Cathedral Ballot Company Owners
Curated by
roarsaraso13725
3 min read
45
1
The political affiliations and campaign contributions of election service company owners have sparked controversy, raising questions about the impartiality of critical election infrastructure and the need for stricter vendor neutrality standards to maintain public trust in the democratic process.
Cathedral Corporation Overview
Founded in 1916, Cathedral Corporation is a trusted provider of financial, marketing, and fundraising communications services based in Rome, New York
1
2
. The company, which generates annual revenue of $44.9 million and employs approximately 135 people, has expanded its operations through strategic acquisitions3
. Cathedral Corporation's subsidiary, Fidlar Election, plays a significant role in the election services industry, providing ballot printing for 42 of Florida's 67 counties and several other states, with a total production of over 414 million ballots2
. The company operates multiple facilities across the United States, including locations in Lincoln, RI, Orlando, FL, Deer Park, NY, Inglewood, CA, and a sales office in North Haven, CT.3 sources
Leadership and Political Donations
Marianne W. Gaige, Chairman of the Board and CEO of Cathedral Corporation, has demonstrated a consistent pattern of political donations favoring the Democratic party. Her contributions include monthly donations to ActBlue for over two decades, support for Obama and Biden campaigns, and contributions to various Democratic candidates and causes
1
. This partisan donation history extends to other major ballot printing companies as well. For instance, the Runbeck family, owners of Runbeck Election Services, have also been active donors to Democratic candidates and causes, with Robyn Runbeck specifically contributing to the "STOP REPUBLICANS" PAC1
. These donation patterns from leaders of companies handling critical election operations in multiple states, including swing states, have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the need for stronger vendor neutrality standards in the election services industry.1 source
Ethical Considerations in Elections
The concentration of election services in companies with leadership demonstrating strong partisan leanings raises significant ethical concerns. While these companies must meet technical and security requirements, there are limited regulations specifically governing the political activities of election service vendors
1
. This gap in oversight highlights the need for stronger vendor neutrality standards to maintain the integrity of electoral processes2
. The situation is particularly concerning given that companies like Cathedral Corporation and Runbeck Election Services handle critical election infrastructure in multiple swing states, potentially impacting public confidence in the fairness and impartiality of elections3
.3 sources
Public Trust Implications
The overt partisan affiliations of election service company owners pose a significant challenge to public trust in the democratic process. This issue highlights a critical gap in election infrastructure oversight, as current federal laws primarily focus on campaign contributions and ethics for elected officials, rather than regulating the political activities of election service vendors
1
. The lack of explicit restrictions on vendor neutrality can undermine confidence in electoral processes, especially when these companies handle critical infrastructure in multiple swing states2
. To address these concerns, there is a growing need for stronger governance standards in the election services industry, similar to those expected of other critical infrastructure providers. Implementing stricter vendor neutrality policies could help maintain the integrity and public trust essential for a robust democratic system3
.3 sources
Related
How does Cathedral Corporation maintain public trust in its business practices
What are the implications of corporate contributions on public trust
How do election printing companies influence public perception
What role does leadership play in maintaining public trust in corporations
How do financial communications impact public trust in organizations
Keep Reading
Legacy Media Misinformation Sources
The credibility of legacy media outlets has come under increasing scrutiny, with many Americans expressing distrust in major news organizations. A recent survey revealed that only 34% of Americans have confidence in the media to report news "fully, accurately and fairly." This skepticism spans across political lines, with significant partisan divides in media trust. CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, and CBC are among the prominent outlets facing credibility challenges, prompting calls...
2,108
US Election Betting Legalized
A federal judge has overturned a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) order, clearing the way for Kalshi Inc. to offer derivatives contracts allowing Americans to bet on the outcome of Congressional elections, as reported by Bloomberg. This ruling marks a significant shift in U.S. policy, potentially opening the door for regulated election betting markets in the country for the first time in a century.
12,230
FBI Raids Polymarket CEO
According to reports from Axios, the FBI raided the New York City apartment of Shayne Coplan, the founder and CEO of prediction market platform Polymarket, seizing his phone and other electronic devices amid scrutiny over the site's election betting activities.
29,326