Ready Capital Corporation Price & Performance (RC)

Thank you, operator, and good morning to those of you on the call. Some of our comments today will be forward looking statements within the meaning of the federal Such statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect. Therefore, you should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on them. We refer you to our SEC filings for more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition. During the call, we will discuss our non GAAP measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating the company's operating performance. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these measures to the [indiscernible] is available in our fourth quarter twenty twenty four earnings release and our supplemental information, which can be found in the Investors section of the Ready Capital In addition to Tom and myself on today's call, we are also joined by Adam Zasmer, Freddie Capital's Chief Credit Officer. I will now turn it over to Chief Executive Officer, Tom Capacie. Thanks Andrew. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining the call today.

The fourth quarter concludes a year of mixed results in our business. In 2024, we and the broader CREIT sector continue to be impacted by the later innings of this cycle in our transitional CRE lending business. However, entering 2025, aggressive reserving on problem loans, rightsizing of the dividend the current cash earnings in an improving multifamily market, will accelerate the path to recovery. In contrast, our small business lending operations experienced significant origination growth of 1.7x harvesting capital investments made over the preceding years. To begin, we have undertaken two aggressive actions The first, a $284,000,000 combined CECL and valuation allowances This reserve resulted a 14% reduction in book value per share to $10.61 but by ring fencing 100% of the problem loans in sets a bottom This action lowers our basis in non performing loan providing asset managers more options for accelerated resolutions generating liquidity for reinvestment in higher yield new originations and in turn a recovery in our net interest margin. Or NIM. The second reduction of the dividend to $0.125 per share the dividend with projected cash earnings in the short term and to preserve book value. It will be our expectation to grow the dividend from this new level with improved earnings in future [indiscernible] We also set set it at this level to preserve capital for reinvestment in our core portfolio and to allow for more aggressive utilization of the recently announced $150,000,000 share repurchase program.

To be clear, we believe these actions will establish the bottom for both book value per share and dividend. In this context, to better frame that evaluation of future earnings and book value per share, and further enhance transparency Our late cycle portfolio asset management strategy involves splitting the CRE portfolio into two buckets, First, core assets designated as hold to maturity with strong credit metrics that generate competitive returns and second non core assets both originated and M and A. This bifurcation provides additional transparency to track our primary asset management strategy aggressive liquidation with a 3.1% cash yield non core book reinvestment of liquidity into 15% plus ROE core loans providing a path to recovery in NIM.

With the M and A portfolio successfully reduced to under 10% of total year end CRE portfolio, the prior classification of originated in M and A is no longer relevant. At year end, the CRE loan portfolio totaled $7,200,000,000 split 83% core and 17% non core. Our $6,000,000,000 core portfolio across approximately 1,500 loans evidences strong credit metric and yield metrics. Providing a solid foundation for the net interest margin to recover in 2025.

A contractual yield of 8% with a 93% pay rate.

Sixty day plus delinquencies are only 2% with an average risk rating of 286% is multifamily and mixed use or industrial. Average mark to market LTV is 78% average debt yields are 9.7% and the average maturity is twenty months. In 2024, the core portfolio contracted $1,300,000,000 as loans matured with reinvestment in new production limited to 85,000,000 resulting in eight forty basis points contribution to distributable ROE before realized losses versus our long term target of 11% to 13%. In 2025 through our various liquidity initiatives, notably liquidation of the non core portfolio, and collapse and reissuance of our CRE CLO book we expect to originate between $1,000,000,000 and $1,500,000,000 of new production in lower middle market CRE loans with increased pace as we move through the year.

In addition to the attractive return profile, Ready credit fundamentals have tightened with LTVs in the low 60s and debt yields over eight versus 2021 with mid 70s LTV 6% and mid-six percent debt yield. Of note, the current debt yield support refinancing into agency permanent loans with 8% required for twelve month debt yield based on the current forward yield curve. Our non core $1,200,000,000 portfolio is split into 59% RC originated loans, 8% M and A loans, and 33% in a high quality Portland, Oregon mixed use asset.

