Financial information provided by Financial Modeling Prep. Options data provided by Unusual Whales. Live transcripts provided by Quartr. Reported revenue and EPS data from Earnings powered by FinChat.io. All data is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes or financial, investment, tax, legal, accounting or other advice.
I'm in incredibly excited to lead Prudential forward at this pivotal moment in our one hundred and fifty year history. We make promises that last for decades. And we commit every single day to keep those promises to our 50,000,000 customers all over the world. Our work makes a difference. And that is a privilege that I take seriously. Over the past few months, I've been visiting our global offices and meeting with our leadership as they take stock of the state of our business. What is clear to me from this early assessment as CEO is that we need to sharpen our focus on driving growth and on creating greater value for our stakeholders. Beginning on slide two, I see both significant opportunities and challenges in front of us. With our unique combination of global scale, distribution power, brand and talent, we're well positioned to address the growing protection and retirement needs of customers and clients around the world. And to meet increasing investor appetite for a broad range of investment products. Including private credit and alternatives. Over the last several years, we've made tangible progress towards de risking and diversifying the company.
12m 59s
Through our divestitures and blocks placed into runoff, we've significantly reduced our exposure to more volatile and market sensitive products. We've already reduced our overall exposure to traditional variable annuities, and guaranteed universal life products by nearly 60% And we continue to focus on ways to optimize our balance sheet, capital and cash flows. Our life and annuity products in The U. S. Are more diverse than ever. While in Japan, we've increased sales of savings and retirement products by more than 50% over the past three years. Complementing our core life insurance offering in that market. We're beginning to see the benefits of this more diversified product mix. Specifically stronger sales and flows across our retirement and insurance businesses, while PGIM continues to benefit from a broader range of traditional and alternative investment products. Expanding distribution platform and strong investment performance. In the first quarter, we reported strong sales across our global retirement and insurance businesses. As well as strong investment performance and robust flows at PGIM. And while our earnings were higher than in the first quarter of last year, I want to be clear, Our recent results do not meet our expectations. And we will do better.
14m 18s
Underlying capabilities distribution strength brand and product quality of Prudential should deliver more value to our stakeholders. We will deliver to a higher performance standard going forward. That is what our customers, our employees and our shareholders expect. My leadership team and I are committed to executing on a strategy to fundamentally improve our financial performance. At the same time, the path to higher earnings growth will not be linear. There are two reasons for this. First, we expect lower earnings growth in our U. S. Businesses over the near term as we continue to run off more volatile blocks of our business comprised of traditional variable annuities and guaranteed universal life products. Second, we face near term earnings pressure in our Japan business.
15m 8s
Driven by elevated surrenders of U. S. Dollar denominated products due to a weaker yen. Although we're seeing signs that this is beginning to stabilize. Importantly, we believe these earnings headwinds that contribute to an estimated three to four point drag to EPS growth in 2025 will dissipate over time. We will see the compounding impact of our strong sales and flows drive stronger growth long term. We remain confident in achieving the intermediate term financial targets we provided to you last quarter. While we do not plan to provide quarterly updates to these targets, I want to assure you that as the new CEO, and despite the current macro uncertainty, we continue to expect 5% to 8% core adjusted operating EPS growth on average through 2027. Which is inclusive of the transitory headwinds. We have real work ahead of us to create greater value for our stakeholders. But let me reiterate, we are committed to delivering stronger results over time. Turning to slide three, I want to share with you today how I see us getting there. First, will evolve and deliver on our strategy. Our world is evolving. We will adapt to meet the opportunity and prioritize the allocation of our capital accordingly.
16m 31s
The areas that present the greatest opportunities for profitable growth will get more capital, those that do not will get less. Second, we will execute with consistency. We must raise the bar as we execute. Specifically, that means continuing to evolve to a more favorable product and business mix improving our track record of delivering the returns of our inorganic and organic capital deployment, and continuing to improve our expense profile across our operations. Finally, we will focus on our culture. We benefit from strong talent, expertise and diversity of perspectives. But we must move faster to ensure we capture new opportunities as they emerge. And take greater accountability for outcomes. We've already taken action to align incentives even more closely to earnings per share growth. These are my priorities evolving and delivering on our strategy, improving on our execution and fostering a high performance culture. Coupled with our differentiated position serving 50,000,000 customers and clients, with a diverse range of financial solutions, have every confidence that we can and we will evolve our business and drive sustainable profitable growth in the years ahead. Moving to slide four and before turning it over to Janella to provide greater detail on our results.
17m 59s
Let me briefly reflect on how we're positioned in the current macroeconomic and market environment. Prudential has a long history of navigating economic cycles and global events and we are well positioned to support our customers and capitalize on new opportunities as they emerge. Our diversified business mix provides stability, across a variety of macroeconomic scenarios. Our balance sheet includes nearly $5,000,000,000 in highly liquid assets, strong statutory solvency ratios, and access to significant off balance sheet resources that support our AA financial strength.
18m 37s
In addition, we have a high quality, well diversified investment portfolio and disciplined approach to asset liability and risk management which is designed for times like these. To perform through periods of stress, uncertainty and volatility. And with that, I'll turn it over to Janella.
