Toll Brothers, Inc. Price & Performance (TOL)

While our net income and earnings per share came in below expectations, this was due primarily to impairments and a delay in the sale of a stabilized apartment property in one of our joint ventures. Our core homebuilding operations met expectations in the quarter. From a demand perspective, we signed 2,307 net contracts for $2,300,000,000 in the first quarter, up 13% in units and 12% in dollars compared to last year's very strong first quarter when contracts were up approximately 40% in both units and dollars. On a per community basis, contracts were up 2% compared to last year. We also continue to see a very healthy deposit conversion ratio in the first quarter with 82% of our deposits converted to sales significantly higher than our five year average of 70%. The average sales price of orders in our first quarter was which was essentially unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four. On average, net pricing after incentives was flat in the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four. Geographically, first quarter demand was strongest in our North And Mid Atlantic region. From Boston to Atlanta. As well as Houston, Dallas, Boise, Denver, Las Vegas and all of California.

Among our buyer segments both move up and first time luxury were up on a per community basis with a slight decline in empty nester. Although demand was solid in our first quarter, we have seen mixed results. So far this spring selling season. While demand has remained healthy in many of our markets, and particularly at the higher end, affordability constraints and growing inventories in certain markets are pressuring sales. Especially at the lower end. However, all that being said, we are somewhat encouraged by our sales activity this past week. Against this backdrop, we are incentives and spec inventory on a community by community basis to match to best match local selling conditions and to appropriately balance pace and price with a view towards generating higher returns in our overall business. Based on our first quarter results, the gross margin embedded in our backlog and the mix trends that we are seeing early in the spring selling season, we are maintaining all of our key homebuilding guidance for the full year. Including deliveries, average price, adjusted gross margin SG and A margin and community count growth. We continue to see the long term outlook the new home market to be very positive particularly for our luxury niche.

Demand for our homes continues to be supported by our affluent customer base.

Over 70% of our business is luxury move up and empty nester. Which serves a wealthy cohort that has benefited from years of home price and stock market The remaining 25% to 30% serves as more affluent first time buyer many of whom are older millennials buying their first home later in life when they have higher incomes and are more financially secure. Consistent with the past several quarters, approximately 26% of our buyers paid all cash in the first quarter, and the LTVs for buyers who took a mortgage was approximately 68% also consistent with recent quarters.

Our contract cancellation rate in the first quarter remained low at 2.4% of beginning backlog. This industry low cancel as well as the sizable deposits they make and how emotionally invested they become as they personalize their homes at our design studios. In the first quarter, our spec homes represented and 52% of deliveries. And we had approximately 3,200 spec homes in inventory at quarter end. Overall, we are comfortable with this level of specs in our inventory and their stage of construction. As I mentioned, we are actively managing our spec starts and we'll adjust them on a community by community basis based on local market conditions. This will mean fewer starts in some communities where inventories are building and may mean increased starts in other communities where demand has been strong. However, on a net basis, we do expect to reduce overall spec starts in the near term. Remember, we sell our specs at various stages of construction from foundation poured to finished home. One third of our specs Toll before framing is completed so the risk profile and margin for these homes is not all that different from build to order homes. In addition, many of our spec buyers have the opportunity to visit our design studios and personalize their homes with finishes that match their taste.

This benefits our margins as design studio upgrades tend to be highly accretive. In the first quarter, design studio upgrades Structural Options, Plus Lot Premiums averaged $200,000 or 25% of our average base sales price as compared to the long term average of about 21% At first quarter end, we were operating from four zero six communities, slightly below the $410,000,000 that we guided to last quarter. We continue to target 8% to 10% community count growth in fiscal twenty twenty five which would put us at four forty to four fifty communities by fiscal year end. In the quarter, we saw modest improvements in our construction cycle times, as we continue to focus on increasing production efficiency. We have not seen any immediate supply chain impacts from tariffs or labor shortages due to changes in immigration policies. Although we are monitoring developments closely, and Toll pivot as necessary to deal with any issues that arise. We have all learned valuable lessons from the supply chain shocks we navigated through a few years ago with the pandemic. During the land, as the first quarter end, we owned or controlled approximately 700 lots 56% of which were optioned, We are pleased that we continue to make progress in the quarter towards a goal of 60% optioned and 40% owned.

