User avatar
bmorphism
81
what is autopoietic ergodicity

Copilot

4 steps completed

Answer

Autopoietic ergodicity is not a well-defined term in the literature. However, we can break down the two concepts it combines: autopoiesis and ergodicity. Autopoiesis refers to a system capable of producing and maintaining itself by creating its own parts
7
.
It was introduced in the context of living systems and is closely related to self-organization and homeostasis
8
.
Ergodicity, on the other hand, is a property of a system that states it cannot be reduced or factored into smaller components
9
.
In the context of dynamical systems, ergodicity means that the time average of any measurable function of the system converges over a sufficient amount of time
5
.
While these two concepts are not directly related, they both deal with the behavior of complex systems. Autopoiesis focuses on the self-organizing and self-maintaining aspects of living systems, while ergodicity is a property of dynamical systems that helps in understanding their long-term behavior. Combining these concepts might suggest an interest in exploring the long-term behavior of self-organizing and self-maintaining systems, but there is no established term or theory called "autopoietic ergodicity" in the literature.
autopoiesis in social systems and movements

Copilot

7 steps completed

Answer

Autopoiesis in social systems refers to the application of the concept of autopoiesis, originally developed in biology, to the study of social systems. The term "autopoiesis" (from Greek "auto-" meaning "self" and "poiesis" meaning "creation" or "production") denotes a system capable of reproducing and maintaining itself by creating its own parts and eventually further components
10
.
In the context of social systems, autopoiesis is associated with the work of German sociologist and philosopher Niklas Luhmann, who used the concept to describe society as composed of closed systems of self-referential communication that constantly reproduce and evolve themselves via the repetition of their own operations
2
.
Luhmann's autopoietic social systems theory distinguishes between society and functionally differentiated social systems. Society is seen as a first-order social system, whereas functionally differentiated social systems, such as the economy, politics, and education, are considered second-order social systems
8
.
These systems are self-organizing and self-maintaining, and their structures are determined by their own internal processes
11
.
When applied to social movements, autopoiesis can be used to analyze the self-organizing and self-maintaining aspects of these movements. Social movements can be seen as autopoietic systems that create and maintain their own structures, identities, and goals through internal communication and interaction processes. This perspective can help researchers understand how social movements evolve, adapt, and respond to changes in their environment, as well as how they maintain their coherence and identity over time. In summary, autopoiesis in social systems and movements refers to the application of the concept of self-organization and self-maintenance to the study of social phenomena. This perspective, primarily associated with the work of Niklas Luhmann, can provide valuable insights into the dynamics and evolution of social systems and movements.

Related

examples of social systems or movements that exhibit autopoiesis
how does autopoiesis theory explain the self-organization of social systems and movements
what are the criticisms of applying autopoiesis theory to social systems and movements