18m 56s
Thank you, Andy.
18m 58s
I will provide an overview of our financial results and business performance for our PGIM U. S. And international businesses. I will begin on Slide five our financial results. Our pretax adjusted operating income was $1,500,000,000 or $3.29 per share for the first quarter of twenty twenty five. Up 8% from the prior year quarter. This reflects favorable variances on underwriting results across our U. S. Businesses, including the benefits of our recent de risking transactions lower expenses. The current quarter also included alternative investment income that was below our expectations by $90,000,000 driven by lower private equity and real estate returns. Turning to the quarterly operating results, from our businesses compared to the year ago quarter. PGIM had lower other related revenues driven by lower seed and co investment income and incentive fees. Which was partially offset by higher asset management fees net of related expenses. Results of our U. S. Businesses reflected more favorable underwriting results and lower expenses partially offset by lower fee income from the runoff of our legacy traditional variable annuity block. And lower spread income driven by lower alternative investment returns that more than offset the benefit from business growth. Our international businesses have lower spread income including lower alternative investment returns.
20m 39s
Lower joint venture earnings driven by less favorable encaje performance in Chile, and the net unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates. Turning to slide six, PGIM has diversified capabilities in both public and private classes across fixed income equities and alternatives. Stigion's investment performance remains strong with 8179% of assets under management outperforming their benchmarks over the last five and ten year periods respectively. CGM's assets under management increased by 3% to $1,400,000,000,000 from the prior year quarter driven by market appreciation net flows and strong investment performance. The net flows in the quarter of $4,300,000,000 included institutional third party flows of $4,600,000,000 driven by mandates across fixed income, private alternatives and equity which were partially offset by modest retail third party outflows. Our diversified PGIM private alternatives platform which has assets under management of nearly $250,000,000,000 experienced over $10,000,000,000 in private capital deployment, up over 60% compared to the prior year quarter. Although deployment was higher across both private credit and real estate, activity slowed towards the end of the quarter, due to heightened market uncertainty, has continued into the second quarter. Turning to slide seven, Our U. S. Businesses produce diversified sources of earnings from fees, net investment spread and underwriting income and benefit from our complementary mix of longevity and mortality businesses.
22m 36s
Retirement strategies continue to have strong sales momentum generating over $10,000,000,000 in the first quarter across its institutional and individual lines of business. Institutional Retirement sales of $7,000,000,000 included two international longevity reinsurance transactions totaling nearly $5,000,000,000 We also experienced our best quarter ever in structured settlements with $600,000,000 in sales. Individual Retirement posted $3,500,000,000 in sales in the first quarter, up 5% from the year ago quarter. Our registered index linked annuities continue to demonstrate the benefits of our product pivots and innovation. While we sustain momentum in our fixed annuity product sales. Additionally, we continue to reduce market sensitivity by running off our legacy variable annuities. Group insurance sales totaled $400,000,000 in the first quarter, up 6% from the prior year quarter, driven primarily by strength in our group life products. We are executing our strategy of both product and market segment diversification while leveraging technology to increase operating efficiency and enhance the customer experience. The benefits ratio of 81.3% in the first quarter reflects favorable underwriting results in the quarter as well as our strategic actions to improve profitability and performance. In Individualized, sales totaled over $200,000,000 in the first quarter, up 26% from the prior year quarter.
24m 20s
This growth was driven largely by accumulation focused variable products, reflective of our pivot to be more capital efficient. Turning to slide eight. Our international businesses include our Japanese life insurance companies, where we have a differentiated multichannel distribution model. As well as other businesses aimed at expanding our presence in targeted high growth emerging markets. Sales in our international businesses were up 15% compared to the prior year quarter. Sales in Japan are benefiting from our recent retirement and savings product launches which are gaining traction with customers, resulting in an increase of over 20% in sales of these products compared to the prior year quarter. In addition, emerging market sales increased 19% versus the prior year quarter driven by record sales in Brazil as we continue to benefit from the strong performance of our Life Planners and Group Life sales. Turning to slide nine, Our significant capital position and strong regulatory capital ratio ratios continue to support our AA financial strength and our ability to expand our market leading businesses. Our cash and liquid assets were $4,900,000,000 which is above our minimum liquidity target of $3,000,000,000 and we have substantial off balance sheet resources. As we look ahead, we are well positioned across our businesses to be a global leader in expanding access to investing, insurance and retirement security.
26m 1s
As Andy mentioned, there are near term headwinds impacting the earnings across several of our businesses, and we're operating in volatile economic conditions, but we have confidence the intermediate term targets outlined last quarter. And with that, we will be happy to take your questions.
26m 20s
Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. In the interest of time, we ask you please ask one question, one follow-up then return to the queue. Our first question today is coming from Ryan Krueger from KBW. Your line is now live.
26m 53s
Hey, thanks. Good morning. I had a question for Andy. You touched on this a little bit in your prepared remarks, but I noticed also there was a Bloomberg article last night where I think you you mentioned that the changing competitive and economic landscape may call for a review of of your capital deployment plans at some point. Was hoping you could expand on you mean by that and if that was more about where you're organically allocating capital to grow or if that refers more to things could involve M and A or divestitures?
