximately 10% of the fair value of our As a result, when investors consider our entire portfolio, looking through to the investments in our joint venture, in first lien loans total approximately 67% of our total and senior secured investments total approximately 73% of our portfolio as of December 31.

The weighted average yield on accruing debt investments was 11% as of 12/31/2024, a decrease of 50 basis points compared to 11.5% as of September 30, The decrease primarily is attributable to the decline in base rates and incremental spread compression. As a reminder, the calculation of weighted average yield is adjusted to exclude the accretion associated with the merger of FSKR. From an operational perspective, our total investment income decreased by $34,000,000 quarter over quarter to $4.00 $7,000,000 primarily due to the decline in base rates and the delayed closing of certain new investments until the first quarter of this year. The delay in investment closings resulted in lower fee income, quarter over quarter and also lower leverage as a quarter end. The primary components of our total investment income during the quarter were as follows: Total interest income was $324,000,000 a decrease of $32,000,000 quarter over quarter. Dividend and fee income totaled $83,000,000 a decrease of $2,000,000 quarter over quarter. Our total dividend and fee income during the quarter is summarized as follows: $53,000,000 of recurring dividend income from our joint venture other dividends from various portfolio companies totaling approximately $23,000,000 during the quarter and fee income totaling approximately $7,000,000 Our interest expense totaled $116,000,000 a decrease of $2,000,000 quarter over quarter.

And our weighted average cost of debt was 5.4% as of December 31. Management fees totaled $53,000,000 a decrease of $1,000,000 quarter over quarter and incentive fees totaled $35,000,000 a decrease of $9,000,000 quarter over quarter. Other expenses totaled $9,000,000 during the fourth quarter. A decrease of $1,000,000 The detailed bridge in our net asset value per share on a quarter over quarter basis [indiscernible] Our ending third quarter twenty twenty four net asset value per share of $23.82 was increased by GAAP net investment income of $0.61 per share and was decreased by $0.09 per share due to a decrease in the overall value of our investment portfolio. Our net asset value per share was reduced by our $0.7 per share total quarterly distribution paid during the quarter. The sum of these activities results in our 12/31/2024 net asset value per share of $23.06 $4 From a forward looking guidance perspective, we expect first quarter twenty twenty five GAAP net investment income to approximate $0.66 per share, and we expect our adjusted net investment income to approximate $0.64 per share.

Detailed first quarter guidance is as follows: Our recurring interest income on a GAAP basis is expected to approximate $310,000,000 We expect recurring dividend income associated with our joint venture to approximate $46,000,000 We expect other fee and dividend income to approximate $41,000,000 during the first quarter. From an expense standpoint, we expect our management fees to approximate $53,000,000 We expect incentive fees approximate $38,000,000 we expect our interest expense to approximate $112,000,000 and we expect other G and A expenses to approximate $9,000,000 And as Michael indicated during his remarks, we currently expect our distributions during the year will total at least $2.8 share comprised of $2.56 per share of base distributions and $0.24 per share of supplemental distributions. Turning to our capital structure. During the fourth quarter, we issued $700,000,000 of 6.125% unsecured notes, due 02/1930 which subsequently were swapped to floating rate interest rate swap agreements at an average of SOFR [indiscernible] 2.127%. Proceeds were used to repay outstanding debt on our revolver. We continue to proactively manage our liability structure upcoming maturities and we expect we will access the unsecured market on an opportunistic basis during 2025. Our gross and net debt to equity levels were 112104% respectively.

At December 31, 2024, compared to 121109% at 09/30/2024. At December 31, our available liquidity was $4,800,000,000 and approximately 75% of our drawn balance sheet and 47% of our committed balance sheet was comprised of unsecured debt. And with that, I'll turn the call back to Michael. For a few closing remarks. Before we open the call for questions. Thanks, Stephen. As we move into 2025, we remain highly focused on our strategy and the opportunities ahead of us. Our portfolio continues to demonstrate strong credit performance and our balance sheet provides us with ample liquidity to take advantage of quality transactions during 2025 and beyond. We thank you for your continued support and we look forward to updating you on our progress toward our goals during the year. With that operator, we'd like to open the line for questions.

Thank you.

At this time, we will conduct a question and answer session. Our first question comes from Ken Lee of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hey, thanks for taking my question and good morning.