Our solid land position provides us flexibility and allows us to be highly selective and disciplined as we assess new land opportunities. Our underwriting standards for the new land continue to incorporate stringent thresholds for both margins and returns and we continue to seek out land acquisition and development opportunities that allow us to be more capital efficient including through entries of option arrangements, land banks, joint ventures and similar structures that allow us to defer payments and lot takedown. Our balance sheet is very healthy. Have increased liquidity low net debt and no significant debt maturities this fiscal year. As announced last week, we recently extended the maturities of our credit facilities to February 2030, and upsized our revolver to $2,350,000,000 We also continue to expect strong cash flow generation from operations this year and reaffirm our $500,000,000 of targeted full year share repurchases. We expect to continue investing in the growth of our business while simultaneously returning excess capital to our shareholders Toll. With that, I will turn it over to Marty. Thanks, Doug.

First quarter net income was $177,700,000 or $1.75 per share diluted. These results were below expectations due to impairments, and lower than projected joint venture land sales and other income. The miss on joint venture and other income was mainly due to a delay in the sale of a stabilized apartment building from one of our joint ventures. We now expect this sale, which is under contract, to close in the second half of fiscal twenty twenty five.

Positively, our core homebuilding operations met expectations. In the first quarter, we delivered nineteen ninety one homes, at an average price of $925,000 and generated home sales revenue of $1,840,000,000 The average price of homes delivered in the quarter was at the low end of our range due primarily to mix as we delivered more homes in our Mountain Region and had fewer deliveries in the North And Pacific regions, than we had projected. As Doug mentioned, signed 2,307 net agreements for $2,300,000,000 in the quarter.

This was up 13% in units and 12% in dollars compared to the first quarter of fiscal year twenty twenty four.

The average price of contracts signed in the quarter was approximately $1,000,000 which was essentially flat compared to both the fourth quarter of fiscal twenty twenty four and the same period last year. Our first quarter adjusted gross margin was 26.9%, 65 basis points better than our guidance of 26.25%. Q1 gross margin exceeded our guidance due primarily to mix, increased operating efficiency and slightly better margin from sell and settle spec homes compared to what we had projected. All regions and all property segment project product segments exceeded our expectations. Based on our first quarter results, the gross margin embedded in our backlog and the mix trends that we are seeing early in the spring selling season we are maintaining our full year adjusted gross margin guidance. Of 27.25%. We expect our second quarter adjusted gross margin to also be 27.25%. Write offs in our home sale gross margin totaled $16,400,000 in the quarter, dollars 3,900,000.0 of these impairments were associated with pre development costs on deals we are no longer pursuing. And the remaining $12,500,000 was related to a handful of operating communities in various markets around the country. We also had $1,800,000 of land sale impairments and $4,400,000 of pre development write offs in other income related to apartment projects, we are no longer pursuing. 13.1% in the first quarter compared to our guide of 12.7%.

Note that our SG and A margin in the first quarter is always higher as it is generally our lowest revenue quarter and includes an accelerated employee stock based compensation expense that only hits in that first quarter. The 40 basis point SG and A miss relative to our guidance was due to the loss of fixed cost leverage. Due to lower than anticipated homebuilding revenues as well as due to higher than anticipated selling and marketing expenses in the quarter. Our tax rate in the first quarter was 19.7% or about two thirty basis points lower than the guidance due entirely to the accounting benefit of stock compensation deductions, on a lower base of pre tax income. These stock compensation deductions will not repeat in the balance of the year. We ended the first quarter with over $2,300,000,000 of liquidity including approximately $575,000,000 of cash and $1,800,000,000 of availability under our revolving bank credit facility. We've added $400,000,000 to that subsequent to the quarter end as Doug mentioned, we increased the capacity of our revolving credit facility and we also extended the maturities of both our revolver and our $650,000,000 term loan to February 2030.