27m 27s
So good morning, Ryan, and thanks first of all for reading the article. My job as the CEO is to ensure that we deploy capital to the highest and the best uses across the entire enterprise. So we continuously evaluate the various opportunities in front of us and that obviously includes all various uses organic, inorganic and their return profile. As we do that, we're working to optimize our balance sheet, our cash flows and our capital. But my statement really is markets change, businesses change, and we're going to need to evolve with that as things evolve. As we sit here, we like our capital deployment plans. Which obviously reflect the current opportunities that we see in the marketplace. But it would certainly be reasonable to expect that uses of capital could evolve over time. So I think the important thing is this is a continuous discipline that we have.
28m 22s
Okay, thanks. Makes sense. And then on PGIM, you had provided a 25% to 30% adjusted margin target over the three year period last quarter. Is that something that you think you can get into the range this year or will it potentially take some time through this three year period?
28m 40s
So as we framed last call, this is an intermediate term target. So we're not going to get into the habit of giving quarterly updates. Let me just make some comments overall about our margins PGIM. Obviously, I was disappointed with our Q1 margins As you know, the first quarter is typically lowest margin quarter because of the long term incentive compensation expenses. But this quarter, the volatility affected our seed and co investments. So volatility creates headwinds here in the near term. Whether that's going to last for months or quarters is very hard to tell. It's been a pretty volatile environment. But long term our path is clear and I'm confident in it which is the path towards 30%. And I would mention the three things I've talked about before. First, we've been consistently investing in a whole variety of growth opportunities. We're coming out the other side of the J curve on those and we're seeing earnings produced from those. So that'll give us lift. Second, I think as you're well aware, both the real estate and fixed income markets have had low points here over the last couple of years. And we've been seeing those markets recover that will obviously also create a tailwind for us.
29m 55s
And then finally, we've made expense discipline part of our DNA across our businesses. We will continue to look for productivity and efficiency opportunities and that will help us expand our margin. So we are confident in the path towards 30% as we stated in our intermediate financial targets.
30m 14s
Thank you.
30m 17s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Tom Gallagher from Evercore ISI. Your line is now live.
30m 24s
Good morning. Andy, I appreciate your candor. And your opening remarks. Thanks for that.
30m 32s
I know you flagged the some of the headwinds and in terms of the VA and SUL runoff I guess one way to reduce the headwind is to meaningfully shrink the remaining exposure of the in force free up capital and then you don't have that as an earnings drag. Is that now I know you've already cut significantly cut the size of both of those risks Is that something now that's on the table a much more dramatic shrink of those, whether that's through a prismic transaction or third party, is something that's on the table that we should be thinking about? So Tom, first thank you for the feedback on my opening remarks. I appreciate that.
31m 19s
As you've said, we've made very good progress in de risking the company. And obviously, we've used the two levers. We see selling traditional variable annuities and guaranteeing universal life and put them in runoff. And we've done very successful transactions. So those were absolutely the right decisions. We're happy we did it. But let me just share with how I think about this. And we've talked about derisking almost like it's an event. It's not an event. De risking and really managing risk profile of the company is continuous. So I've intentionally chosen the words of continuously optimizing our balance sheet, capital, our cash flows because that is a discipline that we have consistently evaluating opportunities So I don't see it as something that starts and then we're done. At this point sitting here today what I would share is there's nothing in the pipeline that's worthy of talking about with you.
32m 16s
Got you. Thanks for that. And then for Janella, just a question on how you're feeling about capital levels in Japan ahead of the ESR implementation set for next year. Would you anticipate having to contribute capital or do you feel like you're good enough based on at least preliminary assessment you've done on on how that might impact capital? Thank you.
32m 46s
Good morning, Tom. Yes, with regards to ESR, I'll start with a couple of things. First, as we've said before, we expect capital levels will continue to be above levels that would support AA financial strength ratings. Post the implementation. Second, we do not expect dividend capacity to change as a result of ESR implementation. The statutory framework will remain unchanged, and we expect that to continue to be the binding constraint on cash dividends And I would add that we are confident in our ability to solve for uneconomic volatility in the ESR framework. We have historically used different tools including reinsurance to manage our capital and liquidity positions. And we expect to continue to leverage these tools And maybe lastly, I would say that we've had a number of years to plan for this. And we've focused on two things. One is the level of ESR capital and of course the volatility in the framework. And that has influenced our product strategy. We've launched more products that are ESR friendly, but also meet customer needs. And it has influenced our reinsurance strategy. And just maybe as a point of reference, as of the end of twenty twenty four, roughly 70% of our U. S. Dollar liabilities in Japan are reinsured outside of Japan.
34m 8s
Got you. That's helpful color. Thank you.
34m 13s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Bob Huang from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live. Good morning. Maybe just a follow-up on the questions on Japan and ESR. As you think about reinsurer like liabilities out of Japan, Can you maybe help us think about just the broader reinsurance market in there? Like is Prismic the most efficient way from a pricing perspective to reinsure business out of Japan or are there other reinsurance opportunities that you can evaluate Is there a way to think about that?
