On March 28, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," which targets the Smithsonian Institution12. The order appoints Vice President JD Vance to the Smithsonian Board of Regents with the task of eliminating "divisive race-centered ideology" from the institution's museums, research centers, and the National Zoo1. Key aspects of the order include:

• Prohibiting expenditure on exhibits or programs deemed to "degrade shared American values" or "divide Americans based on race"

• Directing a review of content related to race and gender identity in Smithsonian museums

• Ensuring that the American Women's History Museum celebrates women's achievements without recognizing "men as women"31

The order claims that the Smithsonian has promoted narratives portraying American and Western values as "inherently harmful and oppressive," and aims to restore the institution as a "symbol of inspiration and American greatness"34. This move has sparked debate about the role of cultural institutions in presenting diverse historical narratives and the potential impact on the Smithsonian's independence and funding2.

Lonnie Bunch, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, has strongly defended the organization's independence and commitment to scholarship in the face of political pressure. In a message to Smithsonian staff, Bunch emphasized that the institution would "remain steadfast in our mission to bring history, science, education, research, and the arts to all Americans" and continue to "showcase world-class exhibits, collections, and objects, rooted in expertise and accuracy."1 He affirmed that the Smithsonian would maintain its internal review processes and adapt when necessary, while remaining dedicated to telling the "multi-faceted stories of this country's extraordinary heritage."1

• Bunch pledged to work with the Board of Regents, including Vice President Vance, as the Smithsonian has done throughout its history

• He highlighted the importance of scholarship, expertise, and service to the American public

• The statement reaffirms the Smithsonian's role as an independent cultural institution amid concerns over potential government interference and censorship12

The executive order has raised significant concerns among museum professionals and cultural organizations about potential government overreach and censorship. Critics argue that such measures could undermine the Smithsonian's role as a trusted repository of American history and culture, potentially threatening its ability to present diverse and nuanced historical narratives12. The order's impact extends beyond the Smithsonian, as it represents a broader attempt to influence the portrayal of American history in public institutions. This has sparked a debate about the balance between political influence and the independence of cultural and educational organizations in preserving and interpreting national heritage.

The Smithsonian Institution remains committed to its mission of inclusivity and comprehensive historical representation, despite recent political pressures. This commitment is exemplified by initiatives such as "Our Shared Future: Reckoning with Our Racial Past," which aims to foster understanding and equity through museum programming1. The institution's dedication to presenting diverse narratives is further underscored by the creation of new museums by Congress, including the American Women's History Museum, which seeks to celebrate women's achievements across various fields1. These efforts reflect the Smithsonian's ongoing role in addressing complex historical topics and promoting dialogue about America's multifaceted cultural heritage.