We thank our banks for their continuing support. Our net debt to capital ratio was down from twenty one point four percent one year ago. We have no significant maturities of our long term debt until fiscal twenty twenty six, when $350,000,000 of notes come due this November. Our community count at quarter end was four zero six compared to our guide of four ten. Now let me turn to our forward guidance. Which is subject to the usual caveats regarding forward looking information. We are projecting fiscal twenty twenty five second quarter deliveries of approximately 2,500 to 2,700 homes, with an average delivered price between $940,000 and $960,000 For full fiscal year 2025, we are maintaining our projected deliveries to be between 222,600 homes, with an average price between $945,000 and $965,000 As I noted earlier, we expect adjusted gross margin to be 27.25% for both the second quarter and the full year. We expect interest in cost of sales to be approximately 1.2% in the second quarter. And for the full year. We project second quarter SG and A as a percentage of home sales revenues to be approximately 10.3%. For the full year, we continue Toll [indiscernible] [indiscernible] Other income, income from unconsolidated entities and land sales gross profit in the second quarter is expected to breakeven.

We continue to expect $110,000,000 for the full year which includes the sale of several stabilized department projects in the second half, As noted earlier, we had planned to close one of these apartment sales in the first quarter, The sale is under contract and the transaction is now expected to close in the second half of the year.

We project the second quarter tax rate to be approximately 26% and the full year rate to be approximately 25.5%. Based on land we currently own or control, we expect to grow community count by 8% to 10% by the end of fiscal twenty twenty five. And are targeting four forty to four fifty communities. We expect to be operating from four fifteen selling communities at the end of the second quarter. Our weighted average share count is expected to be approximately 101,000,000 shares for the second quarter and 100,500,000.0 shares for the full year. This assumes we repurchased a targeted $500,000,000 common stock for the full year. With most of that occurring later in the year aligned with our anticipated higher cash flows. Now let me turn it back to Doug. Thank you, Marty.

Before I open it up for questions, I'd like to thank our Toll Brothers employees for their hard work, dedication and commitment to our customers. Their talent and constant focus on our business is the driver of our long term success.

Okay. Chuck, let's open it up to questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. As a reminder, the company is planning to end the call at 09:30 when the market opens. During the question and answer session, please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. And our first question will come from Stephen Kim with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead. Yes. Thanks very much guys. Appreciate all the color. I guess, I wanted to start off by just Toll about your inventory. You talked about the fact that your spec levels were you were comfortable [indiscernible] actually came in a little lighter than we were expecting. So that all seems positive. That being said, your inventory did rise a lot. Particularly the construction in progress number rose pretty significantly. And I was curious if you could talk about what drove that Was there something about the land or the land on which you're building these homes which has a greater value? Are you just are you at a later stage of construction, but you're just comfortable with it? Just you could help us understand sort of what's going into the much higher inventory number that we saw this quarter.

Yes, Stephen. I think you hit it at it. I think we have more specs under construction and they're at a little bit further stage of completion stage of spend.

Than they had been in prior years or more recently And that's with an eye towards having the inventory to hit our 11,400 delivery guidance for this year. [indiscernible] thought you were going to continue there because you also had talked about the fact that you were looking to maybe slow down a little bit on your specs, as you headed later in the year. Later in the year. Is this something that we should just is this just kind of the natural cadence that we should expect to see from you from this point forward as we go into the spring, just carry more specs and that sort of thing and then sort of bringing that down as we go later in the year?