34m 49s
Yes. Good morning, Bob. So a couple of things. So let me start by saying that reinsurance is an important tool that we use to optimize capital. And to align regulatory reserves and capital requirements to the economics of our products. And we have multiple avenues for where and how we manage risk, so we use our wholly owned entities Prismic, and external reinsurance. So, we have multiple tools In terms of where we decide where to manage the risk, I mean, the decision regarding where to manage it really will be made in the context of our strategy and also in the context of evaluating the implications of all the things that we think about and care about PFI, capital levels, statutory [indiscernible] economic and liquidity lenses. So, really put it through that entire paradigm and that is how we make the decision as to where to manage the risk The great thing is that we have multiple tools.
35m 48s
Got it. Thanks. And apologies if I missed but you did not provide a preliminary ESR ratio at all, right?
35m 54s
No. We continue to plan on providing that this summer, which is about a year in advance of the required disclosure.
36m 3s
Got it. Okay. No, I really appreciate that. Maybe my follow-up is on the variable investment income. Just given how volatile the market was so far, is it possible maybe to kind of provide some color in terms of how we should think about the VII into the second quarter or maybe rest of the year from a modeling perspective?
36m 23s
Yes. So definitely, as you mentioned in the first quarter, we did see lower alternative investment income that was driven by lower than expected private equity returns and lower real estate returns. With regards to the outlook, I would say that predicting near term performance in the current environment is challenging due to the heightened uncertainty and volatility. However, it is likely that the decline that we have experienced so far this quarter in equity markets will result in returns below expected levels at the beginning of the year. And let me share sensitivity with you. So if we experience equity market decline of 10% followed by a 1.25% quarterly recovery returns on our alternatives would still be positive but we could see anywhere between a 200 to two fifty basis point decline, to our intermediate term expectations of 7% to 9% over a four quarter period. I would note that this is a more conservative scenario than we have historically observed over the last twenty five years back to February. And I'd also be very clear that we are comfortable with our alternatives portfolio and the long term target returns. And this has proven out over time. On a cumulative basis, these investments have exceeded expectations over the past decade.
37m 44s
Excellent. Thank you very much.
37m 49s
Thank you. Next question today is coming from Suneet Kamath from Jefferies. Your line is now live.
37m 54s
Great, thanks. And Andy, also appreciate that comments that you made about improving the financial performance of the company. That was good to hear. I wanted to to follow-up on Tom's questioning, but specifically with a focus on the life insurance business. And what I'd like to try to understand is the strategic value of individual life And the reason I asked the question is, we did see earlier in the year another company effectively exit Individual Life, got a pretty good deal with it. It's about 5% of your earnings. So it's not a huge needle mover. And just based on my experience, it seems like this business maybe more often hurts Prue than helps it.
38m 32s
There must be some rationale in terms of why you've decided to keep the business I'd like to understand that a little bit more. Thanks. Yes, Suneet, it's Andy. So first thank you for your very candid question. Let me talk about our life insurance business And really when we talk about this, there's two aspects that you should think about when we think about our Life business. The first aspect is obviously the legacy guaranteed universal life business that's that's in runoff. But then the second is the go forward product set. And we obviously feel differently about the two pieces. We've been working very diligently to reduce our exposure the guaranteed universal life side putting it a runoff doing the transactions. And obviously you've seen the outcomes that we've been able to produce there. What we've done is made sure we've learned from that experience and are applying these learnings. But your question about the go forward business, we like this business. Obviously, it's a business that's core to Prudential's purpose. From a long run perspective. But there are other reasons I would hit. The product portfolio that we're in the market with today is less interest rate sensitive and more capital efficient than the prior product set and we're seeing good profitability with that.
39m 53s
Obviously, this is a business that also adds to our mortality longevity balance, which is important for the company given that we're always managing business mix as part of as part of our accountability. And when you look to to be in a business or not in a business, you need to look at your strengths and your capabilities This is a business where we have deep capabilities in our underwriting shop. We're one of the most brands out there with great customer experience. We're seeing a flight to quality. So when well managed, which is what every intention we have to do, this is a good business and it's an important part of the overall mix. And I think that flight to quality you saw this this quarter with the great sales that we had.
40m 41s
Okay. I appreciate that. Thanks.
40m 43s
And then I guess on the Japan surrenders, it sounds like in your prepared remarks you had mentioned that maybe the pressure is abating a little bit I was wondering if you could provide a little bit more information there. How much more of this is sort of in front of Peru? And when these surrenders happen, is there some sort of a surrender fee or reserve release that helps earnings in the short term? Or is it just kind of a negative, when these things happen? Thanks.
41m 11s
Yes. Hi, Suneet. So as Andy noted in his opening remarks, while surrender activity remains a near term headwind, we are seeing signs that this trend is beginning to stabilize. We've seen improvement in the pace of surrenders through 2024 and continuing through 2025. And we would expect that the trend would continue given current exchange rates. But in terms of when it's behind us, it's difficult to predict given that it is tied to the exchange rate. Again, but that said, the impact of the surrenders has dissipated. I would say that it remains a headwind to this year. And just to give you some quantification, we estimate that the impact to 2025 earnings from the surrenders that we experienced in 2024 will be roughly $100,000,000 To your question about are there offsetting surrender fees, the majority of these these contracts are beyond the surrender charge period. Therefore, is no offsetting impact of a surrender charge fee.
