Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. Price & Performance (HE)

Now, Scott Siu will begin with his remarks. Welcome, everyone. [indiscernible] Touching our priorities going forward. I'll then turn it over to Scott DeGuego, who will discuss the financial implications of recent announcements and walk through our financial results. We'll then open it up for questions. The past year was pivotal in the history of our company. And I'm proud of what we've been able to accomplish. Since August of twenty twenty three, we've told you that our objective is to remain a strong financially healthy enterprise best positioned to serve the communities in which we operate. This objective has guided us throughout the past eighteen months as we've taken prudent measured actions to maintain our financial strength in the wake of the Maui wildfires. In November 2024, we came together with other parties to sign final settlement agreements in the Maui wildfire tort litigation. We did so on an expedited basis. Significantly enhancing clarity for our company's path ahead. This milestone accomplishment was the culmination of months of negotiations, and once fully approved by the court, the settlement will provide an accelerated path to recovery for those impacted by [indiscernible] Throughout the year, we took numerous actions to bolster our liquidity.

And ensure HEI is in the strongest possible financial position as we work toward finalizing the settlement. The successful equity offering we closed in September resulted in $558,000,000 in net proceeds, fully funding our first payment under the settlement. We also strengthened our liquidity by putting in place a $250,000,000 ATM program at the holding company and a $250,000,000 accounts receivable backed credit facility at the utility. With these collective actions, we ended 2024 in the strongest liquidity position in our company's history. In late December, we completed the strategic review process for American Savings Bank. This transaction was the result of a deliberate and thoughtful process involving numerous potential buyers. After evaluating a range of factors, including transaction certainty, proceeds, regulatory considerations and potential stakeholder impacts our Board concluded that selling the bank to a group of independent investors was the best step forward. Our sale of 90.1% of our bank simplifies HEI's strategy and allows us to focus on our core utility business, The proceeds will be used to reduce holding company debt strengthening our balance sheet and increasing financial flexibility going forward. Following the Maui wildfires, we also said that the utility would quickly implement enhanced wildfire safety measures.

While working closely with the community and other stakeholders, to develop an updated long term wildfire safety strategy. In 2024, the utility implemented impactful measures on an expedited basis and just last month submitted its updated long term wildfire safety strategy which I'll discuss in more detail shortly. I'd add that the achievements made to progress the utilities wildfire safety strategy were made while continuing to progress another key strategic initiative. Integrating increasing amounts of renewables on the utilities grid. The utility achieved a 36% renewable portfolio standard in 2024, up from 33% in 2023. This keeps Hawaiian Electric on track to reach its interim goal of 40% RPS by 02/1930. The utility was able to achieve this milestone while reducing customer rates. And the average residential bill decreased 7% in 2024. And finally, our utility is continuing its efforts at the Hawaii State Legislature to pursue creation of a wildfire recovery fund and a mechanism to support independent power producer financing of clean energy projects. I'd emphasize that it's still early in the legislative process and our legislature is juggling a number of complicated issues this year. However, I'm pleased that the high level of engagement among so many in Hawaii to address these critical Turning to the next slide, we remain deeply committed to advancing wildfire mitigation efforts.

And since launching and expanded wildfire safety strategy in the wake of the Maui wildfires, the utility has rapidly advanced efforts to reduce the risk of wildfires. In 2024 alone, the utility invested approximately $120,000,000 to make wildfire safety improvements.

In 2024, our utility launch a public safety power shutoff program tested and replaced thousands of utility poles, upgraded miles of overhead power lines, cleared intrusive vegetation near electrical equipment and installed weather stations and AI assisted high definition video cameras across our service territories. These initiatives reflect our ongoing dedication to supporting Hawaii's resilience and safety in the face of increasingly severe weather events. I'm pleased that we were able to make such substantial strides in 2024 to reduce the risk of wildfires ignited by utility equipment. In January, the utility filed an updated wildfire safety strategy with the PUC.

The updated strategy builds upon the immediate actions taken in response to the August 2023 wildfires. And establishes a three year action plan for 2025 through 2027. The cost of the plan is estimated at about $450,000,000 with approximately $400,000,000 expected to be capital expenditures. The ultimate objective of the plan is to identify and implement measures that can accomplish the greatest risk reduction while balancing affordability and reliability for our communities. The utility's approach to accomplish this is detailed on Slide five. I'd note that implementation of the wildfire safety strategy will be an evolving process which will include annual updates to the PUC and ongoing assessments of wildfire risk, mitigation measures, Lastly, I'll note that on February 6, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the proceeding to resolve the outstanding issues with insurers who filed segregation claims related to the twenty twenty three Maui wildfires. Just a few days later on February 10, the court issued a unanimous decision in our favor. The court's decision aligns with our position on key questions It clarifies that once the settlement becomes final, insurers seeking to recover amounts paid to settling plaintiffs cannot separately sue defendants. We're pleased that the court's decision aligns with our arguments and was issued on an accelerated timeline.