Yes, Steve, we definitely focus on Seasonality, when most buyers are in the market, when most buyers want to move in, which is generally the summer months and we try to time the start and the construction and of course then the completion of our spec inventory so it lines up with seasonality and I think that's what you're seeing right now. We have 3,200 spec homes that are at the beginning of framing or forward. So framing and beyond And then we have about 1,000 specs that are sitting at foundation. Some of those are on hold at foundation. Where we haven't yet released them for framing. And then we have about 1,600 specs that are sitting at permit that have not been released yet for foundations to go in. And this is all strategic. It's all based on the timing of the year. We're very comfortable with where the levels stand. We did this on purpose to set up for the spring and for the summer delivery Over time, over short term timing, we do expect to cut back a bit on the new spec starts. So when I tell you that there are 1,600 at permit but they've been held and are not authorized to go to foundation, We're keeping an eye on that closely.

When I tell you there's 1,000 at foundation that haven't yet been released for framing, that's all strategic and intentional. It is all decided by market There are some markets that are performing very Toll. Where we are actually increasing our spec activity and there's other markets as we've talked about that have had more mixed results lately. Where we are being more tempered. And so this is the analysis we do. But at the moment, We are leaning more towards less spec starts than you've seen in the past.

I just add to that.

Doug, that it's even more specific than by market. It's by community. Although the mentality often applies by market. [indiscernible] Yes. That's very helpful. And it kind of leads into the next question that I have, which is about the spring selling season. So you made the comment about it being mixed and I think that that is something that we've been hearing from a number of Toll. I guess what I really wanted to posture relative to your production pipeline and your anticipated land spend, over the next year or two in light if the spring selling season continues to be mixed, is this an environment which will cause you to have to pivot in some way? And if so, what kind of pivot or nudging the dial one way or the other? Should we be expecting, if the spring selling season remains mixed? [indiscernible] the spring selling season remains mixed, The overall land spend will come down. We will become more conservative in certain markets in the underwriting of new land as you know and as we brag about all the time, we have a terrific pipeline of owned and optioned land We are in great shape in all of our markets.

We have the opportunity to be very selective While we haven't guided to 26 community count growth, I can tell you that the land we control today provides the opportunity to continue growing communities as we have the last [indiscernible] without running out and finding any more land. So it's a very local business. We will still be active in the land buying business, but overall, the land spend would come down.

The next question will come from John Lovallo with UBS. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions as well. Maybe just starting off on the gross margin. The second quarter gross margin outlook seem to imply sort of steady fiscal year 2Q to 4Q gross margins to achieve that full year target of twenty twenty seven point two five. So I guess the question is, how are you thinking about incentives in that forecast? Are you assuming pretty fairly stable levels with what we saw in the first quarter? Sure. So the second quarter gross margin with our guide jumping up to 27.25 is because we expect to have more Pacific which is higher margin, We expect to have more luxury and a bit less affordable luxury and empty nester. Or age targeted So the mix aligns with that increased guide. When you look to the second half of the year, obviously, it needs to be modestly above 2,725.

Modestly. It's a comment that it's pretty steady. It's a pretty good comp. Because the first quarter only had 2,000 deliveries. So the 26,009 is off of a smaller part of it's not a quarter of the year, it's less than that. So we continue to see in the second half of the year pretty much what I just described, which is more Pacific, more North and North has been very high margin as the Northern region as we talked about has been very strong.

And we have more luxury than we have affordable and [indiscernible] With respect to your question about our confidence level and how we have budgeted, because we do recognize there are a number of sales that haven't occurred yet, We do have 6,300 homes in backlog. We have delivered 2,000 homes in the first quarter. So that is 8,300 of the $11,400,000 I'm not saying every home and backlog delivers, but most of that delivers. But we do recognize that there are some homes that still have to be sold. Many of those are spec All I'll tell you is we have a great level of confidence in the conservatism we have brought to the pricing, the incentivizing that needs to occur community by community, market by market, to complete the year with the balance of those sales, and still hit the guided margin. [indiscernible] [indiscernible] The specs we have with roughly 1,000 of them complete And so the cost there is known. There's no variable variability in that cost. And the specs we have under construction which is another 2,300 or 2,400 behind that, are contracted for. And so the costs are pretty well locked down there. Gives us further confidence in terms of what we will sell and settle from this point forward through the balance of the year, And we base our estimates based on what we're seeing in the market most recently for the balance of the year with some conservatism.