42m 16s
Sunita, I would just add into that that we've been very proactive in Japan from a business perspective taking action to mitigate the effects here. So you've heard us talk about broadening and diversifying our product portfolio. The fact of the 20% of our sales came from products launched in the last twenty four months is evidence of that. We've doubled our yen offerings in the marketplace. 30% of this quarter sales were yen based. And we've added staff both in distribution organization and in the customer service so that we can work with customers who still have needs for protection to not just drop their coverage but to find other alternatives. So we're being very proactive in working to mitigate this.
43m 2s
Got it. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Next question today is coming from Joel Hurwitz from Dowling and Partners. Your line is now live.
43m 13s
Hey, good morning. So I wanted to touch on the earnings emergence in the retirement business. Businesses. We saw individual retirement with a nice pickup this quarter, but institutional retirement earnings have contracted a bit despite the really strong PRT activity last year.
43m 28s
Just any color what's going on in institutional and when you expect sort of the earnings to pick up?
43m 35s
Hi, Joel. So yes, this is a topic I know we talked about throughout last year, right, in terms of the fact that we had very strong sales, especially on PRT in 2024 and the fact that the emergence of those earnings happens over several quarters as the timing of the sales is not obviously as of oneone. And also we rotate into the portfolio. And the best way think about this is to look at first quarter twenty twenty five and compare that to first quarter twenty twenty four. Now the core earnings in Institutional Retirement in those periods was down by $24,000,000 but that does reflect the benefit of the sales. So let's walk through that. We did have growth in spread earnings from our strong sales, again, particularly the strong PRT sales that we had in 2024. And the benefit to spread net of the expected runoff of the in force PRT is a runoff business was approximately $25,000,000 So that is the benefit of the sales. But that was more than offset by other factors. Primarily, we had the change in the internal expense allocation that we previously announced. There was a shift of $50,000,000 of annual expenses to institutional retirement that nets to zero across the company but it does impact the business.
44m 57s
Second, we had lower spread income on cash balances in the business and that was due to the reduction in short term rates of about 100 basis points in the second half of twenty twenty four. As you've heard us say, short term rates don't have a total material impact to the enterprise. But they did impact the business due to cash balances. And lastly, we had a refinement of accounting methodology for certain derivatives. Which resulted in a reclassification out of operating income to non operating earnings for retirement. No impact to net, but it did impact the core earnings power. So those are the three drivers that offset the fact that we're seeing our earnings in spread. We feel good about the growth that we're seeing in spread. It's just being masked by these items.
45m 45s
Okay. That was really helpful. Thank you.
45m 47s
Maybe just sticking on PRT, can you just talk about what you're seeing in the market? And are you seeing any sort of impact just given the legal case out there?
45m 58s
So thanks Joel for the question. The market size that we've seen all the way through the first quarter is, I would frame it as expected. So we have not seen an effect of the litigation on on the willingness and desire for transactions in the marketplace. Nor have we seen any impact obviously on our success in that market. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to see 2025 normalize from a market size perspective. 2024 was was a pretty robust year. The reason I feel that way is because of the volatility that's currently going on in the environment. Volatility impacts decision makers in that most business decision makers slow up on their decision making sometimes they pull up on their decision making. So that probably will mean a normalization in the near term. But look, think the important thing is long term this is a very good growth area. There's $3,000,000,000,000 in pension plan assets that haven't transacted, funded status is at 100%. At the end of the day, volatility creates a higher desire for plan sponsors to want to transact So we see this as a good long term growth area. Maybe the last thing I'd say is just remember this is a more transaction oriented business not a flow oriented business.
47m 21s
So transactions will be episodic and you shouldn't expect to see things every quarter. Okay. Thanks for the answers. You're welcome.
47m 33s
Thank you. Next question today is coming from John Barnidge from Piper Sandler. Your line is now live.
47m 40s
Good morning. Thank you for the opportunity. My first question is about comment about sharpening the focus in growth.
47m 48s
Does inorganic sit within that?
47m 51s
John, thanks for the question. So even though you asked the question that way, I will start with organic growth is job one and we're going to stay very focused on that. That is always our highest priority and best thing to do. That said, inorganic growth is an important and necessary tool for us to continue to maintain our market leadership and expand our market leadership. So you've seen us do this where like in direct lending as an example, we organically built a business that was very successful. We then complemented that business by the purchase of DeerPath Capital. Which was very complementary but required to continue to build on and maintain market leadership. What I will share as I always share is we're going to be very have a high bar for inorganic capital deployment And you should think of we're leaning into higher growth and capital efficient areas as we stated in the past. So no change from that perspective.
48m 57s
Thank you for that. And maybe my follow-up question on the organic. A number of life insurers that have sizable asset management operations have started to introduce investment options combining public and private in the same, Where do you sit with the opportunity for interval funds for PGIM? Thank you.
