Nathan Howard
·
gettyimages.comOregon's UBI Ballot Measure
Curated by
elymc
3 min read
3,562
70
Oregon voters will decide in November 2024 on a groundbreaking Universal Basic Income ballot measure that would raise corporate taxes to fund annual rebates of approximately $1,600 for every state resident. As reported by Business Insider, the proposed "Oregon Rebate" aims to combat poverty but faces opposition from business groups and some state officials concerned about potential economic impacts.
Measure 118 Proposal Details
Measure 118 proposes significant changes to Oregon's corporate tax structure to fund a universal basic income program:
- Increases the minimum corporate tax rate by 3% on sales exceeding $25 million1
- Removes the existing $100,000 cap on minimum corporate taxes1
- Revenue would be distributed equally among all Oregon residents residing in the state for more than 200 days annually1
- Distributions would not affect eligibility for state benefits1
- Requires replacement of any reduced federal benefits if the distribution negatively impacts an individual's need-based program benefits1
2
. Proponents argue it would help families afford basic necessities and stimulate local economies, while critics warn of potential negative impacts on Oregon's business climate and overall economy2
1
.2 sources
Estimated Financial Impact
The Oregon Rebate initiative is projected to generate significant revenue and distribute substantial rebates to residents:
- Estimated to raise at least $6 billion annually from increased corporate taxes1
- Would provide approximately $1,600 per year to each of Oregon's 4.2 million residents once fully implemented in 20271
- A family of four could receive around $6,400 annually, tax-free21
1
Proponents claim the rebates could stimulate local economies, while opponents warn of potential price increases and business relocations that could offset benefits.3
4
4 sources
Potential Poverty Reduction
The Oregon Rebate initiative aims to significantly reduce poverty rates in the state through its proposed Universal Basic Income program. According to estimates from the UBI Center's Basic Income Builder, the measure could lead to a substantial decrease in overall poverty and child poverty rates:
These projections represent a notable improvement from earlier estimates, which had suggested a 15% reduction in overall poverty and a 26% reduction in child poverty
2
3
. The increased impact is likely due to the higher rebate amount of $1,600 per person annually, compared to the initially proposed $7501
.
Proponents argue that the lump-sum payments could be particularly effective in breaking cycles of poverty. Antonio Gisbert, the chief petitioner of the initiative, emphasizes that for a family of four, receiving $6,400 at once could make a significant difference in their financial situation1
. This substantial sum could potentially help families address immediate needs, pay off debts, or invest in opportunities for economic advancement.
However, critics argue that the potential economic disruption caused by the increased corporate taxes might offset some of these poverty reduction benefits. They contend that possible price increases and job losses could disproportionately affect low-income individuals, potentially mitigating the positive impact of the rebates4
5
.
Despite these concerns, supporters maintain that the measure would represent a significant step towards addressing wealth inequality in Oregon. They argue that by redistributing revenue from large corporations to all residents, the initiative could help create a more equitable economic landscape in the state1
.5 sources
Opposition and Concerns
Critics of Measure 118 raise several concerns about its potential impact on Oregon's economy. Governor Tina Kotek, along with major corporations like Intel and Nike, oppose the measure, arguing it could drive businesses out of the state due to increased costs
1
. The tax on sales rather than profits is seen as particularly problematic, potentially disproportionately affecting low-margin businesses2
. Some opponents also argue that $1,600 per year is insufficient to be considered a true "basic income" and worry about potential price increases for consumers that could offset the benefits of the rebate2
3
.3 sources
Related
What are the main concerns about the funding mechanism for the Oregon Rebate
How might the Oregon Rebate impact corporate investment in the state
What are the potential economic impacts on Oregon's local communities
How will the Oregon Rebate be administered and managed
What are the arguments in favor of the Oregon Rebate