Okay. So you're not assuming any relief from rates or any pullback in incentives is what I was trying to get at. [indiscernible] Yes, that's helpful. And then on the lower some of the lower price inventory negatively impacting sales, I'm curious what price points specifically that you were seeing some of that competition, what markets you're referring to? I mean, we've heard from some of the more entry level focus folks that the inventory at the very low level is still fairly limited. So I'm just curious where you guys were seeing that real competition intensifying?

Sure. So So when we go down in price, it's not nearly as low as many of the other builders and what many define as a starter market. Our 25% to 30% of our business that is first time buyer Toll still the affluent luxury end of the first time buyer. They're a bit older, late 30s. They may have a combined family income of $200,000 and they can [indiscernible] a $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 home even in today's rate market. So we rarely go down into the territory where I think there's been the most pain and there's the most affordability pressure I mentioned in my prepared comments our stronger markets The softer markets in the first quarter included Jacksonville, Tampa, San Antonio Toll, Phoenix, Reno, Salt Lake City and Portland, which are very small for us. But I will say based on the last week or so of activity, and it's very early, this is a very fluid market. We are a bit encouraged by what's happened in the last week or so. In several of these markets that were soft in Q1 So I would if it was one week you asked me about, I probably take Jacksonville, Tampa, and even Phoenix off the list.

Again, I'm not going to be all that bold because it's one week. But those would be the places where we're feeling the most pressure, particularly as you come down a bit in price. The next question will come from Trevor Allanson with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. First, following up on the geographical question thinking about Southern California and Washington D. C, demand in those markets, Southern California with the wildfires and then DC with the Doge Impact On Potential Employment There. Have You Started To See Any Impacts To Either Of Those Markets Either From The Wildfires Or Just From Overall Employment Uncertainty In DC?

No.

Washington D. C. Which for us is Maryland, Northern Virginia is strong.

Southern Cal, strong.

Okay. Great. It's good to hear. And then second, last Toll, we consistently heard of buyers postponing home purchases expecting rates to come down in 2025. And for your buyer who generally is not battling qualification issues, the rates not moving lower here. Are you starting to see a shift where some of those buyers that were maybe waiting before for rates to come down are starting to get back into the market and transact here. And then if not, can you talk about maybe what's holding them back? Is that still an expectation for rates to move lower or anything else to call out?

Think in some markets, we are seeing what you described. Our buyers are affluent. Nobody loves the six and seven, eight, eight, but they can afford it And they've been waiting a long time. And I think if anything, they recognize now that rates are probably not going to move significantly lower. This year I think that's where the indications are. And it's time to move on with their lives. The kids have hit middle school, it's time to get a bigger house in a more prestigious town with better school district. And they're going to move forward. Now that's not everywhere. If it was, then it wouldn't be the market that I have described. So in those areas where buyers are a bit more hesitant, I think it's number one, those areas have had more significant price appreciation through the COVID years than other areas. So instead of a 40% to 50% price increase over the last five years, Maybe they're in a market where there's been 60%, 70%, 80%, 100% price increase and that includes Florida, primarily Austin, Texas as an example, where we've seen prices up dramatically. And I think that can cause some concern to people that boy, they just missed it, the price is up so much.

That goes to affordability. There's markets where inventory levels are growing a bit.

And so the resale market is not feeling as strong as it had in the past and there are some fears about the ability to sell my home.

And do they want a contract for a new move up home when they're not as confident in selling their existing home as quickly or at the price that they thought they they could sell it at. A lot of this growing inventory in existing markets is not with used homes coming on the market, it's with more new spec inventory hitting the market from the builders. And so those markets where you have more national builders, There may be more inventory that those national builders have put on the market. One of the reasons Boston down to Atlanta and particularly Boston down to The Carolinas, has been so strong for us is because the resale market does not have a lot of the new home specs sitting on it And so the resale market tends to be the older traditional resales and there aren't a lot of those on the market and it's tight and the opportunity is to go new. And so that's one of the reasons the North East, Mid Atlantic is so strong. So it's a really mixed story Part of it is what you described where there is our people are ready to move, but in other areas there is a bit of a headwinds and we're just we're managing through all of it.