49m 18s
So, thank you for the question. So, we actually have been bringing our public and private capabilities together with PGIM and have actually been introducing early days interval funds. As you know, we've been leaning into areas that we think are going to be higher growth and higher fee. And have been expanding those capabilities both institutionally and on the retail side. So we definitely think that is an area of opportunity that we've invested in. As with any of these capabilities, I'd go back to kind of my J curve comment earlier. It obviously takes a bit of time for the assets to flow in and for the results to show up on the bottom line.
50m 8s
Thank you.
50m 13s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Elyse Greenspan from Wells Fargo. Your line is now live. Hi, thanks.
50m 20s
Sorry, good morning. My first question, I guess, I want to go back sorry, to the EPS guide, right? So you guys were talking about 3% to 4% drag this year. When you think about the 5% to 8% right over the three year period, should we think about that some of that coming back in 2026 of the 3% to 4% and then more in twenty twenty seven percent. The earnings growth picks up steam as we go through the three years. And kind of get that that average growth over the three year period? Morning, Alicia. Let take that. So going back to when we shared the targets last quarter, we said the 5% to 8% is a three year view intermediate, and the growth will not be linear. And as you heard in Andy's opening remarks, we face near term headwinds. A couple of thoughts. We are seeing the benefit of our strong sales in earnings coming through. However, in the near term, they are being offset by headwinds that we talked about. So the surrenders in Japan due to the weakening yen which I just quantified and the impact of the run runoff variable annuity. So, I quantified the impact of the weakening yen.
51m 34s
I thought it'd be helpful to also quantify our expectations on the of the runoff of the variable annuity. So as we have previously shared, the quarterly runoff is anywhere between 3,000,000,000 to $4,000,000,000 Earnings impact will fluctuate with markets. From quarter to quarter, but we estimate that the annual earnings impact on a cumulative basis is anywhere between 100,000,000 to $150,000,000 So those are the 2025 impacts to earnings. But we do expect these headwinds to dissipate over time. They're embedded in the intermediate term targets of 5% to 8%. We expect them to dissipate over time as the surrenders stabilize and as the runoff slows down. And of course, as our growth continues to emerge and we continue to demonstrate further growth. Thanks. Then my second question, you guys last quarter, right, we're talking about capital return as a percent of net income, but obviously that could swing around quarter to quarter. And you guys were above 100% last year. And again in the Q1. So are you still kind of gearing folks to think about capital return as a percent of net income as opposed to operating? How should we we think about that for this year?
52m 52s
Yes. Elyse, when I think about the targets that we spoke about, we have the 65% of net income as a free cash flow target. That isn't directly linked to capital return. But obviously, it is the capital that is available to be returned And as you noted, it does fluctuate. So when we think about the free cash flow target, ratio, it is an overtime measure. Not a quarterly view, because cash flows to and from the businesses to the HoldCo can be can be lumpy and are not linear. That said, we did have strong cash flows from the businesses this quarter. We had $600,000,000 come up to PFI. In addition to other sources and uses. And again, I would just highlight that that ratio is an over time measure and will not be linear.
53m 42s
Okay.
53m 43s
Thank you.
53m 46s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Jimmy Bhullar from JPMorgan. Your line is now live.
53m 52s
Hey, I guess it's good morning still. First, I just had a question for Janella following up on your the ESR discussion. You didn't obviously give a number, but on what the ESR is? But what do you think is the normal threshold that you'd want to run your business given your liability profile in Japan?
54m 12s
Yes. So let me what we would say is, most share the preliminary ESR views during the summer. We will continue to manage these entities to a level of capital consistent with our AA targets. And we do that post ESR implementation, we will be at those levels.
54m 31s
Okay. But you're not open to discussing what the level is?
54m 33s
Or what the base is not asking what your level is, but what do you think is the appropriate base?
54m 40s
Yes. No, again, we will share where we are and what we think the appropriate level is in the summer.
54m 46s
Okay. And then on your flows in PGIM were obviously very strong this quarter. And then annuity flows also benefited from decent growth in the buffer product. How should we assume that both of those businesses are going to hold up in the face of higher market volatility. I'm assuming PJM obviously is going see some pressure, but should the annuity business benefit or is it going to be pressured as well given higher volatility in a directionally declining market overall?
55m 20s
So Jimmy, let me take those one at a time. I'll start with PGIM and then I'll talk about annuities. So on PGIM, we were quite pleased with our flows in the first quarter as you mentioned. We had very strong institutional flows that it was very broad based We saw that across many clients, which we are happy to see and also across almost all of our asset classes. So, was very broad based inflows. We did see obviously volatility really kick up in March and uncertainty in the market causes clients to go risk off The most immediate effect of that is retail clients react first and we definitely saw that in March and are seeing that continue into April. If volatility continues, I would expect to see it have an impact on institutional flows as well. So I would frame this as we are off to a great start 2025 thanks to all of our hard work and good results but we're now more cautious. On PGIM flows please also though keep in mind the affiliated flows, which were in essence flat this quarter. But over time, thanks to our retirement and insurance capabilities that will be a good growth opportunity.