Excluding the Portland asset, the non core portfolio assets are tagged with aggressive liquidation strategies and have the following credit profile. Cash yield of 3.1%, sixty day delinquencies of 36%, risk rating comprised twenty four percent five rated thirteen percent four rated, and 63% with a three or better rating.

And 8% is concentrated in office and land. Based on our asset management plans, full liquidation of this portfolio will take approximately seven to ten quarters with nine assets currently under contract. Expected to generate approximately $20,000,000 of liquidity. The Portland mixed use asset is a $600,000,000 construction project acquired the twenty twenty two Mosaic transaction where RC holds a $5.00 $3,000,000 senior loan a $62,000,000 preferred equity position. As discussed in our last earnings call, construction was completed on the mixed use property in the fourth quarter with the Ritz Carlton Hotel opening October 2023. The property features a premier hospitality, retail office and residential offerings in Portland, with each component now moving to stabilization. Currently, the hospitality RevPAR is $188 The office and retail are leased 2300% respectively. And 8% of the condos are sold. While the original strategy was to refinance the construction into a bridge loan, the current appraisal and other factors favored ownership and serial asset disposition on the components as the best net present value outcome. The immediate impact to earnings is a quarterly reduction of $0.11 per share or three fifty basis points on ROE. However, we expect to offset these changes by Ready immediate reinvestment of proceeds received upon bringing the financing of the property to market advance rates and for reinvestment of proceeds from asset sales coincident with stabilization.

We have reserved $130,000,000 of our original exposure to mark the asset to its as is value based on a current appraisal. We also expect to recover our current senior loan basis over the next ten quarters as we stabilize the property. [indiscernible] Of note, the Mosaic loan represented idiosyncratic position in our otherwise granular lower middle market CRE loan portfolio with the remaining top 10 loan positions representing only 9% of the gross Turning to our small business lending operation, Ready Capital has become a leading non bank lender to small businesses providing a full suite of loan options. From a $10,000 unsecured working capital loans to $25,000,000 plus real estate backed USDA loans.

As of year end, Ready Capital was the number one non bank lender in number four overall SBA seven lender in the country. Fourth quarter originations of $350,000,000 across small business lending capped a record year of $1,200,000,000 including $1,100,000,000 of SBA loans $78,000,000 of unsecured working capital loans and a $7,000,000 of USDA production. The earnings contribution from our Small Business Lending segment is outsized representing only 8% of capital of contributing $0.08 per share or two ninety basis points of ROE. As the CRE NIM recovers with the liquidation of the non core portfolio, the stable contribution from our small business lending activities is another attractive differentiator for the company in the CREIT sector. Turning back to our outlook for 2025. We expect that the recovery to a 10% stabilized core return will take us through 2025 with the following four key items providing the bridge to that goal. First, as summarized on Page seven of our supplemental deck, the liquidation of our non core portfolio. As discussed previously, the liquidation of the non core RC originated and M and A portfolio will result in an annual benefit of $0.18 per share or 165 basis points on ROE.

Given the projected liquidation timeline, the increased earnings contribution is expected to be fully realized in 2026. Serial disposition of the three components of the writ project over ten quarters with the sale of hospitality office components occurring earlier upon stabilization. These sales are highly accretive and will result in an annual benefit of $0.31 share. Or two seventy five basis points to ROE by replacing the future negative yield of the asset with 15% plus retained yield bridge loans. Second, liability management, both securitized and corporate. As discussed in prior quarters, throughout 2024, the static structure of our CLOs resulted in rapid deleveraging of the cheap AAA tranches resulting in an inability to deploy payoffs into new loans and higher debt costs relative to the peer group. In 2025, our plan is to sequentially collapse the non core CLOs once callable and reissue more collateral efficient managed deals. Of our paid outstanding Ready, seven are currently callable with the remaining deal collapsible at June of this year. The first tranche of three deals totaling $1,300,000,000 of collateral will be called reissued in March with the higher advance rate providing reinvestment of $60,000,000 of liquidity projected to increase earnings $0.05 per share or 45 basis points in ROE.