Just one on the dividends outlook there. I guess, wonder if you could just further flesh out your confidence in terms of the dividend outlook. It sounds as if spillover income is a big factor there. Just wondering if you could just provide some color in terms of what it implies about adjusted debt investment income outlook as well? Thanks. Yes. Good morning, Ken. I'm happy to start and Stephen may want add to it. I think a couple of different points there. We had set up our dividend policy from the last couple of years now with this kind of idea of the base and the supplemental. The base being the 64%, the supplemental being the 6%. Dollars I would note that the $0.64 I think at current NAV is still roughly 11%, so still attractive We did have several quarters of over earning over the last handful of years considering the rate as well as the spread environment.

We think it was it's prudent to kind of reward the shareholders with that level of additional earnings. That's been the conversation with our Board as well. So I think we remain focused on that base and supplemental. So to components, but are providing the guidance of expecting $2.8 for the year.

Yes. And Ken, it's Steven. Just to add on to what Dan was saying, we were They've been I call it, successful in building the spillover balance that we've talked to the market about.

As we sit today, that's that represents two point seven quarters worth of total dividends. In terms of the strategy this year, we would reduce that to somewhere around two point three quarters worth of total dividends, which on a long term basis and you've certainly covered the stock for a long time, we said we'd like to be plus or minus two quarters. So it brings us back to that level, that sort of long term target level. In that range. It's nothing more than that and I think it's a good signal obviously for shareholders as well have some certainty of payments this year.

Got you.

Very helpful there. And just one follow-up, if I may. I think in the prepared remarks, you mentioned seeing a decline in base rates as well some spread compression in the quarter there. Wondering if I could just get your thoughts around how would you characterize the spread you're getting per unit of risk, like for example, leverage what kind of trends are you seeing there? Thanks.

Yes. I mean, I think Ken, we've seen almost across all credit markets a decent amount of spread compression.

I think in a lot of ways, at least for kind of the new deal flow, probably saw more of that spread compression in the first half of last year sort of going into the third quarter.

I think we've seen maybe some stability on the new deals, albeit maybe still test certain kind of new levels. I think you could argue the regular way direct lending deal these days is 4.75% or kind of 5% before fee income though. But you've seen the syndicated market tightened down pretty meaningfully as well.

I think we've also seen a certain amount of repricings in the book That said, I think the repricings are generally highly correlated to names that are performing well. And I think if we would also though on the other side of that use those repricing potentially exit certain positions if we didn't necessarily love the risk reward. But I think you can put in context that it's a bit of a a more borrower friendly market these days when it comes to spreads. I think on the other side of that, the total return of these deals that we're still seeing is roughly 10% considering I think the strength of the company, the size of the company. It's still Pretty attractive in our mind.

Got you. Very helpful there. Thanks again.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Casey Alexander of Compass Point Research and Trading. Your line is now open.

Thank you.

Since the deals have already closed and because it might help for modeling purposes, is there any way to give any granularity or quantify how much in terms of new origination got rolled over from Q4 to Q1? Good morning, Geshi. I think you try to think about the right to the number. We're talking a couple of handful of deals, kind of two, that probably would have 2 odd cents, 3 odd cents of sort of fee income Okay. Those deals deals closed, there's a timing difference.

Okay. And then you talked about [indiscernible] M and A may be delayed, but at the same time you said that you're your pipeline is filling. So what do you where are you getting the pipeline fill Are private equity sponsors starting to bring forward some of the back books that they need to get rid of? Or are these companies that are just completely insulated from the bulk of government policies? Where are you seeing that pipeline fill if M and A pickup is being delayed? Yes. No, it's a fair question. And maybe we should have been a little crisper in the prepared remarks. But I think we were I think we and probably the rest of the market has been kind of waiting for what I'll call that meaningful impact And M and A volume sort of across the market. I'm not sure it gets maybe all the way to 21 levels, but I'm not sure it's that far of that In many ways, everything was lining up for that, right? You've got private equity LPs wanting to get capital back. You've got a bunch of dry powder It's been a slow couple of years. I think the capital markets and others were probably further pulled up on that trend as it relates to the new administration sort of coming So I think in our mind with some of the points whether it's tariffs or sort of otherwise I think people are doing a little bit more maybe work at the portfolio company level It's slowing down in our mind that larger wave that we're expecting.