56m 37s
On the annuity side, market is robust. We saw the third record of basically quarter at $100,000,000,000 in sales. Obviously, interest rates go up and down, you could have dampening or enhancing effects. But the important thing is there are significant long term tailwinds that are driving this business. You think of the aging of the population, the real need to search for yield to search for higher yield. The fact is volatility creates a higher desire for protected solutions and certainty. So we expect this to remain a robust market. We are pleased with our $3,500,000,000 in sales We've now been very consistent at that. So believe that this will be a good growth area for us. Okay, thanks. And if I could just ask one more and Andy, can you talk about like some of the key areas where maybe we'll see a shift in strategy or focus on the part of Prudential? And I think you mentioned something along the lines of like uses of capital might evolve over time, but we're maybe be a little bit more specific on where it is that you'll be different going forward than maybe in the past few years?
57m 55s
Yes. So Jimmy, I'll just sort of reiterate what I talked about at the top of the call with Ryan. Which is we are going to continuously be evaluating the various growth opportunities that we have in front of us and their return profile as we look to optimize things As I sit here today, I'm not ready to go deeper. We obviously have a continuous process of assessing the market changes and business business changes and how we need to evolve our capital plans. But I think the important takeaway is it's a continuous discipline that we have and will evolve and adjust over time.
58m 34s
Okay. Thanks.
58m 38s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Jack Matson from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now live. Hey, good morning. Just a follow-up on the individual retirement sales outlook. I mean, any insights on how sales levels are trending so far in April, especially for the the pilot product given some of the recent market volatility? I think you read referenced it's a good environment for sales, but do you think that the $3,500,000,000 this quarter is something that you can sustain throughout the balance of the year?
59m 7s
Jack, it's Andy. I'm not going to get that specific about what we're seeing in the month of April. And candidly we look at this business over the long term and what the long term tailwind trends are going to be for us. And obviously, we feel very good and very strong about that.
59m 25s
Got it. All good. Thank you. And maybe just one on the group business, I think premium growth in the quarter was pretty strong, kind of well above like the intermediate term target you've laid out. Just any color on what drove that result in how you view the outlook for growth in that business this year?
59m 44s
Hey, Jack, it's Janella. So yes, we had strong performance across the board in group, both in Group Life and Disability. The core earnings in the quarter really highlight our continued momentum and we're executing on our growth strategy and also ensuring that we are maintaining price discipline here. We're making investments in improving our customer experience and claims management capabilities. So a very good story. And you could see our focus on profitable growth highlighted really in the overall benefit ratio, which was just over 81% this quarter in right below the target of 83% to 87%. And of course, our segment diversification strategy is also showing up and improving our fundamentals in the business, most notably under the 5,000 lives market where we had over 50% sales growth compared to a year ago quarter. So all this is showing up in the results, we feel good about the outlook for the business.
1h 42s
Thank you. Thank you. Next question today is coming from Wes Carmichael from Autonomous Research. Your line is now live.
1h 52s
Hey, good morning. I wanted to come back to the EPS discussion real quick. But Andy, you reiterated 5% to 8%. Average core EPS growth over the three year period.
1h 1m 1s
Could you just help us with the baseline with which to measure YouTube? Because I know there was some change to reported seasonality. But if I look at last quarter's slide deck, the 2024 core EPS was $13.94 So is that the baseline? Or should we be looking at a different figure?
1h 1m 17s
Yes, Wes, it's Janella. So if you recall last quarter when we had in the presentation the core base that you should be working off of is $13.67 and that's adjusted for all the seasonality and reflecting all those changes.
1h 1m 34s
Okay. No, that's helpful. Thanks, Shanae. And maybe just a question on Prismic. I know you announced a $7,000,000,000 in January, but to see if you could provide a little more color on maybe just strategically if anything's changed, with Prismic, if you're focused on more back book deals or if you're looking towards third party business now?
1h 1m 52s
Yes. So I don't think anything has strategically changed. I mentioned in my answer to the prior question that we really have multiple levers that we look at and multiple avenues for where and how we manage risk. Wholly owned entities, prismic and external reinsurance, and we really leverage all of those. We have an active pipeline for PRISMIC, and really, that focuses on financing new business growth ongoing balance sheet optimization. You heard Andy say that is a We're constantly looking at how do we optimize the balance sheet. And lastly, third party blocks. However, these transactions are complex. They're bespoke to each situation and require regulatory so they do take time. And again, as you said, we just closed the Japan transaction, dollars 7,000,000,000. Thank you.
1h 2m 46s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Alex Scott from Barclays. Your line is now live. [indiscernible] First one I had is on the yen hedging program. Just in light of some of the volatility that's been in currency markets. Could you talk about that program and if you're able to talk at all about how that impacts potential ESR ratio. I know we don't don't know what it is. We don't know what the baseline is, but one of your peers had some volatility in their ESR related to this and just just given you guys have a big program as well. I'd just be interested in how that if it all affects the capitalization [indiscernible] Japan business? Thanks.