The decision helps move the settlement for bringing increased certainty to those who suffered loss in the Maui wildfires while providing more clarity for our company's path toward reestablishing financial stability. This was a key step in finalizing the settlement. And the Second Circuit Court in Maui can now consider the settlement agreements for final judicial approval. We expect our first payment obligation under the settlement to become due late this year or early next. In summary, with our simpler, more focused business model, strong liquidity position and measures in place to protect against the risk of catastrophic weather events going forward we believe we're well positioned to continue executing on our priorities. Looking ahead, we'll continue to focus on obtaining supportive legislation finalizing and implementing the settlement agreement in the Maui Wildfire Tort litigation and ultimately returning to investment grade. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Scott DeGuego. Thank you, Scott. Turning to Slide seven, I'll first touch briefly on the previously announced ASV transaction. At the end of twenty twenty four, we closed on the sale of 90.1% of ASB for $4.00 $5,000,000 based on a total valuation of $450,000,000 We are pleased to have completed this transaction in the timeline that we did with simultaneous signing and closing.

The structure allowed us to avoid lengthy and uncertain regulatory reviews. The net proceeds of approximately $380,000,000 will be used to pay down holding company debt.

ASB's 2024 results are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. For the full year 2024, the net loss from discontinued operations totaled $103,000,000 compared to net income of $53,000,000 in 2023. The $103,000,000 loss includes a net loss on the sale transaction of approximately $116,000,000 which is net of a $2,400,000 tax benefit. Excluding wildfire expenses, the goodwill impairment recorded in the second quarter and the net loss recorded due to the sale transaction ASB's core net income for 2024 was $79,000,000 The remainder of my comments on the quarter's results will focus on our continuing operations. For the full year 2024, we generated a loss from continuing operations of $1,300,000,000 The results include wildfire settlement accruals of $1,900,000,000 pretax as well as the impacts of other Maui wildfire related expenses. The results also include the $35,000,000 asset impairment recorded at Pacific Current.

In the third quarter.

Excluding these items, consolidated core net income was $124,000,000 compared to $152,000,000 in 2023. Utility core net income was $181,000,000 compared to 195,000,000 in 2023.

The decrease in utility core net income was driven by higher O and M expenses which included increased wildfire prevention related expenses such as vegetation management. Holding company core net loss was $56,000,000 compared to $43,000,000 in 2023.

The higher core net loss was driven by lower Pacific Current net income due to outages of both the Hamakua Mahipapa generating facilities. Turning to our liquidity on the next slide. As of the end of the fourth quarter, the holding company and the utility had approximately $566,000,000 and $184,000,000 of unrestricted cash on hand, respectively. The holding company cash balance includes the approximately $380,000,000 from the ASP sale that will be used to retire debt. In addition, dollars $479,000,000 has been set aside in a wholly owned subsidiary created for the specific purpose of holding the first installment payment pursuant to the Maui wildfire settlement. This is included in restricted cash on the balance sheet.

Looking ahead, we will continue to prudently manage our liquidity as we work through finalizing the settlement and as we formulate financing plans for future settlement payments, and utility capital expenditure needs. At that, let's open up the call to questions.

Your first question comes from Mike Loonigan with Core.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Hi, Mike. Hawaiian Supreme Court issued their ruling that the insurers can't bring their separate legal action against the defendants.

Was just wondering if you could talk about your confidence level that the settlement will proceed forward without any more interference from the insurance companies, whether the case be appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court or if the insurers try to make other arguments, maybe they try to say the settlement was reached in bad faith or pursue another avenue to disrupt it.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Mike. So The bottom line upfront, the conclusion of the Hawaii Supreme Court decision, that was a very positive and a major step towards finalizing the settlement agreement. So we're really, really pleased with the outcome.

We are awaiting for the written order to come from the Supreme Court, which will probably be issued in the coming weeks. At some point, we'll move to dismiss the subrogation insurers taking into account the Hawaii Supreme Court ruling. No, I can't really say when we would time that motion. We're still considering the timing on that motion.

Next steps going forward to finalize the settlement through the court would be we expect class and individual plaintiffs to announce their agreement on how they're allocating the aggregate settlement amount between the Class Fund and the Individual Fund And after that occurs, then the class will move for preliminary approval. And once that's granted, begin the notice process. After that is there's going to be an opportunity for claimants to opt out or object to the class settlement. Obtain good faith settlement determinations and final class approval. So in terms of timing, we expect preliminary approval in the second quarter. Objection and opt out deadlines to be in the third quarter, and the approval hearing to be in the fourth quarter of twenty twenty five. Of course, timing of all of this could shift. So, but let me get back to the overall our outcome and confidence level. So obvious, this is the outcome we're hoping for. And it's just a matter of working through the process now.