That said, and maybe in a simpler way, I think we're kind of busier now than we were in different points of 'twenty three and 'twenty four, but I think we're expecting Okay. Thank you for that. And one last one, on Maverick.

Would you characterize that that sale kind of at the mark above or below? Fair question. It would have I would characterize it as the mark. I mean, I think the mark that's in sort of Q3 is quite a fair mark. [indiscernible] The sale price was kind of above the mark. I think As we got to go through the closing conditions, as there's certain ways which we'll monetize that on a go forward basis, Again, in all of our valuations, we would incorporate certain kind of points in there to not just bring it to straight kind of market value sort of price side, but I think that's in line with how we would value something like that. But the sale was above the mark you would have seen. All right, great. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you. Our next question comes from Robert Dodd of Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Hi guys. On the kind of type of the M and A build, right, I mean a lot of the larger players in the market are just focused on sponsor finance, but you're not. So how would you characterize separately from the sponsor backed Outlook for 2025 and building pipeline. [indiscernible] a lot of market talk about that as kind of an express wave. But I mean, you've been in for a while. But what's your what's your outlook on that side of the book?

Yes. I mean, I think you're right, Robert. We've got a big business there. We've got roughly 50 people focused on that. We've got north of $65,000,000,000 of total AUM It's always been a a part of what we're doing here at FSK FS. We've been active there. I think that's had a fair amount had a certain amount of activity for kind of different reasons. Right? We've seen different things going on with banks. We've seen different asset portfolios come out of banks. We've seen a somatic, which I think is almost equity market driven. Where the equity market is rewarding companies for being balance sheet lights You think about our asset backed businesses or others, we're essentially in the asset asset storage business. So there's good partnerships that we can do with those corporates there. A bunch of those corporates are probably names that we wouldn't historically get to do business with. The size of that market is meaningful. I do think in a lot of ways that market at least on the institutional side, probably feels like the direct lending market did five or ten years ago in terms of people starting to get more interest. But it's a big market.

I think we've got a bunch of unique or proprietary exploit.

Got it. Thank you. And then just on your normal course are down. I mean, are you seeing areas of weakness? Obviously, not broadly, right? I mean, I think you said EBITDA growth across portfolio weighted average 16%. That's clearly not weak, right? But that's across the whole I mean, are there any areas of either portfolio of the market where concerns are ramping up.

It's It's the right question. I think the issues that we probably have seen either across the portfolio or maybe a couple of names that we would have mentioned here have probably been more idiosyncratic to those specific issuers. Whether it was customer loss or otherwise. I would say kind of more broadly, we've been in an environment where interest coverage ratios, even though there's sort of rebound have been Probably on the lower side for the last handful of years, think that does expose companies when there is a above in the road that it bubbles up or becomes an issue sort of faster. So there's probably a little bit more of that as kind of time goes on. But again, it's it's been probably more idiosyncratic I do think there are things out there that are top of mind these days. Right? We touched on FS, We touched on the Department of Government Efficiency.

There are different I think scenarios or concerns around either continued wage inflation or the ability to get the right amount of employees that's kind of top of mind So I think we're pretty constructive on the economy. We're pretty constructive on the big levers of The U. S. Economy. But I do think there's some either events or scenarios out there that have some downside to it and we're using our portfolio monitoring unit, we're using the whole team to be pretty focused on those.

Got it. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sinead Finian O'Shea of Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is now open.

Hey, everyone. Good morning. [indiscernible] Questions on the on the fees? Is the $41,000,000 I think you said for the non recurring that's an improvement Should we think of that as more of a one off strong quarter or the sort of rebound level And then similar question for the [indiscernible] dividend that's a That's a recurring one, but understanding and practice it moves around a little bit. So seeing what we should think of that the $46,000,000 there as well?

Thanks. Yes. Good morning, Fin. On the joint venture dividend maybe first, I think you're right. I mean, it will move a bit. Obviously, there could be different events repayments or kind of other fees earned within there. Obviously, we've got a a great joint venture partner there as we think about how we kind of manage distributions there. But I think with inside that range of what you would have seen in the last couple of quarters is probably fair. I would note, I think we got some room to grow the joint venture.