With 65 basis points from first quarter of 'twenty four to 140 basis points Currently, serial reissuance will not only generate liquidity to grow the core portfolio, but reduce liability costs providing accretion to net interest margin. Additionally, the receptive corporate debt market where we've completed two issues totaling $350,000,000 since December 2024, provides the additional provides for additional recourse leverage, which at 1.3x remains below 1.5x to 2x target. Third, growth in our small business lending segment, which is positioned for 1.7x growth in 'twenty four.

Specifically, we anticipate $1,500,000,000 to be originated in our SBA seven lending business which should contribute $0.05 per share and 45 basis points in ROE. Through February, seven lending volume was $229,000,000 up 91% from the same period last year. Additionally, MadisonOne, the USDA lender acquired last June, is expected to originate $300,000,000 in volume in 2025. Due to larger loan sizes and complexity, the USDA volume is more variable quarterly, but the platform is expected to deliver incremental earnings of $0.05 per share or 45 basis points in ROE. Fourth, the closing of the UDF4 merger, which we expect to close in March, estimated to provide annual incremental earnings of 17% per share or 150 basis points on ROE. The cumulative effect of the current CRE cycle is is transitory pressure on earnings followed by subsequent recovery ROE as we execute on our plan. With that, I'll turn it over to Andrew to go through the quarterly results. Thanks, Tom.

Fourth quarter GAAP losses per common share were $1.9 distributable earnings showed a loss of $0.03 Excluding realized losses on asset sales, distributable earnings were $0.23 per common share representing a 7.1% return on average stockholders' equity. The distributable loss primarily reflects timing differences between valuation allowances previously recorded and realized losses from settlements in the fourth quarter. Four key factors impacted our quarterly earnings. Revenue from core operations which includes net interest income gain on sale income, net of variable costs servicing income and other investment income decreased $12,400,000 or 12% quarter over quarter to $91,600,000 The change was primarily due to first 900,000 of lower net interest income due to a 7% decline in portfolio assets quarter over quarter and a slight increase in nonaccrual loans, which averaged 4.6% in the quarter. The gross interest yield in the quarter was 8.7% and the cash yield was 7%. $20,600,000 of interest income recorded in the quarter was paid in time interest on our construction loans and $14,700,000 of interest income recorded was accrued on modified books. Second, gain on sale income, net of variable costs, decreased 5,400,000.0 to $20,900,000 This income was driven by the sale of $211,000,000 of guaranteed SBA seven eighty loans at average premiums of 10.4% and the sale of $116,000,000 of Freddie Mac Ready at premiums of 0.9%.

Third, servicing income was up $1,300,000 in the quarter due to a $1,600,000 non cash impairment in the SBA 7A MSRs due to a change in discount rate. The total service balance across all products averaged $9,000,000,000 in the quarter. And last, revenue from other investment activities which include the collection of rent, proceeds from the sale of working capital loans, and income on JV investments decreased $20,600,000 These other revenue sources are reoccurring. Turning to operating costs from normal operations, which were $57,900,000 compared to $53,100,000 in the prior quarter. The increase in operating costs was primarily due to higher legal expense related to corporate development activities and an increase in servicing fees and advances. We expect operating expenses to to decline as we move out of the non core portfolio and our OpEx ratio to decline upon closing of UDF merger. Moving on, the combined provision for loan loss and valuation allowance increased hundred and $53,800,000 The additional $242,700,000 in CECL reserves was primarily due to an increase of reserves on non core assets. The reduction in the valuation allowance is due to a $64,500,000 recovery from loan sales and foreclosures offset by a $5,900,000 increase on loans remaining on the balance sheet at quarter end.

The release of the valuation allowances relates to the settlement of $116,000,000 of loan sales. And the last piece that impacted earnings were several items not generated or incurred in our normal operations. These include amongst others a $17,200,000 loss on this which reflects a mark to final realizable value upon settlement of the sale mark to market losses of $12,900,000 on fair value position, and $4,600,000 of transaction expenses related to debt and M and A activity. Non cash REO charge offs included in other operating expense We have included an updated presentation of the earnings on Slide 12 of the financial supplement to distinguish between normalized operations and other items affecting profitability. On the balance sheet, book value per share is now $10.61 per share versus $12.59 per share last quarter. The book value change was due to an increase in the combined CECL and valuation [indiscernible] A $0.43 shortfall on dividend coverage from earnings absent the increase in combined allowance. These changes were offset by a $0.18 per share increase due to a share due to share repurchases, which totaled 5,800,000.0 shares at an average price of $7.35 per share.

