And thank you for joining our twenty twenty five first quarter earnings call. With me on the call today Nick Bryan and Matthew Siegel. After a discussion of our financial results, we'll open the lines for a question and answer session. Our comments today will refer to the earnings release and slide presentation that you can find on the Investor Relations section of our website, outfront.com. After today's call is concluded, an audio archived replay will be available there as well. This conference call may include forward looking statements. Relevant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward looking statements are listed in our earnings materials and in our SEC filings, including our 2024 Form 10 ks, as well as our Q1 twenty twenty five Form 10 Q which we expect to file tomorrow. We will refer to certain non GAAP financial measures on this call. Any references to OIBDA made today will be on an adjusted basis. Reconciliations of OIBDA and other non GAAP financial measures are in the appendix of the slide presentation the earnings release, and on our website. Which also includes presentations with prior period reconciliations. With that, let me turn the call over to Nick.

Thanks, Stephane. And good afternoon, everyone. Before getting into the numbers, I'd like to share some thoughts on my first few months in the executive role at Outfront. And some of the plans we have started to put into action. The biggest and most important thing I've learned since stepping into lead Outfront is that this company is built on extremely strong foundations. To drive positive business outcomes for our clients. Over the past ten weeks, I've talked with most agency major agency partners and the trade industry organizations as well as met with many important advertisers and Outfront employees across The US. Our continued growth whether at a national, regional or local level, will be determined by our ability to innovate build leading brands and drive sales for our customers. To ensure that our company continues to strengthen our foundations, we are focusing as a management team on four strategic imperatives. First, we're focused on optimizing our sales strategies and ways of working. Second, we continue to modernize our workflow and processes Third, we're focused on driving new demand from non out of home advertisers in high spending industry categories. And finally, we are demanding the highest standards of operational excellence across the organization.

As I mentioned on the last call, I remain convinced there is significant potential to unlock within the company and we have started on a path to deliver on these objectives. Now turning to our quarter one results. The headline numbers of which you can see on Slide three, organic revenues grew slightly broadly in line with our guidance that we provided in February. While OIBDA was $64,000,000 and AFFO was 24,000,000 Slide four shows us segment results. Billboard revenues which includes a two percentage point headwind from the exit of a large marginally profitable New York billboard contract late last year, were down nine 1%. Transit grew 2.6%, with strong growth in the New York MTA being offset by weakness at other franchises particularly LA buses. Other revenues, which now principally consists of low margin digital equipment sales, grew by about $2,000,000 Slide five shows our detailed billboard revenue.

The 1% decline was primarily due to previously mentioned New York contract [indiscernible] The revenues and expenses of which are still included in our reported 2024 financial statements. Digital billboard revenues were up 5.4%, while static revenues were down about 3.5%. I'd like to quickly shout out the South which was our strongest billboard region. Slide six shows our detailed transit revenue. The 3% top line growth was driven by nearly 11% growth in our digital revenues, which were partially offset by a 3.4% decline in our static revenues. The New York MTA outpaced the consolidated transit growth rate growing by about 10% during the quarter. On a consolidated revenue basis, our stronger category during the quarter were legal, utilities and financial. Weaker categories during the quarter were health and medical, government and political and CPG.

Slide seven shows our combined digital revenue performance, which grew almost 7% in the quarter, and represented nearly 33% of total organic revenues up from about 31% last year. Programmatic and digital direct automated sales were up nearly 20% during the period, and represented 16% of total digital revenues up from 14.5% in the same period last year. The breakdown of local and national revenues can be seen on Slide eight. Local was down 3% year on year during the quarter, with growth in New York City Transit being more than offset by weakness in billboard. National grew 4% during the first quarter, driven by improved creative efforts on advertising sales specifically around the Super Bowl.

Slide nine shows our solid billboard yield growth.

Which was up about 2% year on year to over $2,600 per month. The drivers of this were digital yield growth and our continued digital conversions. Increasing our percentage of inventory that is now digitized.

With only about 5% of our total billboard inventory digital, and accelerated growth in automatic revenues that I described earlier we see significant room for continued growth. Summing up, [indiscernible] quarter one was broadly in line with our expectations despite an uncertain economic climate. With that, let me now hand it over to Matt to review the rest of our financials. Thanks, Nick, and good afternoon, everybody. For a deeper dive into our financial statements, please turn to Slide 10, for a more detailed look at our billboard expenses. In total, billboard expenses were down just over $5,000,000 or 2.4% year over year.

This decline includes an approximate 200 basis point impact from the edge of exit of the large marginally profitable billboard contract late last year that Nick mentioned earlier. Zooming in on billboard lease costs, these were down over $6,000,000 or about 6% due primarily to that billboard portfolio exit and also lower payments and revenue share leases. Posting maintenance and other expenses were down about $1,000,000 or 2.5% due to lower maintenance and utilities costs, and lower posting and rotation costs. Partially offset by higher compensation related expenses. SG and A expenses rose about $2,000,000 or 3.2% due to higher compensation related expenses including salaries and commissions and a higher allowance for bad debt. This $5,000,000 improvement in total billboard expenses combined with the small decline in billboard revenues Nick described earlier, led to billboard adjusted OIBDA rising about $2,000,000 or 2%. We are pleased to see billboard adjusted OIBDA margin increase again this time by 100 basis points year over year to 31.9%, helped by recent portfolio management efforts.