I think that's kind of top of mind for FS. It's almost in line with I like where we're at from a target leverage perspective, right? Where we're at from a leverage perspective right now, but obviously we're more on the lower side of our target. Think we'd be pretty comfortable at 115 versus kind of 104. But that's at least the way I think about the joint venture. I think you're kind of broader fee and dividend income, I think that will bounce around Right. The asset backed space Well, not all those deals are necessarily [indiscernible] in terms of when cash flow is released. I think we probably continue to see lower, what I'll call, regular way fee income just because originations have been probably a bit more muted.

And maybe even a little bit kind of May call or so the CallPro income [indiscernible] We were holding on to assets for a fairly less the amount of time and so that CallPro FS sort of rolling off. But I think that one will bounce around a bit, but I think the joint venture probably a little bit more consistent to your point. Okay. Thanks. So sort of tying into that and Question on the dividend discussion. You covered pretty well in the remarks in the Q and A here. What's the like ongoing level if any, of taxable income over NOI I imagine ABF might generate some non accruals, might generate some [indiscernible] that looking at it from that way, if there's a significant amount, like does this does this payout and say an assumed low to mid-60s NOI this year does that get you back down to the target two quarters or Is there a good chance that this sort of same policy extends into 2026 when we revisit a year from now.

Yes. Let me start and then Stephen FS going to take it.

Think it's probably difficult to forecast out or think about what happens in 2026, right? I think that will be very dependent upon deal activity, what we're seeing kind of markets, etcetera. But I think we wanted to make the statement and provide the clarity as it relates to '25.

But Stephen, add to the rest.

No, I think that's right. And then as you remember, when we entered and came into 2024, then our spillover on again a total quarter's worth of dividends basis was kind of 2.9 quarters close to three We paid the special last year in the first two quarters that helped us a little bit there. As mentioned earlier on one of the questions, we're 2.7 quarters now at the end of this year. All things being equal, we'd be down around 2.3 quarters worth of dividends, which is in our range kind of the closer to the top end of our range of plus or minus two quarters' worth of dividends. So Again, spillover will move a little bit too, it always does. Just because there's so many puts and takes there. On a year over year basis. But we think it's again a very good strategy returning some of this capital to shareholders this year. And then as Dan says, we'll sort of pop Periscope next year and see where things are.

Is there like Just going forward, Say beyond this year, are you always going to try to stick close to that two quarters, like it did feel like you let it fan up to the high end for some time, as did did many of your peers, but is that sort of is this maybe sort of like a lesson learned like we let it get too hot and we're going to stick to this too going forward? Or might there be times where I don't know you find it advantageous and run it back up Well, I think the the increase is really more rate driven We are in the environment, as Dan mentioned in his prepared remarks, with higher rates [indiscernible] [indiscernible] There were materially higher earnings on a per share basis from As you would indicate, we and also many of our peers so I think that accounted for the increase in spillover over sort of our target and different companies have different target levels. So we would readily readily say that. We're very comfortable in our plus or minus two quarters. I think that's a good healthy balance. We weren't upset that it grew incrementally, so to speak, above that balance in the last several quarters because it was again a really nice rate environment.

We just didn't want to take the total payout to an artificially high level just for a couple of quarters. We wanted to save that because we had an expectation that rates at some point would come back down So it's frankly worked and moved as we would be very comfortable with.

Awesome. Thanks so much for the color.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Maxwell Fritchard of Truist Securities. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning. I'm calling in for Mark Hughes.

You've hit on the economic topics of the day around executive orders, tariffs, etcetera.

I think more broadly, And sorry if I missed this, but as you look at your portfolio today, how do you think you're positioned relative to some of these dynamics? Yes.

Good morning, Maxwell.

Good question.

Yes, I would take a step back in some ways. I think we for multiple months now, going back even kind of before the actual election, as a firm, we're focused on on different scenarios or kind of what the impacts of things could be We're using the whole resources of the firm as we kind of think through this We have gone through Position by position both with our portfolio monitoring team, the deal teams, but actually going out to the portfolio companies themselves to think about where the tariff risk might be or where anything that might relate to government contracts could have an issue It's not a large kind of percentage of the portfolio. I think that's good news I think the thing that we're keeping our eye on is it could be material though if a certain individual name But also I would note like this whole thing is pretty dynamic. Right. In the sense of How it will really play out at the end, I think some of the conversations around tariffs FS has probably been almost a catalyst for other conversations with certain of these countries. So It's live. We've got effectively a list of names that we're and I suspect it will continue to evolve.