Trevor, the one thing I'd add to Doug's comments since you mentioned rates, is that 26% of our buyers pay all cash. So the rate equation is of less relevance. To them. And that is a really strong number for us.

And the LTV at 68% means people have the ability because of their financial strength to take a bit less mortgage at a higher rate still make the move. And since we're selling here, let's not forget mom and dad.

Right.

They are affluent and they are wanting to help their kids move up in life and support down payments or whatever else they can do through gifting to lower the mortgage amount.

The next question will come from Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets Toll.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions.

So at the risk of asking you to extrapolate where none of us really want to extrapolate a day, a week, a few weeks, Given your comments on kind of both the mix, but then then the more recent week, can you just help level set kind of what Toll quantify some level of trends quarter to date because tip [indiscernible] sequentially in terms of order pace. So How are you stacking up compared to that? What are you thinking in terms of 2Q kind of pace, how you're tracking?

Yes. As you know, Mike, we're hesitant to give sales guidance, but I'll tell you that We believe that we will hit, we can hit, the market is there to hit, With the margin we talked about [indiscernible] price. Are not margin proud. We want to drive returns but we're also We have a good mix and it's working really well and we're going to continue to execute upon this strategy to stay in the middle lane between price and pace And we think we will hit 3,000 contracts in Q2 which is 2.4 agreements per month.

And there you have it. Right, Marty?

Yes. I think that's an achievable number. Without much move in the pricing of the homes? Correct.

Okay.

So status quo 3,000 Got it. In terms of then the spec dynamics, Marty, I think you mentioned kind of modest upside to spec margins as a driver for 1Q.

Can you give us an update? And I know you've got kind of mix adjusted numbers like for like there's a lot of things that go into the spec spread when you consider which specific loss you're You're building on can you give us an update on kind of where that where those margin spreads are on the specs versus built to order right now? Mike, I'll take this one. Spec margin is still running as we talked in the past about 200 to two fifty basis points below average We're comfortable with that. We did a little better in the first quarter, which is why the margin was up and And when we look at our our spec that is now in our backlog that we'll be delivering at some point here One of the reasons we're comfortable with our with our guide going forward is because It's doing a bit better than that. On a related subject, which also includes spec, Let's talk about incentives a little bit. The average incentive in Q4 of twenty four was $68,000 The average incentive in Q1 of $25,000 was $62,000 so came in by 6,000 We ended Q1 twenty twenty five were started Q2 twenty twenty five.

With an incentive at 55,000 So it had come down another 7,000 from the average in Q1. And with the mixed market we have to described in some markets, were raising prices and cutting incentives But in other markets, we know we will be giving back some of that improvement to take it back to what might have been the average in Q1 And we have all of that built in.

Plus some additional cushion when we talk about the returns we expect over the balance of the year. So that's where things stand right now.

The next question will come from Michael Rehaut With JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning, everyone.

I just wanted to I just wanted to circle back to your comment of mixed results. And I think there was a question about if those mix results were to continue, how would that affect the rest of the year? And the answer that you gave was interesting in that it didn't it appeared that your reiteration of full year guidance is in some ways, I guess, kind of incorporating the current state of mixed results. In other words, kind of reflecting where we are today. So I wanted to know if that kind of my take on that is kind of accurate. And in other words, [indiscernible] maybe the present state where you just described, you're maybe raising prices in some communities, raising incentives in others. If that current state again and some of the mix of pricing actions here, anticipating in response to that mixed results type of if that's all kind of incorporated in your current [indiscernible] Yes. We are anticipate with the guidance we have given, for the second quarter and the full year, We have assumed a continuation of this mixed market.

Right.

Okay. That's helpful. And I'd be important just to obviously state explicitly.

