a10networks.com
a10networks.com
TLS 1.3 and mTLS
Curated by
moritzmaie46877
5 min read
·
Advanced
11,391
22
Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 and mutual TLS (mTLS) represent significant advancements in secure communication protocols. TLS 1.3, standardized in 2018, offers improved performance and security over its predecessor, while mTLS extends the traditional TLS model by requiring both client and server to authenticate using X.509 certificates, enhancing trust in distributed systems and cloud environments.

TLS 1.2 vs 1.3

a10networks.com
a10networks.com
TLS 1.3 introduces several key improvements over TLS 1.2, enhancing both security and performance. The handshake process in TLS 1.3 is significantly faster, requiring only one round trip (1-RTT) compared to TLS 1.2's two round trips
1
2
.
This is achieved through a more efficient key exchange mechanism and the removal of unnecessary messages. TLS 1.3 also mandates forward secrecy by default, eliminating support for static RSA and Diffie-Hellman key exchange methods
3
.
The cipher suite selection has been simplified and strengthened, removing support for vulnerable algorithms like RC4, DES, 3DES, AES-CBC, SHA-1, and MD5
1
4
.
Additionally, TLS 1.3 introduces the concept of 0-RTT (Zero Round Trip Time) resumption, allowing clients to send data immediately in certain scenarios, further reducing latency
1
5
.
These changes collectively result in improved security, reduced attack surface, and enhanced performance in TLS 1.3 compared to its predecessor.
a10networks.com favicon
ssldragon.com favicon
faddom.com favicon
5 sources

0-RTT Security Risks

haproxy.com
haproxy.com
The 0-RTT (Zero Round Trip Time) mode in TLS 1.3 introduces significant performance benefits but also comes with notable security risks. The primary concern is the vulnerability to replay attacks, where an attacker can intercept and retransmit 0-RTT data
1
2
.
This risk arises because 0-RTT data lacks forward secrecy and can be replayed across different server instances or zones
3
.
Potential consequences include duplication of non-idempotent actions, such as financial transactions, and the ability for attackers to reorder 0-RTT messages relative to other traffic
2
.
Additionally, 0-RTT data may be susceptible to cache timing attacks, potentially leaking information about the content of early data
2
.
To mitigate these risks, implementations must carefully manage session resumption, reject obviously non-idempotent requests (e.g., POST or PUT), and consider using techniques like the Early-Data HTTP header to allow origins to selectively accept or reject 0-RTT data
4
.
yifan-online.com favicon
news.ycombinator.com favicon
ijmlc.org favicon
5 sources

Zero Round-Trip Time (0-RTT) Key Exchanges

blog.cloudflare.com
blog.cloudflare.com
Zero Round-Trip Time (0-RTT) key exchange is an innovative protocol feature introduced in TLS 1.3 to reduce latency in establishing secure connections. Originally proposed by Google in 2013, 0-RTT allows clients to send encrypted data along with the initial handshake message, eliminating the need for an additional round trip to complete the key exchange
1
2
.
This is achieved by utilizing previously shared secrets or session tickets from prior connections. While 0-RTT significantly improves connection speed, it comes with security considerations, particularly the risk of replay attacks. To mitigate these risks, implementations must carefully manage session resumption and incorporate additional safeguards. Despite these challenges, 0-RTT has been widely adopted, including in protocols like QUIC, and is supported by major platforms such as HAProxy, demonstrating its value in modern, low-latency network communications
2
3
.
hss-opus.ub.ruhr favicon
haproxy.com favicon
ntnuopen.ntnu.no favicon
5 sources

Certificate Authorities and Their Role

thesslstore.com
thesslstore.com
Certificate Authorities (CAs) play a crucial role in establishing trust and security in digital communications through the issuance and management of digital certificates. CAs are responsible for verifying the identity of certificate applicants and binding their public keys to their identities through digitally signed certificates
1
2
.
These certificates enable secure, encrypted communication using public key cryptography, where the CA's digital signature serves as a trust anchor
3
.
CAs maintain Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) and often provide Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) services to ensure the ongoing validity of issued certificates
1
.
In Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), CAs can be organized hierarchically, with root CAs at the top and subordinate CAs below, each responsible for issuing certificates within their designated scope
4
.
This hierarchical structure allows for scalable trust models and delegation of certificate issuance authority. Enterprise CAs integrate with Active Directory for automated certificate management, while standalone CAs operate independently, offering flexibility for non-Microsoft environments
4
5
.
portnox.com favicon
fortanix.com favicon
ssl.com favicon
5 sources

