Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. Price & Performance (IVR)

Addition to today's press release, we have provided the presentation and the covers the topics we plan to address today. The press release and This information can be found by going to the Investor Relations section of the website. Our presentation today will include forward looking statements and certain non GAAP financial measures. Regarding these statements and measures as well as the appendix for the appropriate reconciliations to GAAP. Finally, Invesco Mortgage Capital is not responsible for and is not edit or guarantee the accuracy of our earnings teleconference transcripts provided by third parties. The only authorized webcasts are located on our website. Again, welcome Thank you for joining us today. I'll now turn the call over to IVR's CEO, John Anzalone. Good morning and welcome to Invesco Mortgage Capital's fourth quarter earnings call. I'll provide some brief comments before turning the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Brian Norris. To discuss our portfolio in more detail. Joining us on the call this morning for Q and A are President, Kevin Collins our COO, Dave Wyle and our CFO, Mark Gregson. Long term treasury yields ended the quarter sharply higher as the disinflation fresh uncertainty regarding the impacts of future monetary, fiscal and trade policies.

Expectations for future inflation rose over the course of the quarter with the two year breakeven ending the year at 252.54% up from 1.77% in September.

This trend has continued into this year the two year breakeven is now comfortably above 3%. These uncertainties combined with the robust labor market led to a recalibration of the market's expectations for future monetary policy. Following 100 basis points of reductions in the Federal Funds target rate over the course of the third and fourth quarters. Fed funds futures markets expectations as of year end 2024 reflected only one to two additional cuts in the target rate through the end of twenty twenty five. This compares to an expectation of 10 cuts through the end of twenty twenty five priced in as recently as mid September. Again, this macroeconomic backdrop, Agency RMBS underperformed treasuries during the fourth quarter. Underperformance during the quarter primarily took place in lower coupons, the sharp move higher interest rates, limited demand for discount securities. Although industry volatility moved higher during the quarter, supply and demand technicals for higher coupon agency mortgages were supported as supply was limited while bank and overseas demand [indiscernible] [indiscernible] largely remained at low levels given limited housing activity and elevated mortgage rates. Premiums on higher coupon specified pool collateral of the remain relatively well supported as implied financing via the dollar roll market Invesco TBA investments remained largely unattractive throughout the quarter.

Agency CMBS risk premiums contracted notably during the fourth quarter given increased optimism regarding renewed bank demand for stable cash flow profiles amidst elevated interest rate volatility in Against this backdrop, book value per common share decreased 4.8% to $8.92 per share and when combined with our $0.4 per share common stock dividend, resulted in an economic return of a negative 0.5% for the quarter. As mentioned in 2025, we agency mortgage performance has been modestly positive. With interest rate volatility stabilizing as the market's outlook for future monetary policy has coalesced around one or two additional cuts from the FOMC this year. As of 02/14/2025, we Improved our capital structure and reduced our cost of capital by funding the redemption of our Series B preferred stock in December primarily with lower cost repurchase agreements. As a result, our debt to equity ratio increased to 6.7 times at the end of the fourth quarter, up from 6.1 times at the end of the third quarter. At the end of the year, approximately 85% of our $5,400,000,000 investment portfolio was invested in agency mortgages and 15% was in invested in agency CMBS. And we maintained a sizable balance of unrestricted cash and unencumbered investments totaling $389,000,000 Our earnings available for distribution declined from $0.68 in the third quarter to $0.53 in the fourth quarter Invesco we recognized a one time charge associated In addition, we diversified the composition of our interest rate hedges reducing our exposure to changes in swap spreads by increasing our allocation to U. S. Treasury futures While this negatively impacted our effective net interest income for the quarter, we stand to benefit from future normalization of the yield curve.

In the near term, we remain cautious on agency mortgages as shifting expectations for monetary and fiscal policy may result in elevated interest rate volatility reducing investor demand. Our long term outlook for agency mortgage is favorable however, as we expect demand to improve in higher coupons given attractive valuations eventual decline in interest rate volatility and a steep reoccur. Lastly, we expect a gradual increase in age ATMC CMBS new issuance to be met with robust investor demand. As the sector continues to offer value relative to other fixed income investments due to its prepayment protection and attractive risk adjusted return profiles. Now I'll turn the call over to Brian to go through the portfolio in more detail. Thanks, John, and good morning to everyone listening to the call. I'll begin on Slide four, which provides an overview of the interest rates and mortgage markets. As shown on the chart in the upper left, during the fourth quarter, U. S. Treasury yields rose across the yield curve. With two year and longer maturities increasing between sixty and eighty five basis points. Most of the increase occurred in the first half of the quarter. Driven by market expectations of a Republican sweep in the November elections.