As Tom mentioned, we expect to begin to execute on the new $150,000,000 share repurchase program, which will contribute to enhancing shareholder return this year. Liquidity remains strong and is expected to improve. Since the last earnings call, we have raised $350,000,000 of corporate financing across two transactions, The most recent announced last week was a $220,000,000 senior secured note issued out of the taxable REIT subsidiary. $182,000,000 of the proceeds from this offering will go towards retiring our senior notes due April 2025 and a portion of our 2026 maturities. The remaining $38,000,000 will be invested into the business. With that, we will open the line for questions.

Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. The first question is coming from Crispin Love of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. So first on the dividend and core earnings power, you've cut the dividend to $12.12.0.5 dollars Starting in the first quarter, would you expect cash earnings to cover that level? And then just how do you think about the earnings power over the next several quarters on a cash and non cash basis?

Good morning, Kristen.

So the first quarter is definitely going to be the lowest quarter of the year. Primarily impacted by the fact that The majority of the non core bucket [indiscernible] booked on a cash basis given the liquidation strategy. So the effect, the cumulative effect of that including the Ready is roughly a $0.14 drawdown from where those assets were in 2024. So the expectation is over the course of the year, that we cover the dividend approximately 1.5 times. But the earnings profile will ramp up to further coverage as we move along in the year. And the bridge to that is a couple of items. The first, I just explained what the the drawdown is going to be based on the non core portfolio. OpEx savings mainly from further cut in Funding Circle as well as staffing and some other overhead should generate an annual benefit of $0.05 from this level. That will be have a more immediate impact Madison one, which is our USDA lender is expected to come online towards the back half of the first quarter and into the second quarter We expect that to generate $0.05 of incremental earnings in the year. The SBA business as Tom mentioned in his comments, continues to experience exponential growth.

We think that volume growth of $200,000,000 to $500,000,000 flat and incremental $0.03 to $0.07 per share And then as Tom mentioned, UDF which we expect to close in March should add an incremental $0.17 So we think on a pro form a basis, not even taking into consideration the reinvestment of core the non core loans upon liquidation So we get to that 1.5 times coverage on the current dividend Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Doug Harter of UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks. I was hoping you could talk a little bit more around the decision on UDF and I guess putting that in context, if you look back at the at the prior acquired deals you've done and kind of given the credit challenges from those portfolios, you think that the returns penciled out to this point and why acquiring another highly distressed portfolio makes sense.

Andrew, do you want to touch on that in particular? The basis under which we're acquiring the portfolio, the the ten year history, I believe, it's about ten year history of buying a little over $100,000,000 of loans and the stress tests around the GSE stress tests around the home prices. [indiscernible] the mechanics of the merger called for some fairly aggressive discounts on the current basis in those projects. So we think given the the actual basis Ready capital is booking on those loans that even in a a pretty aggressive downturn, The principal in the trade is covered. Now there may be some yield pressure if that happens. But the basis is at a level where we are highly confident that From a credit perspective, it is secure. I'd say the other thing that gives us comfort is, as Tom mentioned, over the years, we've done $100,000,000 of loans. Many of those loans are in the projects and some of the projects that that we are acquiring as part of the M and A. And so we have a very good knowledge base on these projects, the historical performance of those loans has been pristine. So I think the combination of the basis and the underwriting and our experience in these actual projects gives us a Okay.

And then you mentioned kind of the reserve actions this quarter looking to ring fence the known problem assets.

How do you think about the remaining assets and the risk of kind of additional additional problems and how should we take comfort that there won't be needs for additional significant reserving actions. Yes, Adam, you want to touch on on the methodology under which we bifurcated the portfolio. With Doug, I think the specific reference is to potential negative migration [indiscernible] the core portfolio, where the risk rating is only to So maybe to discuss methodology into which we bifurcated the existing portfolio and then from there the we'll call it, if you will, the potential higher risk elements of the strong credit core portfolio loans that were previously modified. Yes, sure. Hey, Doug. Yes, the core portfolio, which is 83% of the overall portfolio, These are really assets that we deem to be long term holds where you have healthy credit metrics that generate good returns We had minimal future losses expected on those. The majority of those are call it, 86% is multifamily and industrial. The average maturity of that that portfolio is is twenty months. The mods within the core portfolio the majority are cash flowing with healthier debt yields. We bifurcated into core where sponsors have equity that they put into these new mods.