TLS 1.3 Cipher Suites and Security Enhancements

a10networks.com
a10networks.com
TLS 1.3 introduces significant improvements in cipher suite design and security enhancements compared to its predecessors. The protocol reduces the number of supported cipher suites to just five, eliminating vulnerable algorithms and simplifying configuration
1
3
.
These cipher suites are: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256, TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256, TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256, and TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256
2
3
.
Unlike TLS 1.2, which specified cipher suites with key exchange and authentication methods, TLS 1.3 decouples these components, focusing solely on the bulk cipher and hashing algorithm
5
.
This change enhances security by removing support for outdated cryptographic primitives like RC4, 3DES, MD5, and SHA-1
1
.
Additionally, TLS 1.3 encrypts more of the handshake process, improving privacy and mitigating various attacks that plagued earlier versions, such as BEAST, POODLE, and Lucky13
1
4
.
owasp.org favicon
microfocus.com favicon
wiki.openssl.org favicon
5 sources

Implementing mTLS Handshake

tetrate.io
tetrate.io
Establishing mTLS communication involves a multi-step process that ensures mutual authentication between client and server. The handshake begins with the client initiating a connection, followed by both parties exchanging and verifying certificates
2
.
The server sends its certificate and public key, which the client verifies using the Certificate Authority's (CA) public key
3
.
Uniquely in mTLS, the client also sends its certificate for server verification
2
.
After certificate exchange, the client encrypts a random secret key with the server's public key, which the server then decrypts with its private key
3
.
This process establishes a secure, encrypted channel where both parties have authenticated each other's identities. To implement mTLS, organizations must generate and manage root certificates, client certificates, and server certificates, ensuring proper signing and distribution
4
.
The Common Name (CN) in client certificates and the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) in server certificates play crucial roles in identification and hostname verification
4
.
azion.com favicon
cloudflare.com favicon
builtin.com favicon
5 sources

Client Certificate Authentication

comodosslstore.com
comodosslstore.com
In mTLS configurations, servers can be configured to only allow connections from clients presenting specific certificates, enhancing security and access control. This is typically achieved through certificate pinning or by validating specific attributes of the client certificate. The server can be configured to check the client certificate's issuer, subject, or specific extensions like the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) or Extended Key Usage (EKU)
3
.
For instance, the server might require that client certificates contain the "Client Authentication" purpose in their EKU extension, with the object identifier (OID) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2
3
.
Additionally, the server can validate the certificate against a predefined list of trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs) or even specific certificate fingerprints. This approach ensures that only clients with certificates meeting precise criteria are granted access, effectively implementing a form of certificate-based authentication and authorization
4
5
.
support.apple.com favicon
learn.microsoft.com favicon
learn.microsoft.com favicon
5 sources

Mutual Authentication Protocol

f5.com
f5.com
The multi-step process for mutual authentication in mTLS involves a series of cryptographic exchanges to ensure both client and server verify each other's identity. The process begins with the client initiating a TLS handshake by sending a "ClientHello" message, including supported cipher suites and a random number
1
.
The server responds with a "ServerHello" message, its certificate, and a request for the client's certificate
3
.
The client verifies the server's certificate against trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs) and sends its own certificate to the server
1
.
The server then verifies the client's certificate. If both verifications succeed, the client sends a pre-master secret encrypted with the server's public key, which the server decrypts with its private key
4
.
Finally, both parties derive session keys from the pre-master secret, establishing a secure, encrypted channel for further communication
1
3
.
This process ensures that both parties are authenticated and that the subsequent data exchange is protected from eavesdropping and tampering.
securew2.com favicon
en.wikipedia.org favicon
builtin.com favicon
5 sources

Standard TLS Handshake

cloudflare.com
cloudflare.com
Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a cryptographic protocol designed to provide secure communication over computer networks
1
.
The protocol operates between the transport and application layers of the TCP/IP stack, enhancing the security of standard TCP/IP communications
2
.
TLS uses a combination of symmetric and asymmetric cryptography to establish a secure connection, typically involving a handshake process that consists of key exchange, server parameters, and authentication phases
2
.
The protocol has evolved through several versions, with TLS 1.3 being the latest major release as of August 2018
1
.
TLS 1.3 introduced significant improvements in security and performance, including a shortened handshake process and the elimination of vulnerable algorithms
5
.
The TLS Record Protocol encapsulates the data to be exchanged in a specific format, allowing for compression, padding, message authentication, and encryption depending on the connection state
1
.
en.wikipedia.org favicon
docs.oracle.com favicon
ietf.org favicon
5 sources
Related
How does TLS ensure data integrity
What are the main differences between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3
How does the TLS handshake process work
What role do certificates play in TLS
How is TLS integrated with HTTP