The chart on the bottom left provides Fed funds futures market pricing since the beginning of [indiscernible] The number of cuts to the Fed funds target rate in 2024 was much less than projected at the beginning of the year. As economic growth employment and inflation data proved to be more resilient than anticipated, The market is now pricing in only one or two cuts 2025 along with a much higher terminal rate over the next few years. The chart in the upper right reflects changes in the short term funding rates over the past year. During the fourth quarter, funding rates declined in line with monetary policy easing. But repo rates exhibited some volatility at year end. Positively, the repo market has normalized since year end, with one month agency 20 to SOFR plus 15 basis points. Lastly, the bottom right chart details Agency MBS holdings by the Federal Reserve and U. S. Run off of the Fed's balance sheet continues with agency RMBS declining by approximately $15,000,000,000 to $20,000,000,000 per month. One is it is tightening is expected to persist at the current pace in the near term. Potentially ending in the second half of twenty twenty five.

U. S. Banks added nearly $50,000,000,000 to their portfolios in the second half twenty twenty four and we expect bank demand for agency RMBS to continue at a notable pace as deregulation and steeper yield curve provides an attractive environment for deployment of deposits. Slide five provides more detail on the H2 mortgage market. In the upper left chart, we show thirty year current coupon performance versus U. S. Treasury since year end. Highlighting the fourth quarter in gray. Current coupons underperformed during the quarter due to a sharp rise in interest rates. This increase in interest rate volatility reduced investor demand for agency mortgages. Addition, nominal spreads on current coupons were quite volatile in the first half of the fourth quarter, but have stabilized over the last couple of months.

Due to decreased interest rate volatility and favorable supply and demand dynamics. In the chart on the upper right, we show specified pool pay ups over the past year which declined since the end of the third quarter as prepayment protection became less valuable as mortgage rates remained elevated. Lastly, as shown in the lower right chart, funding via the dollar roll market for TBS securities has improved with implied funding rates lower than SOFR across several coupons.

While we continue to prefer specified pools over TBA given their more predictable prepayment behavior, The improvement in the dollar roll market for TBS securities has reduced the difference in returns compared to specified pools funded via REITA.

Slide six details our ACR MES investments and summarizes Invesco investment portfolio changes during the quarter. Our HCRMBS portfolio decreased 11% quarter over quarter as we sold a portion of our lower coupon specified pools to manage leverage early in the fourth quarter, and to fund purchases in Agency CMBS. Overall, we remain focused in higher in higher coupon agency RMBS which should see greater benefit from a decline in interest rate volatility and are largely insulated from direct exposure to assets held by commercial banks and on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet.

We focus our specified pool allocation on prepayment characteristics that are expected to perform well in both premium and discount environments with our largest concentration in lower loan balance collateral giving more predictable prepayments. We increased our allocation to specified pools with low credit score borrowers during the particularly as we added to higher coupons given the attractive relative value in lower pay up stories and higher coupons. Although we anticipate interest rate volatility to remain moderately elevated in the near term, We believe current valuations on production coupon agency RMBS largely reflect the and continue to represent attractive investment opportunities. With current gross ROEs in the mid to high teens.

Slide seven provides detail on our agency CMBS portfolio. We purchased $181,000,000 at the beginning of the fourth quarter, bringing our exposure to the asset class to approximately 15% of our total investment [indiscernible] We believe Agency CMBS offers many benefits.

Mainly through its prepayment protection and fixed maturities. Reduced our sensitivity to interest rate volatility. Gross ROEs on our new purchases were in the low double digits and we have been disappointed on adding exposure only when the relative value and agency RMBS Accurately reflects their different risks. Financing capacity has been robust as we have been able to finance our purchases with multiple counterparties at attractive levels. We will continue to monitor the sector for opportunities to increase our allocation as they become available recognizing the overall benefits of the portfolio as the sector diversifies risks, associated with an HSE RMBS portfolio.