Yes, that's helpful color. Thank you. And then Just M and A picks up, half of this year. Wanted to get your thoughts or your views on how you expect the mix of incumbent borrowers versus new borrowers to trend over over the course of this year?

Yes. I think you're right in the sense of we talked about this at length in the prepared remarks and the Q and A. We are confident about that M and A level going up. I think that would almost by definition reduce that incumbency to the number.

I think the larger platforms do have an advantage with the size of their portfolios. Think that advantage is not even just loans that are on the books today. Right? But it's loans that you may have went to even sort of prior, but you've got the history on the company. It's loans that we might know very well from our Leveraged credit business I think that incumbency point in my mind is not just helpful an origination side, it's also helpful on a diligence side. Almost in this most simplistic format, it's easier to lend to a company than you've lent to before. But I think you should expect that number Just [indiscernible] definition of increased market activity for M and A. Probably trends down a bit on the incumbents side.

Got it.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Have a good day.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Melissa Wedel of JP JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. First one is wanting to follow-up on the fee income line item for 4Q. I take your point that a few deals slipped into it sounds like the first quarter. But even looking at the sort of average fee income over the first three quarters in the year, it was in the high teens. And for 4Q, it looks like it was less than half that.

Is there something beyond a few deals slipping into 1Q that would drive that BN some lower Yes. And I'll say and Stephen can add to this. I mean, I think that Line will have a certain amount of You can use the word volatility to it, right? It's obviously dependent on kind of new activity I think the deals in the asset backed business are not all necessarily kind of linear when they can pay distributions on.

But I would kind of continue to expect that. I do think the number was [indiscernible] respect to any historical type average, but Stephen you might want to Yes. No, that's Melissa just adding to that a bit. I think the $7,000,000 we had in the fourth quarter, as Dan mentioned in a question earlier a couple of the deals that were delayed that seven had those deals closed, probably would have been more in the 10% to 11 range I would imagine something along those lines. If you look at our long term average, it's sort of between $15,000,000 16,000,000 on a quarterly basis. Obviously, it goes above and below that. That's just the average. And Yes. So think Dan's comments about the mix of activity in the fourth quarter was more unique to it coupled with couple of deals that were delayed.

Okay.

And then Sort of related to the slipping of deals into 1Q, I mean, we're two thirds of the way through the first quarter at this point. In terms of repayment activity and exits, is there anything you can share with us Certainly, it was elevated in 4Q. Can you share how first quarter FS shaping up?

Yes. I think you're correct on [indiscernible] think everyone should expect a certain amount of additional repayments, right? You have the You have the syndicated market open, we always expect these markets to Act in some ways and sort of concert I think obviously there'll be points in time when the private markets can step in. When the syndicated markets might not be open.

But As I think we're seeing some of that I think we are seeing certain instances of deals that are being repriced or sort of a new sort of refinancing being put in place where we're taking as an opportunity to get repaid and just kind of move on.

I think you should probably expect the balance of kind of new deals versus repayments to be better in Q1. Thank you for that. And I'll throw in one last one.

Just given the tight spread environment to your point about the markets being the broadly syndicated market being open, how How urgent do you feel about relevering the Port Yes. I think urgent is probably not the right word because that would probably imply just kind of racing to do deals. I do think this is an environment where where discipline kind of matters.

I always do describe the direct lending market as there'll be certain moments when it's lender friendly, there's certain moments when it's borrower friendly, I think the theme though is always about downside protection You're underwriting a deal with a view of not having a default, but if there is a default having a high recovery rate, So it is more borrower friendly today But as I said, I think the total return sort of still remains attractive We are at the lower end of our range. I think unequivocally, I think that's a a positive thing. I think it speaks to the strength of the liability structure we have, which in these vehicles you know is very important I think you should expect that we're going to trend back up to that midpoint of the 115 over the coming quarters.

With kind of that upper range of kind of one to one in the quarter is what we've always talked about for target leverage.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn it back to Dan Petersack for closing remarks.

Well, thank you everyone for joining us today on the call. As always, we appreciate your time. If you do have any further questions or things that we didn't address on the call, please don't hesitate to reach out.

Thank you.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program.

You may now disconnect. [indiscernible]