Got it. Thanks. And then on CapEx, you highlighted you're going to invest nearly $400,000,000 in wildfire state deal over the next few years. I think you previously said your maintenance capital is about $300,000,000 a year. Just wondered if you could share what your total investment level we should expect over the next few years and what rate base growth that could drive and then then also how we should think about your FFO to debt target as you finance the settlement payments? Okay. Mike, I'm going to have Paul Ito, CFO, respond to your question.

Hey, Mike. Thanks for the question. So right now, we are currently refining our three year capital forecast in light of the recently wildfire safety strategy. And in addition, we're preparing for a potential rate case.

And this refinement process includes number one, prioritizing the projects and then number two, assessing the availability and cost of resources both internal and external So subject to the foregoing caveats, Over the three years, we do expect an increasing level of potential CapEx For 2025, we're targeting to be moderately higher. Than 2024, probably in the $350,000,000 to $375,000,000 In 2026 and 2027, we do have additional opportunities for CapEx. So as you mentioned, our baseline CapEx would be the first layer. That's again in the $300,000,000 range. We talked about the wildfire safety strategy in terms of $400,000,000 roughly over the three years. But in addition to that, we also have approved EPRM projects that we would start work on. There are a number of those projects. The largest ones include our Layao repowering project. It's a two sixty three megawatt Repowering, We have our Wayana Hawaiian project Army privatization and some resilience work. But In aggregate, if you take all of those together, these projects would generally add roughly call it, dollars $150,000,000 to $175,000,000 in 2026 and then somewhere in the range of $200,000,000 to $250,000,000 in 2027. So again, subject to resource availability, but in broad strokes, that's the level of CapEx that we're we're forecasting.

In addition to that, we do have some additional EPRN projects that are not approved. Of course, subject to approval by the So, again, rough estimates, but I think it gives you a general sense of our CapEx plan going forward. And then I'll turn it over to Scott to talk about the FFO to debt question.

Yes. On the FFO side, we're not going to give you like a specific target other than to say we're going target investment grade credit ratings. And so I think you understand what that means from an FFO to debt per perspective. And if you look historically where we were I think, higher than the peers and we're just going to try and stay in the allowed ranges from all three of the agencies, again, to maintain or at least not maintain, but target an investment grade rating.

Got it. Thanks. And then lastly for me, in the Hawaii legislative session, I know it's early, with some concern about customer bills, there is an amended version of House Bill nine eighty two that proposes that about roughly half of the $1,000,000,000 Wildfire Insurance Fund will be financed by shareholders with the other half by customers through securitization.

I was just wondering based on your plans to finalize finance the settlement with a combination of debt and equity in your goal to return to investment grade, In a scenario such as this, where you have to finance $500,000,000 plus on behalf of investors. Obviously large relative to the size of your company, would you think about financing it? Anything you can share there?

Mike, like I said in my earlier comments, it is very early in the process and there's a lot of debate going on.

I'll note that in the most recent version of that bill, the actual amounts that would possibly be coming from shareholders was was blanked out. So me, it's an indication that it is early in the process. I think it's fair to say that everybody, including the utility is very focused on impacts of on customers. We'll just have to see how this plays out.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Mike. Thanks, Mike.

Your next question comes from Julien Dumoulin Smith of Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon team. Thank you guys very much for the time. I appreciate it. Thanks, Julian. Hi. Hey, afternoon. Hey, just wanted to pick up on that last point there. I just wanted to understand how you guys are thinking about framing the wildfire legislation maybe perhaps firstly you're building stakeholder support. We got a crossover date coming here in the next handful of weeks. Can you speak to a little bit about your successes thus far on that front? I'll note for instance, the senator who seemingly prevented this bill last time from coming out of committee has sponsored the new iteration. I find that notable. And then separately, obviously, last quarter, you didn't have the settlement in hand. And so presumably that should have unlocked a separate set of pathways and stakeholders, but be very curious to see how you would set expectations [indiscernible] what the major building blocks are that are viable and then B, process and what we should be expecting on these upcoming crossover dates? I think the first one is on March 6, if I got it right.