Before moving to transit, I'd like to talk about another billboard portfolio we will be exiting in the middle of the second quarter. As we described last year, we are focusing on improving exiting contracts with limited financial benefit to Outfront and its shareholders. Consistent with that philosophy, we will be exiting another large but marginally profitable billboard contract this one in Los Angeles. We expect this exit on its own will pose a 200 basis point run rate impact to billboard revenue growth until we lap it next year. Given this contract was only marginally profitable, we expect a very limited impact on adjusted OIBDA and AFFO. Now turning to Transit on slide 11. In total, transit expenses were up almost $1,000,000 or 1% year over year. Transit franchise expense was flat as the annual inflation adjustment to the MTA contract was offset by lower variable payments to other franchises. Hosting maintenance and other expenses were up $05,000,000 or about 3% due primarily to higher maintenance and utilities costs. SG and A expenses were up 2.4% primarily due to higher allowance for bad debt. The 1% increase in total transit expenses, combined with the nearly 3% transit revenue growth this described earlier, with the transit adjusted OIBDA improving by about $1,000,000 during the quarter.

Since we still expect full year revenue to result in us paying the MAG in New York, York, we've straight lined our minimum guarantee payments throughout the year. And given the seasonal nature of our revenue, this leads to the unevenness of our transit OIBDA. We continue to expect that full year transit OIBDA will be positive. Slide 12 shows the company's combined billboard, transit and corporate adjusted OIBDA in the first quarter. We consider this an important measure given these represent essentially the entire company. Corporate expense rose by about $5,000,000 nearly entirely due to management severance payments and executive search fees. Combined with the billboard in transit OIBDA, I covered earlier, consolidated adjusted OIBDA totaled about $64,000,000 a 3% decline versus the prior year. Excluding the $5,000,000 of severance costs in Executive Search fees I just noted, adjusted OIBDA would have been up a few million dollars. Along with recent management changes, we are looking for additional ways to be more cost efficient as an organization. Turning to capital expenditures on slide 13. Q1 CapEx spend was $17,000,000 including about $6,000,000 of maintenance spend. For 2025, we still expect to spend approximately $85,000,000 of CapEx and also still expect $35,000,000 of this total for maintenance.

Looking at AFFO on slide 14, you can see the bridge to our Q1 AFFO of $24,000,000 The improvement is principally driven by higher billboard and transit OIBDA, and lower interest expense caused by lower debt balance following the sale of our Canadian business. These benefits were partially offset by a higher corporate expense much of which was due to unusual items such as severance. For the full year, while the economic environment remains uncertain, we are not seeing any we're not seeing cancellations or other indications that a recession is likely and continue to expect reported 2025 consolidated AFFO will grow in the mid single digit range. Please turn to Slide 15, for an update on our balance sheet. Committed liquidity is over $600,000,000 including about $30,000,000 of cash around $500,000,000 available by our revolver, and $100,000,000 available by our December '31, our total net leverage was 4.8 times within our four to five times target range. Our next maturity is a $400,000,000 term loan in late twenty twenty six. And we intend to refinance that later this year. Turning to our dividend. We announced today that our Board of Directors maintained a $0.30 cash dividend payable on June 30, to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 6, We spent approximately $6,000,000 on acquisitions during the quarter and looking at our current acquisition pipeline, we continue to expect our 2025 deal activity to be focused on opportunistic tuck ins and remain at a similar level to those seen in the last couple of years.

With that, let me turn the call back over to Nick.

Thank you, Matt. While significant uncertainty has been injected into the market because of the flux fluctuating economic policy announcements. And where we sit today we expect that second quarter revenues will look similar to the first quarter, perhaps a bit better billboard flattish to slightly down and transit up low to mid single digits. Notably, our quarter two guidance includes the revenue headwinds created by the exits of a two large billboard contracts. But as Matt just noted, these exits will have little to no impact on OIBDA or AFFO. Encouragingly, the top line in the second half is currently pacing better than the first.

To close, I'd like to share some of the comments I recently made at the OAAA Conference earlier this week in Boston. Today's marketing industry prioritizes digital media for measurable performance outcomes. This demands that we accelerate our digital first strategy to enable first party data integrations leverage our partnerships with the leading ad tech platforms to deliver dynamic content to target custom audience segments in the most efficient way possible. This campaign activation strategy will ensure that we deliver the most effective digital out of home campaigns with a proven ROI advertisers are demanding. This, in turn, will allow the entire out of home industry to fortify its position in an increasingly digital advertising future. With that, operator, let's now open up the lines for questions.

Sure. We will now begin the question and answer session. When preparing to ask you a question, please ensure your devices are muted locally. We will make a quick pause here for the questions to be registered. And our first question comes from the line of Daniel Oudley with Wells Fargo.