And the collateral is really closer to executing on the business plan we feel that the probability of takeout at maturity is significant [indiscernible] versus the non core. On the non core, this is really the bucket of more challenging loans that we've this represents 17% of the portfolio These are where we're going to have short term holdings and the primary asset management strategy as Tom mentioned is really an expeditious liquidation. These assets have lower yields, less viable path to stabilization and takeout, the multifamily specifically agency take out. Little or no fresh equity from the from the borrowers inside of those modifications And we feel that ultimately, if we don't liquidate specifically on the loan side, there'll be a higher probability of foreclosure. So we really bifurcated the two where we are laser being focused on the non core on the expeditious liquidations, that we expect to execute over the next seven to ten quarters. Yes. And I want to just add to that, Doug.

I think this is systemic to the industry. Especially on the multifamily side where you look to bridge to I'm sorry, to loans that have been made it through the rate hike period and 2025 saying a year ago, stay alive '25 while rates didn't go down. So what's now what you're now seeing is loans that were previously modified split into two buckets. One is strong projects, good sponsors, liquidity, mark to market LTVs in that kind of we are here in this portfolio in the upper 70s. And those are those will qualify more highly likely to qualify for either a bridge to bridge or stabilized takeout with the Freddie FreddieFannie Ready.

And I point out that the metric there is a debt yield on the core portfolio was 9.7 And Adam, what's the debt yield required for refi in the current market? Yes, cost average 8% to 9%. Did you have almost 200 basis point premium on that book versus the non core, which is significantly lower debt yield. So that that I think and again, the other thing about our Ready, Ready is that our CRE CLOs are static, so there's no hiding, if you will, maybe a strong word, but no ability to not disclose the nature of the the status of the bridge loans. So what we're doing here is we're taking a very conservative approach to bifurcating the loans that we think are best suited for accelerated resolution strategies That's about the non core, it's about $1,000,000,000 marked at $0.82 And and then highlight the non core book And then going forward, able from a transparency perspective investors are able to track the migration from liquidation of the core and the the credit performance of the core portfolio. Great. Appreciate those answers. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Jade Rahmani of KBW. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. Regarding the twenty twenty six maturities, what's the plan to address those? I think it's I estimated about 7,000,000? Hey, good morning, Jade.

So we started to address some of it with our senior secured notes We issued last week a portion of the proceeds as we said in the prepared remarks are go to retire those. So when we So when we look out, there are a handful of maturities in the beginning part of the year so there's $158,000,000 due in February. Dollars $90,000,000 due in July. We for those two maturities, certainly the projected cash flow and liquidity profile of the business support taking those out in cash, but our preference will be to access the market as we move into the summer months. And then looking out further into 'twenty six, there's a senior secured note dollars $350,000,000 that comes due in October. And a smaller issuance that comes due in November, which is roughly $100,000,000 Our plan is to continue to position the business over the course of this year such that the financial profile allows us to start thinking about some of the larger debt markets to to handle those securities. Those those debt issuances. But we continue to believe we've proven access to a variety of corporate markets We will continue to lean into those markets And then the only thing I other thing I'd point out, Jade, is that the asset maturity ladder aligns very closely with the liability ladder.

So Those are the various paths we'll undertake to take care of those.

Thank you. On the UDF four merger, is the rationale that you see compelling value in the assets and upside to the basis of which you're crying the assets or alternatively are you looking to replenish the unencumbered asset pool that the company has in order to maintain unsecured access? I mean that really would explain the logic behind the Broadmark and Mosaic mergers because those unencumbered assets allow you to issue And so this kind of a deal is somewhat necessary in order to replenish that pool of unencumbered assets.