Our HSE CMO allocation is detailed alongside our remaining credit our allocation to both agency interest only and credit securities remain largely unchanged $71,000,000 allocated to Agency IO, and $17,000,000 allocated to credit at quarter end.

Although we anticipate limited near term price appreciation in these investments, we believe they provide attractive yields for unlevered holdings.

We with returns in the high single digits. [indiscernible] Slide nine details our funding and hedge book at quarter end. Repurchase agreements collateralized by our agency RMBS and Agency CMBS investments declined from $5,200,000,000 dollars to $4,900,000,000 consistent with a modest decrease in our total assets. While the total notional of our hedges increased from $4,300,000,000 to 4,700,000,000.0 The decrease in our repo balance and increase in our hedge notional resulted in a higher hedge ratio for the quarter. From 83% to 95%. Reflecting our expectation of fewer cuts in the Fed funds target rate in 2025. The table on the right provides further detail on our hedges at year end. We continue to increase our hedge exposures in treasury futures, during the fourth quarter as we sought to decrease our exposure to swap spreads, At year end, our notional balance of treasury futures was was 30% of the total hedge notional balance. From 11% at the end of the third quarter. Slide 10 provides more detail on our capital structure. And highlights the improvements made in the fourth quarter subsequent to the redemption of our Series B preferred stock.

Redemption was funded largely via an increase in repurchase agreements which have a lower cost of capital than our Series B preferred stock.

Further improvement in the capital structure remains a focus of ours as we seek to reduce our cost of capital and improve shareholder returns.

To conclude our prepared remarks, financial markets were quite volatile in the fourth quarter as investors began to price in greater monetary and fiscal policy uncertainty, but our focus in higher coupon agency RMBS and increased allocation to Agency CMBS mitigated much of this impact and resulted in an economic return of negative 0.5%. Positively, this volatility has dissipated thus far in 2025, providing a supportive backdrop for our investments. And resulting in an increase in our book value of approximately 2% excluding the dividend accrual as of last Friday. We believe IVR is well positioned to navigate current mortgage market volatility given our moderate leverage and robust liquidity. We continue to selectively capitalize on historically attractive agency RMBS spreads and believe the sector is poised to perform well as interest rate volatility continues to moderate. Our liquidity position provides substantial cushion for further potential market stress while also providing capital to to deploying to our target assets as the investment environment improves. In addition, we believe further easing of monetary policy will lead to a steeper yield curve and decline in interest rate volatility. Both of which provide a supportive backdrop for H2 mortgages as they improve demand from commercial banks, overseas investors Invesco, [indiscernible] Thank you for your continued support for Invesco Mortgage Capital Now we will open the line for Q and A. Thank you.

We will now begin the question and answer session. Our first question comes from Doug Harter with UBS. Your line is open.

Thanks. I'm hoping you could talk about how you're viewing kind of the risk reward trade off of agency RMBS and agency CMBS especially in light of the current dividend level. Yeah. Hey, Doug, it's Brian. Yeah. We are If you go back to Slide seven, you can see when spreads are on Agency CMDS, are in the kind of high fifty-sixty area. That tends to be relatively attractive versus where mortgages were. So we did add most of our agency CMBS exposure kind of at the beginning of the fourth quarter. But as spreads tightened, from there, it became a bit less attractive, particularly as agency mortgages were underperforming during that time. That difference has certainly compressed here in the first quarter. Agency CVS spreads are just a touch wider.

While HCM mortgages have performed pretty well. So So I think the benefits that Agency CMBS provides to our portfolio are still still supportive. But given that volatility has declined pretty notably here so far in the first quarter, [indiscernible] certainly towards Agency RMBS at the at the current time. Great.

And I guess with that blend and kind of where all spreads are? Can you just talk about your your comfort in the current dividend level? Yes, Doug, it's John. Hi. I mean, obviously, Our board recommends it or we recommend our dividend report Board approves it, that will happen over the next month.

I mean, we look at a number of factors. And foremost is where our current and near term to medium term projected ROEs are on Invesco. So I mean that's the the first thing. You can also look at where average sort of ROEs have been more historically over a longer timeframe. And then also look at sort of the competitive environment where dividend yields are for that. So I mean those are all things we're going to be taking a look at as we move over the course of the next month.