Yes. So the way I think about it, Julian, is yes, there has been a lot of positive momentum, especially when we compare against where we were last year, last session. Right? We a year ago, we didn't know what the outcome settlement discussions would be. We weren't quite sure in terms of our overall how quickly we could move through the litigation process and so on. So where we are today is in a much more Positive stance and there's a lot more clarity. So with that, that's provided the basis for these discussions to resume in the legislature. And yes, there are always going to be some pretty tough questions coming about in terms of how do we manage impacts on customers, How do we balance the needs of of our customers, our shareholders, while we still are moving towards strengthening the financial positioning of the company so that we can continue to provide service So those are all swirling around during these legislative discussions right now.

The way that I will always remind people is that we fully expect that we have to have these discussions where we are right now in the process at the legislature. Yes, it was very I think it was a very positive sign that our state senator was willing to reintroduce the bill And again, it's to tee up the discussion, to debate the issues, I think it was very positive when you read the introductions to those bills in terms of the recognition why establishment of something like a wildfire recovery fund is good policy and will provide benefits for customers, for the company and the state of Hawaii. So I think that what we'd expect is that there's going to be continued ongoing debate and we'll be participating in that There are certain elements of the legislation that are very important to us in order to have the benefits of balancing the risk to customers as well as to shareholders. We'll just be part of that process. And [indiscernible] I'm just very, very pleased in terms of like I said earlier, the fact that we are in the mix, we have these bills going forward and we're having a debate.

And maybe just as a follow-up, if we can address securitization direct I mean, obviously, the rating agencies have taken a fairly hard line on the subject. I mean, can you speak a little bit to the prospect of getting something that would suffice with the agencies here and maybe speak to that issue a little bit further both in terms of the prospects in process here in the legislature as well as to the nuances of exactly what is being pursued agencies at this point in time.

We can get another Yes. Well, let me comment first on with the perspective of the legislative discussions regarding securitization.

I think given all the discussion that started last session and have continued to this year, I think there is a a fairly good understanding now of why securitization makes a lot of sense in terms of being able to secure lower cost financing, which ultimately goes towards benefiting our customers. So I think that's a positive. As far as your the second part of your question, what are the expectations of the rating agencies? I'll have Scott DeGuego comment on that.

Yes. I think that the agencies, all three of them, want to see some sort of backstop fund among other things. To enhance ratings, again, to Scott's earlier point, I think it's too early in the process from a legislative process standpoint to determine where that's going to shake out. And if we get it, it's obviously credit positive. Or if we get some sort of bill that resembles what's been introduced in the legislature, it will be credit positive.

And if we don't, we'll just continue to work with the rating agencies and develop a plan to get to investment grade as best we possibly can. Again, I think it's just too soon to speculate.

Yes, absolutely.

And just in terms of creating a pathway here, for funding, I know that you said a second ago it was blanked out in the September about shareholder funding. But can you speak to I mean, Scott, you've been very diligent thus far in in managing the company through this difficult period. In terms of ensuring an ongoing access to capital and more specifically a cash flow positive backdrop for the core company. You think about the financing need, providing a clear clear latitude through the near and medium terms to find resolution here. Out of this all?

Yes. And again, we haven't given any direct guidance in terms of how we'll fund the balance of the settlement payments as we've said on previous calls. But as we go forward, we're continuously looking at the capital markets. We have, in my opinion, strong access that was demonstrated by the equity deal that was done in September, which you know was well oversubscribed. The utility refunded the $50,000,000 maturity that they had coming due In January, they did that prior to the end of the year.

We've had a number of firms reach out to us on refinance We've had a number of firms reach out to us on refinancing the $50,000,000 that comes due at HEI in December. And we're receiving inbounds quite regularly on what's going on in the capital markets are access both to the debt and the equity market. So I feel very confident about our access going forward. And again, we've prefunded that payment approximately a year in advance. And so we really have a lot of time To continue to develop our thoughts around how we'll finance The balance of those payments Right. Let me ask that maybe more directly here. There's no equity raise contemplated at least in the medium term from what I can tell based on what you would need barring any changes like the legislature?

Yes. The answer to that question is yes. We don't have any anticipated equity raises. And we don't have any anticipated drawdowns or use on the ATM Thank you so much for that clarity. I really appreciate you being transparent about Thank you so much. Thanks, Julie. This concludes the question and answer session. I'll turn the call to Scott Su for closing remarks.

To everybody for calling in today. So in closing, 2024 was a year of really significant achievements. In the face of unprecedented challenges facing our company. I really feel that we've made rapid progress towards rebuilding the financial strength of our enterprise.

And again, just want to highlight that with the recent favorable Supreme Court decision, we're well positioned to navigate the path ahead. Again, I want to thank our shareholders, a great many of whom are our neighbors here in Hawaii. For your continued investment in HEI. We greatly appreciate your support as we continue to help our communities move forward.

This concludes today's conference call.