1h 3m 31s
Yes. So a couple of thoughts there. So we don't hedge our yen earnings in Japan. So obviously, percentage of yen earnings in Japan is not significant given that we have a lot of U. S. Dollar business and our yen our expenses are in yen. We do hedge our equity in Japan, and feel good about that. It's an active program. It is part of our broader capital management framework so that is all covered there. And with regards to ESR, obviously, when we implement ESR and when we look at ESR and capital levels being consistent, with AA levels of capital, we're factoring in the hedging program as well. Okay.
1h 4m 19s
Maybe shifting gears, the life insurance segment, you called it out as an area where there's some near term headwind, and I appreciate the reasons why, but same time, [indiscernible] core earnings power, I know there's a lot of volatility in the actual number, but the core number that you guys kind of pointed us to in your release looked stronger. I mean, I think it was the best number you put out since [indiscernible] 2021. So I just just be interested, is that not a sustainable number? Or is there some other nuance to the the first quarter number you produced?
1h 4m 59s
Alex, what I would say is, yes, we did see a slight growth in the core earnings power of the Individual Life business. That is reflective of the really the good business that we're writing. As you heard, Ann, say, we feel good about the new business we're writing. It's profitable. It's capital efficient. And over time, the benefit to earnings of those sales are coming through. And obviously, it's negatively impacted by the remaining GOL portion that in that business as well. But that's really what's going on. So if it's in core, it will be sustainable and it is not a one time item.
1h 5m 34s
Okay. Thank you.
1h 5m 37s
Thank you. Next question is coming from Mike Ward UBS. Your line is now live. Thanks guys. Good morning.
1h 5m 45s
I was just wondering if I appreciate the commentary on the alternatives sensitivity, but wondering if you have an updated view of overall sensitivities for 20 equity market or interest rate shocks just given the reduction in market sensitivities you've been working on?
1h 6m 4s
Yes. Good morning, Mike. We do. So let me share those. You may recall that following our variable annuity derisking transactions, we did specify that our earnings sensitivity had been reduced. By approximately 20%. So our earnings sensitivities remain relatively unchanged from those levels, but let me walk through them. From an equity market perspective, if we apply the same equity market shock that I spoke about for alternatives, so ten percent one time equity market declined, followed by a one in point 25% quarterly recovery, We would expect the AOI impact to be a reduction of about $0.30 per share on an annual basis. So that's the equity market shock. From an interest rate perspective, if we assume a 50 basis point one time interest rate decline, we expect the AOI impact to be about a 20% decline in EPS on an annual basis.
1h 7m 1s
Thanks, Janelle. That's helpful. And then maybe for Andy, just curious how you think about the common dividend in the context of capital priorities, just it seems like an increasingly significant use of capital and I think double your spend on buybacks. Just curious how that fits into the capital discussion. Thanks.
1h 7m 25s
Mike, I'm going to let Janella cover how we think about that capital deployment.
1h 7m 31s
Yes. So Mike, what I would say there is our capital deployment priorities and and how we think about it hasn't changed. We continue to apply a very thoughtful approach to balancing the preservation of financial strength and flexibility investing in our businesses for long term growth and supporting shareholder distributions both in the form of dividends and share repurchases I would reiterate that we continue to see valuable organic growth opportunities I would double click on the financial strength aspect of the priorities given the macro environment that we're seeing and we continue to confidently navigate the macro environment with our strong balance sheet. So we don't anticipate any changes. Thank you.
1h 8m 19s
Thank you. We've reached the end of our question and answer session. 'd like to turn the floor back over to Andy for any further or closing comments.
1h 8m 26s
Thank you everyone for joining us today. And I want to give a special thanks to our employees all around the world. For their commitment to our customers and to each other. I see tremendous opportunity ahead for our business. Our leadership team is well aligned on the priorities that will get us there. Evolving and delivering on our strategy, improving our execution and fostering our high performance culture. We're confident that we're near an inflection point towards a much stronger company.
1h 8m 53s
I look forward to keeping you updated on the progress along the way. Have a great day.
1h 8m 58s
Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.
Key Insights
Prudential reported Q1 2025 pretax adjusted operating income of $1.5B ($3.29 per share), up 8% year-over-year, driven by favorable underwriting in U.S. businesses and lower expenses, though alternative investment income was $90M below expectations.
The company reiterated its intermediate-term target of 5% to 8% average core adjusted operating EPS growth through 2027, despite near-term headwinds from U.S. business runoff (variable annuities and guaranteed universal life) and elevated surrenders in Japan, which are expected to create a 3-4 point drag on 2025 EPS growth.
PGIM assets under management rose 3% to $1.4T, with $4.3B in net flows (mainly institutional), and private alternatives deployment exceeded $10B (up 60% YoY), though activity slowed late in the quarter due to market uncertainty; PGIM’s path to a 25-30% adjusted margin remains on track over the intermediate term.
U.S. retirement strategies saw strong sales ($10B in Q1), including $7B in institutional retirement (with $5B from international longevity reinsurance) and $3.5B in individual retirement (up 5% YoY); group insurance sales rose 6%, and individual life sales grew 26%.
The company maintains a strong capital position with $4.9B in cash and liquid assets, above its $3B minimum target, and continues to focus on organic growth while considering disciplined inorganic opportunities; capital deployment priorities remain unchanged, with a focus on financial strength, growth investment, and shareholder returns.