Just to Andrew, if you could comment on Ajay, but I'd say the Ready detra for the transaction is is 95% number one. It's highly accretive on a on an EPS basis unlevered. And that's how we view the transaction. The icing on the cake, if you will, is the ability to create leverage given the fact that it is unlevered. But we evaluated at the Board and the management team evaluated this based on, again, a ten year relationship with the company, We'll view it as one of our non non bridge strategies going forward. In terms of the whole residential lot loan market. So that's just to answer your question, I think that's how we viewed the transaction, less the again, the leverage was not really considered. It was really more of the the accretion to EPS from the actual asset yield itself. Adam, Andrew, if you'd add anything to that?

No, I think that's right. I think there's an incremental benefit As you alluded to, bringing on unlevered equity and improves the leverage ratios, it will improve on encumbered asset pool. So the financial profile of the balance sheet from a debt metrics standpoint improves post merger. Which will allow us should we choose to pull debt out of that equity over time. But the main driver of this transaction was was the earnings profile.

Okay.

Fair enough. I mean, I find that somewhat surprising because we're in the middle of a credit cycle, there's so many uncertainties. So taking on additional problem assets to work out adds further stress to the business model and it might not be the right time for that. But understand what you're saying about the potential for accretion. The last question is on the S SBA business. We like to look around corners and see risks that we may not see coming right now. And I did notice with the SBA lenders 4Q results showed a notable deterioration in the fourth quarter. It doesn't [indiscernible] like we saw that within Ready Capital's Ready, but can you discuss the credit trends you're seeing in SBA And on the Doge side, any administrative changes to SBA you're seeing that could potentially impact the business? Yes. Actually, let's tackle the first the second one first.

And Andrew, maybe you could comment at some of the the relatively differentiated credit trends we're seeing in our portfolio. Obviously, we're the largest non bank lender and the second fourth largest overall And we've undertaken a strategy where we a dual strategy whereby we use the more traditional loan officer approach for large loans where the average balance has been running goes up to $5,000,000 in the SBA and average balance in that program has been running 1,500,000.0 And then we have the small loan program, which uses a scorecard and that's part of our FinTech, which is a essentially a lender service provider to the SBL, the small business lending company. So And we have about a healthy fifty-fifty mix there and we've had very strong credit trends in both both of those, which Andrew can maybe touch on some of the what you're seeing with the but what we're seeing with the industry as a whole. But just to on the doge side, so I've had a couple of [indiscernible] President of our business, Gary Taylor, has had a number of conversations with the SBA. And bottom line is, it's mom and apple pie on both sides of the aisle always has been.

Yes, there's some concerns about what occurred during PPP with fraud and losses there and that sort of thing. But we haven't heard anything that would significantly impact the commitment in terms of the authorization of the it's usually about $25,000,000,000 to $30,000,000,000 a year So there may be a few accelerated retirements, but we haven't heard anything specific about any sort of major overhaul of the program, which would impact commitments, the authorization of congressional congressional authorization of the seven program on an ongoing basis. So Andrew, maybe with that, maybe just touch on any some of the terms of our risk management reviews, what we've been seeing in terms of credit in the SBA versus the industry?

Yes. On the credit side for For small business, the 60 plus delinquencies remain at a moderate level. So there are 2.8% today. Certainly doing over the past year to year and a half, certainly seeing more growth in our small balance and micro loans which historically given the non real estate component have had higher delinquency levels, which is expected for those small loans. That bucket today sits at about 2.4%, 60% plus. On the small balance and microloans. Think from a business perspective, we're still lodging is still our largest asset class. And it's historically performed extremely well even through the pandemic. These are really hospitality assets that are in smaller markets, limited service, mom and pop operators that have historically performed well But yes, I mean, expectation is that delinquencies could shift up given the growth in the small balance and micro, but at this point, we're the asset management teams are monitoring the portfolio carefully, and we don't see any concerning trends.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Stephen Laws of Raymond James.

Hi, good morning. You've been on most of our topics, but one follow-up on the SBA. Segment. Can you talk about the cash flow or what is the operating cash flow look like versus the gain on sale of loans and kind of how do we think about the mix there? Andrew, do you want to touch on that?