Thanks.

Given the broader concerns on the macro, you give us a general sense of what percentage of your ad categories are goods versus services? And then also in the current environment, would you expect local or national advertisers to be more resilient? Think this is second quarter in a row where local has underperformed. Thank you.

I think when thank you, Daniel. The question is one that we've been asking our sales organization on a very frequent basis that we're looking at it nationally, regionally and locally. And when it comes to the tariff and the implications of what that is representing, either in cuts or postponement, We've actually seen it really in the range of postponements, and we've seen that with automotive, some government and political a reap amount of fashion and retail. And tourism of CPG. They have not had any significant reductions, and we're mostly services. So I hope that gives you a sense of our book.

That's helpful. And the next question comes from Cameron McVeigh with Morgan Stanley.

I noticed a picture of your billboards in LA on the first slide of the deck. And curious, any more color on how spend in L. A, and in particular, media and entertainment related spend is trending I was curious if the exit of the LA contract is related to the fire. Thanks.

I think, Cameron, thank you for the Clearly, entertainment, the media and entertainment category is extremely important for us in LA. And Matt outlined on our last call, we're going to ensure that we're as creative and innovative as we can about representing the broadest range of our inventory, whether it be transit, static, or digital, to ensure we satisfy the the best opportunities. What we are not going to continue doing is to ensure that because of one individual category, we're going to be focused on leases and lease arrangements and contracts that we don't consider to be profitable over the longer term. What we've also not seen is that this is an individual category, it's fire related.

We've had a lot I was just asking the LA team this. We've had a lot on the genre, that have actually been more horror related. For the last quarter, we've seen a very exciting quarter two of the slate that's looking very promising. So again, as an industry sector, it remains extremely important for us and one that we're going to service with the level of productivity as they have come to expect.

Great. Thank you. And then just secondly, curious the latest on the MTA contracts, where the MAX stands and if you've seen any impact from the New York City congestion pricing on transit growth? So far?

Thanks.

Thanks, Kim. It's Matt. On the MTA contract, MEG went up this year from $150,000,000 last year to 106 which represented a little over 3% New York CPI increase It's hard to kind of trace or see the benefit of congestion pricing or return to office or just New York City economic activity but it's only the congestion pricing and seems accretive We're focusing more performance wise on the MCAs, so our teams are doing great. But, you know, I'm on the subway almost every day You know, it seems a little more crowded to me. And our our metrics that we look at and get from the MTA seem to open [indiscernible] ridership and return to work.

And then, you know, I I hope, you know, all the banks and everyone else out there is now pushing people for five days week. [indiscernible] We will now follow to the next question that comes from Patrick Shaw with Barrington Research. Hi. Thank you. Just curious on the first two imperatives that you you laid out for Tom's for for Outfront's focus, I was just wondering if you could, maybe talk about you know, any like, maybe if could drill down into how we should know, think about, you know, potential cost savings or operational efficiencies that you would you would look for in there?

Thanks, Patrick.

For the question. I lined up against the vision of these four strategic imperatives that have begun in earnest. You're talking specifically about the first two in terms of resetting sales strategies and ways of working and And to be clear, that's not about the efficiency, that's really about the demand engine. And being very focused on our organizational structure on operating system, to both drive revenues from existing clients whilst really pursuing the non out of home advertisers that are significant in many industry categories today. The second strategic imperative is allowing us to review all of the costs that have been invested in the AI and the automation and the current existing tech stack because we've said that we want to modernize our tech stack whether it's to do with our order management system or our data integrations. And we're going to continue to be as smart on our investments for ad tech stack. And critically, that's about the programmatic platforms, between the SSPs and DSPs as well as identifying those platform resellers that are becoming very very active, very significant in digital out of home marketplace. So where we're focusing and we're having the conversation and Matt mentioned earlier, is about looking and showing we're focused on cost efficiencies throughout the business.

These four strategic imperatives are about focus a laser like focus on what we believe to be the most important things that are going to drive the growth of the business and taking our attention or involvement away from the things that aren't. I hope that answers your question.

Yes.

Yes. And then on the, q two expectations, you know, aside from the exited contracts, are you seeing any differences across geographies and and on the revenue trends?

Good, Pat. The West has been a bit of a challenge for us, not just LA, but obviously, Francisco is still recovering You know? So if anything, you as Nick pointed out in his remarks, know, South and the Midwest are generally doing pretty well. In the East Region, pointed out the MTA, MTA performance is doing very well, and that really carries the water for all of our transit segments. But nothing that drove conclusions about Regions, just where we have our portfolios. Some seem to do a little better these days. Some are doing a little little less better. Thank you. [indiscernible] since we don't have any further questions in the queue, I will hand back over to Nick Ryan for any closing remarks. Well, thank you for joining us today. Certainly, we hope to see and meet many of you at the various conferences. And events as we head into the summer. But for those who we don't, we certainly look forward to presenting our quarter two results to you in early August. Thank you for your you for your time today.

Thank you, everyone, for joining today's call. This concludes the call. You may now disconnect. Have a great rest of your day.