Mike, I think it's also important Toll to remember our backlog is two thirds of what we have left to go. Right? So we're really talking about The other 3,300 homes that we haven't sold and settled yet that have the say, variability and potential to impact positively or negatively our margin guidance.

Right. No, that's that's fair as well. And I guess, you'd was very helpful, Doug, in terms of walking through the dollar percent the dollars of incentives 4Q, 1Q and where you stand today, which is pretty impressive, all the I guess just to level set that, what was the average incentive in fiscal twenty twenty four And I guess with any kind of forward looking view on land cost inflation How are you thinking about land cost inflation this year and perhaps next year?

Q1 of twenty twenty four Greg Ziglar tells me our incentive was $55,000 And I'm sorry, Mike, I was focused on that number trying to get it for you. What was the other part? Land cost inflation what do we think? Thank you. Apologies. Very happy with deal flow.

We continue to find good action with our strict underwriting of a combination score of gross margin and IRR It's modest. I would say low Toll mid single digit If I had, that's where I think it is. Mike, it's I'm very I'm very pleased. We've had very unique opportunities lately in the land game.

A lot of suburban office that is half occupied and is better suited to be torn down and rebuilt as residential with towns embracing that.

Because they don't want to look at a blighted half empty office building anymore with the weeds growing. And they'd rather have some vibrancy and some people. And we're seeing a lot of cool deal flow around that, which is more infill. And the entitlements are a bit easier and more predictable. And the margins have been great. So just one example but there's a lot of that going on and we're really well suited for those kind of unique deals. With the way we go about it and as attractive as Toll Brothers is to many municipalities. So I'm very pleased in the land side and and the inflation is low.

And Mike, since we've focused a lot about our projections for this Toll, that low inflation cost is not relevant to our projections for this year, The land we have in the projections for this year is already known.

It's not going to be impacted by any inflationary pressures.

And next year for the most part, hard to turn raw land into houses in less than eighteen months.

Next question will come from Jesse Letterman with Zelman and Associates. Please go ahead. Actually, it's Ivy. Good morning. So So I think what Michael Rehart and others might be trying to get to just to circle back to guidance.

Is that going into the year, at the end of your fourth quarter and giving guidance for 1Q, you didn't know the market was going to be mixed. And now the market is mixed, but yet your outlook for earnings did not change. And I guess the question [indiscernible] the original guidance. I think that's the disconnect. But I think Marty maybe you explained it because year is only going to have one quarter that could be at risk. So is that the framework that we should be thinking about just to circle back there? And then I have a follow-up.

Sure. Great to hear your voice, Ivy. If you you guys remember back in the fall, we were hinting towards a 02/1950 gross margin in 25% and then when we gave More definitive guidance in December We cut that back modestly by twenty five point to the 02/2025 So there was a little bit of conservatism in December when we were thinking about where the market was, we felt better in December but we had a bad we had a bad September and October as rates had jumped up and as we were heading into the election. So I wouldn't say we were euphoric in December, we were still cautious. And we were hopeful, And now that we sit here in mid February, the results have been a bit more mix than we thought, but we were still doing okay. And we're outperforming frankly. Our spec pricing has been a bit better. There's more luxury coming in the second half of the year as we've talked about. There's more North And Pacific coming So We're just feeling good about where we are.

I can tell you and part of that might have been a little bit of a little bit of conservatism that we built into what we said in the which I'm glad we did.

Got it. No, that's helpful. And I think going back to the last question on land, I just don't know if you can quantify for us how much land still remains, that would have been purchased pre COVID. And if in fact there is a decent amount still that you will be able to go vertical on? At low cost on a low cost basis.

I think we like the term contracted for rather than purchased. Ivy just to be more recently, but based on a price that we set Pre COVID, We used December of twenty twenty as our as our pre and post COVID And we think it's approximately 30% of our land bank right now is still priced pre COVID. 50% of what we owned and 40% of what we settled.

Your next question will come from Rafi Jadroschit with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning.