Yes. From a From a free cash flow perspective, the SBA business It's highly positive. When you just think about the the process of the loan, we are basically recovering our full basis in that origination very, very quickly through both sale and financing on the unguaranteed piece. So as we move forward, the incremental growth in that business and the the gain on sale that comes off of that business is going to be a key part of improving the free cash flow from operations of the overall company. Now the one thing I will will say is over the last couple of months here, we have been contributing quite a bit of capital down into that business as several warehouse lines approval for the SBA. So we currently have three warehouse lines that are in the process of approval and we expect approval totaling $100,000,000 And so the financial profile of the SBA business given that there's been more equity invested into it over the last couple of months, [indiscernible] But we do expect that to to rebound and for the majority of that business to be run through those warehouse lines as we move into the second quarter.

But to answer your direct question, incremental growth in that business pays the job right to the bottom line in terms of improving [indiscernible] Great. Appreciate it. Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Christopher Nolan of Ladenburg Thalmann. Please ahead.

Hi. For the acquisition, what and because of comments was the Ready is expected to be immediately accretive to earnings. What's your assumption of delinquencies in that portfolio developing over the next couple of quarters?

Yes. I think, Adam, it would be helpful if you could answer that, but just to frame it, important to understand that the UDF portfolio represents a very seasoned portfolio of residential lot loans that are essentially the land banking business where these loans the projects are approved on a serial basis over many, many years We've been doing business for a decade with the company And the residential lot loan business is a very well understood private credit asset class. In the private markets. So, and I there was a prior comment that the portfolio is problem loans These loans are not these are really strong projects in the Dallas Metroplex. With very strong offtake from homebuilders. So Adam, maybe just comment broadly on the question and the portfolio itself and the yield and cash flow profile in terms of the the For example, the amount of liquidity we've seen in the portfolio today versus when we did the transaction in I looked at the transaction in September. [indiscernible] good morning, Chris. Just to answer your first question regarding delinquencies, this This portfolio is fully performing today. Every loan is has a maturity through the end of twenty twenty eight.

And these loans, the way these these land lot loans are structured, they have accrued interest component So through the end of twenty twenty eight, we don't expect any delinquency in this portfolio. The portfolios comprise, I think as you know, entirely in the state of Texas that continues to show extremely strong metrics in regards to population growth, job growth, etcetera. And the projects continuing to build Yep. National and regional homebuilders are out of these projects continuing to build. Multiple phases at these sites. I think given the maturity here, and the basis that we acquired these sorry, the basis we'll be acquiring these assets at, we feel very comfortable credit profile and the recoveries at our basis.

Separate topic, what is the pace of repurchases you're expecting? Because you guys have a lot of headwinds going on just with the sector and so forth and maturities coming up. And it seems like capital is going to be quite scarce even though it might be really attractive to buy back stock. But what's the timeline for the share repurchases?

Hey, good morning. Yes. So I think there is is a variety of liquidity events happening over the next couple of months here that are expected to generate growth from where we're at today at $185,000,000 The class of the CLOs in in March is expected to generate $60,000,000 Certainly, the sales of the non core portfolio are expected to generate a significant amount of liquidity And so the pace throughout the year is going to be somewhat dependent upon the timing of those items. But given the return profile, it is certainly going to be a key part of our plan to deliver shareholder return With that being said, certainly, we continue to position the business to carry a higher level of cash given the environment we're operating in.

So there is some limitation there. But we expect to be active in the repurchase program throughout the year.

Great. And then just as a comment, going forward, if you guys could provide more time for us to review the earnings release before the call because it was less than an hour And it's quite complex company. Moving parts. So if you can keep that in consideration, that'd be appreciated.

Yes, we appreciate that. And we'll undertake to address that.

Thank you. At this time, I would like turn the floor back over to Mr. Capaci for closing comments.

So with the dividend cut and the CECL reserves, we expect that these actions were critical to accelerate the recovery in net interest margin and ROE over the succeeding year when we fully look we are fully highly confident in terms of our ability to develop those goals and look forward to the next quarter's earnings call. You. Thanks everybody and have a good day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's event. You may disconnect your lines or log off the webcast at this time and enjoy the rest of your day.