Petra Molnar is a prominent lawyer and researcher specializing in migration, technology, and human rights, with a focus on protecting the rights of people crossing borders. As the Associate Director of York University's Refugee Law Lab and co-runner of the Migration and Technology Monitor, Molnar investigates the human rights impacts of AI and automated technologies on migration control12. Her work critically examines the use of border technologies such as AI lie detectors, algorithms for refugee detention placement, and surveillance drones, advocating for ethical implementation and accountability in these high-risk technological experiments2. Molnar's expertise has been widely recognized, leading to her appointment as a Faculty Associate at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society and her forthcoming book "The Walls Have Eyes: Surviving Migration in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," which explores the intersection of technology and human rights at borders34.

AI and surveillance technologies are increasingly being deployed at borders, raising significant human rights concerns for migrants and refugees. While these technologies can potentially enhance border security and efficiency, they also pose risks of privacy violations, discrimination, and infringement on fundamental rights like seeking asylum12. Facial recognition and algorithmic profiling systems used for border management are prone to errors and biases, particularly when applied to diverse populations3. This can lead to misidentification, unfair treatment, and serious consequences for affected individuals. The extensive collection and processing of personal data through these technologies also contributes to what some describe as "surveillance capitalism," where privacy is traded for digital conveniences3. To address these issues, experts recommend implementing robust safeguards, enhancing transparency in AI systems, improving data quality, and establishing strong regulatory frameworks to protect vulnerable populations and uphold human rights in border management practices43.

Digital technologies have transformed the migration experience, offering both opportunities and challenges for refugees and other forcibly displaced people. While smartphones and social media can empower migrants by providing access to vital information, support networks, and resources during their journeys, they also present significant risks1. Limited internet access, low digital literacy, and socioeconomic barriers often exclude vulnerable populations from fully benefiting from these technologies1. Additionally, the digitization of migration management systems raises concerns about privacy, data protection, and potential misuse of personal information2. For instance, the use of AI-powered lie detectors and automated decision-making in immigration processes can lead to biased outcomes, particularly affecting individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds or those suffering from trauma2. As governments and organizations increasingly rely on digital solutions, it is crucial to address these challenges to ensure that technology serves to protect rather than compromise the rights and well-being of migrants and refugees312.

Human rights advocacy employs a variety of strategies to promote and protect fundamental rights. Effective advocacy involves careful planning, clear messaging, and strategic engagement with authorities and stakeholders. Key approaches include conducting credible research to document abuses, building diverse coalitions, and applying pressure through multiple channels1. Advocates often use techniques such as direct or indirect communication, showing empathy, and stressing mutual objectives when interacting with decision-makers2. Successful strategies may incorporate letter-writing campaigns, petitions, social media outreach, and the strategic use of research reports to raise awareness and influence policy3. Human rights organizations emphasize the importance of person-centered advocacy, ensuring that the dignity and autonomy of affected individuals remain at the forefront of all efforts4. Flexibility, transparency, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances are also crucial principles for effective human rights advocacy3.

The Legally Speaking Podcast, hosted by Rob Hanna, aims to inspire, educate, and entertain listeners about the world of law. Available on major platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify, the show releases new episodes every Monday featuring interviews with notable guests from the legal industry12. The podcast covers a wide range of topics including mental health in law firms, alternative business structures, legal technology, and career development for aspiring lawyers1. With a 4.9-star rating on Apple Podcasts, listeners praise the show for its engaging interviews and informative content that helps build legal industry knowledge and commercial awareness2. The podcast is sponsored by Clio, a leading provider of legal practice management software1.

The Legally Speaking Podcast and information derived from AI tools like Perplexity should be approached with caution regarding legal matters. While these resources aim to provide accurate information, AI-generated content can contain errors or outdated information. Perplexity AI, for instance, has shown inconsistencies in accuracy across different topics, with strengths in certain areas but limitations in others12. The podcast content reflects opinions of guests and hosts, which may not always align with current legal standards. Users are strongly advised to verify critical information with authoritative sources and consult qualified legal professionals for specific legal matters. Neither the podcast creators nor AI tools assume liability for actions taken based on the information provided. By using these resources, users acknowledge the potential risks of inaccuracies in AI-generated content and podcast discussions34.