It's Rafe.

Thanks for taking my question.

Are you, Rave? Just kind of following up on the comment about the kind of current absorption piece and the the demand trends have been a little bit more mixed. If we see sort of the absorption pace kind of stay like this over the intermediate term or over the next few quarters. Do you still think that, you'll be able to hold this 27% gross margin range or if the absorption sort of stays at this level, you mentioned that you're not margin proud, kind of push lean a little bit more into incentives?

Well, we're not going to guide beyond 25. We're very confident in what we've given all of you for the second quarter and the balance of the year. You say at this market sticks, I think if this market sticks since we already said we've were assuming it sticks with the guide we've given, and we are confident in this range of margin. However, if to take it Toll the next level, if the market it's better, you're going to see better margins out of us, [indiscernible] we love raising prices Nothing no better way to create urgency than price increase coming next Monday. And if the market was to soften, We're not going to stand proud and not sell homes and try to hang on to a margin that's not attainable. We're going to manage our business, which means there will be an intelligent, thoughtful local, decision being made between PACE and price. And that's how we go about it.

We are encouraged. I talked about how the incentive had come down as we started Q2 and how we're able to keep that incentive down in submarkets, but we might have to give some of it back in others We've already begun doing a little bit of that and we are encouraged of demand, meaning as we throw a few more bucks at it, buyers are responding. And that is certainly a good sign. There's nothing worse than the inelasticity or it doesn't matter what you do, the buyers are on the sidelines. So we are encouraged by what we're seeing in those markets that have required a little bit more of an incentive.

That's helpful. And then just on the SG and A, you called out that it was higher in the first quarter, some of it just has to do with lower deliveries. But also higher selling expenses. And then you still have deleveraged in the second quarter as Toll, but then leverage in the leverage in the second half of the year. Can you just talk about what's driving it higher in the first half, because sort of where does the leverage come second half and how we think about just SG and A dollar inflation going forward?

Sure. The biggest driver we had a little bit of a creep in sales and marketing expenses, but the biggest driver is just the leverage off of revenue. In the second half of twenty twenty five, we expect $6,600,000,000 of revenue in the second half of twenty twenty four we had $6,000,000,000 of revenue, so we have $6,000,000 more revenue in the second half of twenty twenty five than 'twenty four and the SG and A was 8.6% in the second half of 'twenty four And so we believe it's going to be in the low-8s for the second half of twenty five based off of leverage with that additional revenue I just described, And that is what brings home the full year guide.

The next question will come from Sam Reed with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Sam, we can't hear you.

Mr. And Mrs. Reed, your line is muted. Our next question will come from Alex Barron with Housing Research Center. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, Alex.

I wanted to ask about your specs. Are they mainly concentrated in your lower price points or are they across all price points They're across all price points. But they lean a little bit towards the affordable luxury size [indiscernible] I think we're more comfortable at specking $800,000 houses than we are $2,000,000 or $3,000,000 But we have it's across the board, but it leans a little bit Toll the more affordable one.

Got it. And in terms of you guys stepping on the brakes guess, on new permitting or new specs, I think that makes a lot of sense. Is it your sense that Other builders are starting to do that as Toll. And can you quantify are you guys just talking about delaying the what you've already sort of specked and started or you're how can we get our arms around What stepping on the brakes would mean for you?

Yes. We may be pumping the brakes a little bit. I don't think we're stepping on the brakes, but we are it's a fair comment. And Alex, I don't think we have enough intelligence in the field yet to be able to give you a definitive answer on whether the other builders are similarly pumping the brakes I am encouraged by some builders comments on earnings calls or elsewhere, that they too are being a bit more cautious in their spec starts.

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks. Please go ahead. Chuck, thank you very much.

Thanks everyone for your interest and support. As you all know, we are always here to answer any questions you may have individually. And stay warm. I think we're 24 degrees in Philadelphia today.

Or I hope you're somewhere where it is warm.

The conference has now concluded. [indiscernible]