Please tell me what the website presents as good arguments why 9/11 was an inside job

The website presents several arguments suggesting that the 9/11 attacks were an "inside job" orchestrated by the US government or other powerful groups, rather than the official narrative of being carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists. Here are some of the key arguments made:
  1. It questions how the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center 7 before it actually fell, implying foreknowledge of the event.
  2. It disputes the official explanation for the Pentagon damage, suggesting a missile rather than a plane hit the building.
  3. It claims the wreckage at the Shanksville, Pennsylvania site where United 93 crashed was inconsistent with a plane crash.
  4. It promotes the idea that the Twin Towers' collapse could not have been caused solely by the plane impacts and fires, alleging explosives must have been used in a controlled demolition.
  5. It highlights statements from officials like the 9/11 Commission members expressing doubts about the official narrative and claiming a coverup occurred.
  6. It suggests a broader conspiracy involving the "deep state" working to curtail civil liberties and establish an authoritarian world government.
However, it's important to note that the claims made on this website contradict extensive investigations and evidence provided by the 9/11 Commission, government agencies, and expert groups which have refuted and debunked these conspiracy theories.
what is the corbett report's stance on 9/11
what evidence does the corbett report present to support their argument
how does the corbett report's argument differ from other 9/11 conspiracy theories