Look, to Brian's point, I think we are pretty selective about where we add agency CMBS. So we're not adding it much, much lower than where we're seeing [indiscernible] I mean, it's obviously the ROEs are a little bit lower because they don't have a convexity risk, so they should be a little bit lower. But that's kind of how we're looking at. Great. I appreciate the answers. Thank you. Our next question comes from Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Your line is open.

Hey, thanks.

On the changes you made to the hedge book this quarter, In the early part of this year so far, there's been a bit of a reversal in swap spreads. Can you sort of generally talk about how you guys are thinking about swap spreads going forward? And if you foresee making any incremental changes to the mix of the hedge position? Thanks, Trevor. It's Brian.

Yes, certainly there are trade offs between the two. Given that swaps spreads are currently negative, the hedging with them is a bit cheaper, so ROEs are better when you hedge with swaps. [indiscernible] certainly, volatility that we've seen in swap spreads over the past year or two adds adds more volatility to that hedging as well. So Like I said, at the end of twenty twenty four, we were at 30% treasury futures. I think that's probably the high end given the current environment of where we'd like to be. We have seen swap spreads widen so far in 2025. It's, Swast Spreads did tighten a lot in 2024, just given the expectation that treasury issuance would be substantial as we move forward here. There's some uncertainty there. I think lot of things that have happened so far in 2025 is just that the new administration is maybe little bit slower to roll out some of the things that were once feared So you've seen volatility come down, swap spreads have widened a bit. So So there are trade offs. Like I said, I think we would target probably 20% to 30% of treasury futures in the current environment.

So we're right in that that range currently. So as we move forward, I think we'll still be monitoring swap spreads obviously, but again where they are now, I think we're pretty comfortable with where we are. Okay, got it. Appreciate the comments. Thank you.

Thank you. As a reminder, Our next question comes from Jason Stewart with Janney. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thanks. I wanted to dig in a little bit more into your cautious outlook on Agency Mortgage and maybe if you could talk a little bit more about whether that's a rate driven outlook or there's a component of GSE reform baked into that cautious outlook. And maybe on the latter, if you do have a view on what priced into the basis in terms of GSE reform risk, that'd be helpful. Hey, thanks Jason. It's Brian. Yes, I'll tackle GSE reform right off the bat here. I think the market has not reacted at all to the headlines so far that we've seen on that topic. Mortgage spreads have tightened, so that to the extent that there is any concern out there, it doesn't seem to be reflected. I think I think that's notable because The market is essentially saying that the only thing that would really materially impact Agency mortgage spreads would be a loss of the implicit or explicit guarantee on mortgages and And that remains an extremely remote scenario at this point. So So I think spreads have responded according [indiscernible] This current time. Our cautiousness is I mean, like I said, volatility has come down quite a bit in 2025.

Mortgage spreads have tightened. So I think there's still a fair amount of monetary and fiscal policy uncertainty out there. Trade policy uncertainty, So I think we're just with leverage To our comment right around nine I think we're comfortable in that situation. We're spreads are attractive still. We can still earn attractive ROEs, like I said, in the mid to high teens at that level. So think [indiscernible] We're kind of we're not overly cautious. We still think mortgages will perform well through the year. But just given where we are right now, I think mortgages have had a pretty good start to the year. So It's just a matter of whether volatility will continue to trend lower or if it kind of pauses and goes the other way?

Got it. Okay. That's helpful.

And then you referenced the refunding of the Series B, moving that to repo. I mean, I guess the question is a big fish question. Is the right way to look at or how are you looking at preferred today as a part of the capital structure Is it more permanent capital in your mind? Should we be looking at that as leverage to preferred plus common? Has that shifted the way that you look at the capital structure? Has that shifted over the last year? Hey, it's John. Yes, no, I don't think it's shifted. I mean, we're still I think if you look at us historically, our portfolio mix was very different when we had when we put on the preferreds. We had there was time we had loan loans involved, we had, securitizations, different asset classes. They made a little bit more sense to having [indiscernible] then post COVID, it just became too much percentage of our our capital structure. So I think [indiscernible] still targeting we'd like to get [indiscernible] 20% ish range. I think most of our peers are in around that range or about less even. At this So we're still targeting that So that will be a combination of ATM or equity issuance or and or continuing to chip away at repurchasing the preferred Series Cs.

Thanks.

Thank you. At this time, we have no further questions. Speakers, I'll hand the call back to you.

Great.

You very much, operator, and thank you everybody for joining the call today. Have a great day.